Development and validation of a prognostic model for recurrent glioblastoma patients treated with bevacizumab and irinotecan

被引:11
|
作者
Urup, Thomas [1 ,2 ]
Dahlrot, Rikke Hedegaard [3 ]
Grunnet, Kirsten [1 ,2 ]
Christensen, Ib Jarle [4 ]
Michaelsen, Signe Regner [1 ]
Toft, Anders [1 ]
Larsen, Vibeke Andree [5 ]
Broholm, Helle [6 ]
Kosteljanetz, Michael [7 ]
Hansen, Steinbjorn [3 ]
Poulsen, Hans Skovgaard [1 ,2 ]
Lassen, Ulrik [1 ,2 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Rigshosp, Dept Radiat Biol, Finsen Ctr, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] Rigshosp, Dept Oncol, Finsen Ctr, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] Odense Univ Hosp, Dept Oncol, DK-5000 Odense, Denmark
[4] Univ Copenhagen, Hvidovre Hosp, Lab Gastroenterol, Copenhagen, Denmark
[5] Rigshosp, Ctr Diagnost Invest, Dept Radiol, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
[6] Rigshosp, Ctr Diagnost Invest, Dept Neuropathol, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
[7] Rigshosp, Dept Neurosurg, Neuroctr, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
[8] Rigshosp, Finsenctr, Phase Unit 1, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
II CLINICAL-TRIALS; HIGH-GRADE GLIOMAS; MALIGNANT GLIOMA; PLUS IRINOTECAN; PHASE-II; SURVIVAL; MULTIFORME; CRITERIA;
D O I
10.3109/0284186X.2015.1114679
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Predictive markers and prognostic models are required in order to individualize treatment of recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) patients. Here, we sought to identify clinical factors able to predict response and survival in recurrent GBM patients treated with bevacizumab (BEV) and irinotecan. Material and methods A total of 219 recurrent GBM patients treated with BEV plus irinotecan according to a previously published treatment protocol were included in the initial population. Prognostic models were generated by means of multivariate logistic and Cox regression analysis. Results In multivariate analysis, corticosteroid use had a negative predictive impact on response at first evaluation (OR 0.45; 95% CI 0.22-0.93; p = 0.03) and at best response (OR 0.51; 95% CI 0.26-1.02; p = 0.056). Three significant (p < 0.05) prognostic factors associated with reduced progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) were identified. These factors were included in the final model for OS, namely corticosteroid use (HR 1.70; 95% CI 1.18-2.45; p = 0.004), neurocognitive deficit (HR 1.40; 95% CI 1.04-1.89; p = 0.03) and multifocal disease (HR 1.56; 95% CI 1.15-2.11; p < 0.0001). Based on these results a prognostic index able to calculate the probability for OS at 6 and 12 months for the individual patient was established. The predictive value of the model for OS was validated in a separate patient cohort of 85 patients. Discussion and conclusion A prognostic model for OS was established and validated. This model can be used by physicians to risk stratify the individual patient and together with the patient decide whether to initiate BEV relapse treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:418 / 422
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prognostic factors in recurrent glioblastoma patients treated with bevacizumab
    Schaub, Christina
    Tichy, Julia
    Schaefer, Niklas
    Franz, Kea
    Mack, Frederic
    Mittelbronn, Michel
    Kebir, Sied
    Thiepold, Anna-Luisa
    Waha, Andreas
    Filmann, Natalie
    Banat, Mohammed
    Fimmers, Rolf
    Steinbach, Joachim P.
    Herrlinger, Ulrich
    Rieger, Johannes
    Glas, Martin
    Baehr, Oliver
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2016, 129 (01) : 93 - 100
  • [2] Prognostic factors in recurrent glioblastoma patients treated with bevacizumab
    Christina Schaub
    Julia Tichy
    Niklas Schäfer
    Kea Franz
    Frederic Mack
    Michel Mittelbronn
    Sied Kebir
    Anna-Luisa Thiepold
    Andreas Waha
    Natalie Filmann
    Mohammed Banat
    Rolf Fimmers
    Joachim P. Steinbach
    Ulrich Herrlinger
    Johannes Rieger
    Martin Glas
    Oliver Bähr
    [J]. Journal of Neuro-Oncology, 2016, 129 : 93 - 100
  • [3] BEVACIZUMAB AND IRINOTECAN IN THE TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA
    Naskhletashvili, D. R.
    Gorbounova, V.
    Bychkov, M.
    Bekyashev, A.
    Karakhan, V.
    Aloshin, V.
    Fu, R.
    Moskvina, E.
    [J]. NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2012, 14 : 59 - 59
  • [4] Radiographic evaluation of recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) in patients treated with bevacizumab and irinotecan
    Andre, J.
    Spearman, K.
    Lu, S.
    Hwang, S.
    Dorsett, L.
    Raval, S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (18)
  • [5] Radiographic evaluation of recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (gbm) in patients treated with bevacizumab and irinotecan
    Andre, Jalal
    Spearman, Kenneth
    Lu, Stanley
    Raval, Sumul
    [J]. NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2007, 9 (04) : 575 - 575
  • [6] Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio is prognostic in recurrent glioblastoma multiforme treated with bevacizumab plus irinotecan
    Haksoyler, Veysel
    A Besen, Ali
    Koseci, Tolga
    Olgun, Polat
    Bayram, Ertugrul
    Topkan, Erkan
    [J]. BIOMARKERS IN MEDICINE, 2021, 15 (11) : 851 - 859
  • [7] Bevacizumab in combination with irinotecan for patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme
    Schiff, David
    Purow, Benjamin
    [J]. NATURE CLINICAL PRACTICE ONCOLOGY, 2008, 5 (04): : 186 - 187
  • [8] Bevacizumab in combination with irinotecan for patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme
    David Schiff
    Benjamin Purow
    [J]. Nature Clinical Practice Oncology, 2008, 5 : 186 - 187
  • [9] Bevacizumab and irinotecan in patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM)
    Raval, Sumul N.
    Rule, Amy
    Hwang, Shirley S.
    [J]. NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2006, 8 (04) : 482 - 482
  • [10] Bevacizumab plus irinotecan in recurrent glioblastoma
    Chamberlain, Marc C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 26 (06) : 1012 - 1013