Development and validation of a prognostic model for recurrent glioblastoma patients treated with bevacizumab and irinotecan

被引:11
|
作者
Urup, Thomas [1 ,2 ]
Dahlrot, Rikke Hedegaard [3 ]
Grunnet, Kirsten [1 ,2 ]
Christensen, Ib Jarle [4 ]
Michaelsen, Signe Regner [1 ]
Toft, Anders [1 ]
Larsen, Vibeke Andree [5 ]
Broholm, Helle [6 ]
Kosteljanetz, Michael [7 ]
Hansen, Steinbjorn [3 ]
Poulsen, Hans Skovgaard [1 ,2 ]
Lassen, Ulrik [1 ,2 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Rigshosp, Dept Radiat Biol, Finsen Ctr, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] Rigshosp, Dept Oncol, Finsen Ctr, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] Odense Univ Hosp, Dept Oncol, DK-5000 Odense, Denmark
[4] Univ Copenhagen, Hvidovre Hosp, Lab Gastroenterol, Copenhagen, Denmark
[5] Rigshosp, Ctr Diagnost Invest, Dept Radiol, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
[6] Rigshosp, Ctr Diagnost Invest, Dept Neuropathol, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
[7] Rigshosp, Dept Neurosurg, Neuroctr, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
[8] Rigshosp, Finsenctr, Phase Unit 1, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
II CLINICAL-TRIALS; HIGH-GRADE GLIOMAS; MALIGNANT GLIOMA; PLUS IRINOTECAN; PHASE-II; SURVIVAL; MULTIFORME; CRITERIA;
D O I
10.3109/0284186X.2015.1114679
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Predictive markers and prognostic models are required in order to individualize treatment of recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) patients. Here, we sought to identify clinical factors able to predict response and survival in recurrent GBM patients treated with bevacizumab (BEV) and irinotecan. Material and methods A total of 219 recurrent GBM patients treated with BEV plus irinotecan according to a previously published treatment protocol were included in the initial population. Prognostic models were generated by means of multivariate logistic and Cox regression analysis. Results In multivariate analysis, corticosteroid use had a negative predictive impact on response at first evaluation (OR 0.45; 95% CI 0.22-0.93; p = 0.03) and at best response (OR 0.51; 95% CI 0.26-1.02; p = 0.056). Three significant (p < 0.05) prognostic factors associated with reduced progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) were identified. These factors were included in the final model for OS, namely corticosteroid use (HR 1.70; 95% CI 1.18-2.45; p = 0.004), neurocognitive deficit (HR 1.40; 95% CI 1.04-1.89; p = 0.03) and multifocal disease (HR 1.56; 95% CI 1.15-2.11; p < 0.0001). Based on these results a prognostic index able to calculate the probability for OS at 6 and 12 months for the individual patient was established. The predictive value of the model for OS was validated in a separate patient cohort of 85 patients. Discussion and conclusion A prognostic model for OS was established and validated. This model can be used by physicians to risk stratify the individual patient and together with the patient decide whether to initiate BEV relapse treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:418 / 422
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Irinotecan and bevacizumab in recurrent glioblastoma multiforme
    Jakobsen, Jan Nyrop
    Hasselbalch, Benedikte
    Stockhausen, Marie-Therese
    Lassen, Ulrik
    Poulsen, Hans Skovgaard
    [J]. EXPERT OPINION ON PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2011, 12 (05) : 825 - 833
  • [12] THREE PATIENTS WITH GLIOBLASTOMA MULTIFORME TREATED WITH BEVACIZUMAB AND IRINOTECAN
    Senin Loreto, Dominguez
    Argaiz Maria, Sanchez
    Diaz Inmaculada, Perez
    Tarazona Victoria, Avino
    [J]. ATENCION FARMACEUTICA, 2012, 14 (03): : 205 - 209
  • [13] Bevacizumab and irinotecan in patients (pts) with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM)
    Raval, S.
    Hwang, S.
    Dorsett, L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (18)
  • [14] Reoperation does not provide a survival advantage in patients with recurrent Glioblastoma treated with irinotecan/bevacizumab treatment
    Sever, Ozlem Nuray
    Oktay, Kadir
    Guzel, Ebru
    Kaya, Vildan
    Guzel, Aslan
    Yildirim, Mustafa
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2021, 58 (01) : 91 - 95
  • [15] Bevacizumab plus irinotecan in recurrent glioblastoma - Reply
    Vredenburgh, James J.
    Desjardins, Annick
    Reardon, David A.
    Friedman, Henry S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 26 (06) : 1013 - 1013
  • [16] Bevacizumab plus irinotecan in recurrent glioblastoma multiforme
    Vredenburgh, James J.
    Desjardins, Annick
    Herndon, James E., II
    Marcello, Jennifer
    Reardon, David A.
    Quinn, Jennifer A.
    Rich, Jeremy N.
    Sathornsumetee, Sith
    Gururangan, Sridharan
    Sampson, John
    Wagner, Melissa
    Bailey, Leighann
    Bigner, Darell D.
    Friedman, Allan H.
    Friedman, Henry S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (30) : 4722 - 4729
  • [17] Flashback Foreword: Bevacizumab and Irinotecan in Recurrent Glioblastoma
    Mellinghoff, Ingo K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 41 (32) : 4943 - +
  • [18] Bevacizumab Alone and in Combination With Irinotecan in Recurrent Glioblastoma
    Friedman, Henry S.
    Prados, Michael D.
    Wen, Patrick Y.
    Mikkelsen, Tom
    Schiff, David
    Abrey, Lauren E.
    Yung, W. K. Alfred
    Paleologos, Nina
    Nicholas, Martin K.
    Jensen, Randy
    Vredenburgh, James
    Huang, Jane
    Zheng, Maoxia
    Cloughesy, Timothy
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 27 (28) : 4733 - 4740
  • [19] Peritumoral Apparent Diffusion Coefficient as a Metric of Response in Patients with Recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme Treated with Bevacizumab and Irinotecan
    Andre, J. B.
    Lu, S.
    Spearman, K.
    Raval, S. N.
    [J]. NEURORADIOLOGY JOURNAL, 2008, 21 (03): : 350 - 361
  • [20] MCQs on "Reoperation does not provide a survival advantage in patients with recurrent Glioblastoma treated with irinotecan/bevacizumab treatment"
    Darling, H. S.
    Jaiswal, Pradeep
    Lohia, Nishant
    Tiwari, Nishant R.
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2021, 58 (01) : 96 - 97