On backstops and boomerangs: Environmental R&D under technological uncertainty

被引:13
|
作者
Goeschl, Timo [1 ]
Perino, Grischa [2 ]
机构
[1] Heidelberg Univ, Alfred Weber Inst, Dept Econ, D-69115 Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Univ E Anglia, Sch Econ, Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk, England
关键词
Climate change; Technological change; Uncertainty; Backstop technology; Multi-stage optimal control; INNOVATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2009.02.006
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In areas such as climate change, the recent economic literature has been emphasizing and addressing the pervasive presence of uncertainty. This paper considers a new and salient form of uncertainty, namely uncertainty regarding the environmental characteristics of 'green' innovations. Here, R&D may generate both backstop technologies and technologies that turn out to involve a new pollution problem ('boomerangs'). In the optimum, R&D will therefore typically be undertaken more than once. Extending results from multi-stage optimal control theory, we present a tractable model with a full characterization of the optimal pollution and R&D policies and the role of uncertainty. In this setting, (i) the optimal R&D program is defined by a research trigger condition in which the decision-maker's belief about the probability of finding a backstop enters in an intuitive way; (ii) a decreasing probability of finding a backstop leads to the toleration of higher pollution levels, slower R&D, a slower turnover of technologies, and an ambiguous effect on the expected number of innovations; (iii) learning about the probability of a backstop is driven by failures only and leads to decreasing research incentives; and (iv) small to moderate delays in the resolution of technological uncertainty do not affect the optimal policy. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:800 / 809
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Research on R&D investment decision making under uncertainty of technology and price
    [J]. 1720, Systems Engineering Society of China (37):
  • [42] Option-game Analysis in R&D Investment under Demand Uncertainty
    An, Shi
    Tun, Ji-yuan
    [J]. ADVANCES IN BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE AND FINANCIAL ENGINEERING, 2008, 5 : 217 - 221
  • [43] The contribution of Design Thinking to the R of R&D in technological innovation
    Magistretti, Stefano
    Dell'Era, Claudio
    Verganti, Roberto
    Bianchi, Mattia
    [J]. R & D MANAGEMENT, 2022, 52 (01) : 108 - 125
  • [44] Impacts of environmental uncertainty and firms' capabilities on R&D investment: Evidence from China
    Su, Zhongfeng
    Xie, En
    Peng, Jisheng
    [J]. INNOVATION-ORGANIZATION & MANAGEMENT, 2010, 12 (03): : 269 - 282
  • [45] Uncertainty, Flexible Labour Relations and R&D
    Di Cintio, Marco
    Grassi, Emanuele
    [J]. METROECONOMICA, 2017, 68 (01) : 91 - 120
  • [46] Does R&D create or resolve uncertainty?
    Blazenko, George
    Yeung, Wing Him
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RISK FINANCE, 2015, 16 (05) : 536 - 553
  • [47] R&D Investment, Patent Length, Uncertainty
    Xue Minggao
    Su Lili
    Gao Guan
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, VOLS I AND II, 2009, : 461 - 472
  • [48] Are you a leader in environmental R&D?
    Slowinski, G
    Chatterji, D
    Tshudy, JA
    Fridley, DL
    [J]. RESEARCH-TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 1997, 40 (03) : 47 - 54
  • [49] The organization of R&D and environmental policy
    Poyago-Theotoky, J. A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2007, 62 (01) : 63 - 75
  • [50] A decision model for environmental R&D
    Chao, HP
    Peck, S
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 1999, 25 (6-7) : 871 - 886