Bed rest versus free mobilisation following embryo transfer:: a prospective randomised study

被引:23
|
作者
Amarin, ZO
Obeidat, BR
机构
[1] Jordan Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Irbid, Jordan
[2] Fakeeh Hosp, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00346.x
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective To evaluate the efficacy of two clinical methods of post-embryo transfer protocols in patients undergoing in vitro fertilisation. Design Prospective, randomised clinical trial. Setting Hospital-based clinic for reproductive medicine. Sample Women under 40 years of age who were undergoing in vitro fertilisation with GnRH pituitary down-regulation and controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. Methods Patients were randomised to rest for either 1 or 24 hours after embryo transfer. Main outcome measure Clinical pregnancy per cycle rate (the percentage of cycles started that demonstrated a live fetus on ultrasound examination performed at six or seven weeks of gestation). Results The clinical pregnancy rates were 21.5% for the 1-hour and 18.2% for the 24-hour post-embryo transfer groups. The implantation rate per embryo was significantly higher in the 1-hour group (14.4%) than in the 24-hour group (9%). Conclusion One-hour and 24-hour rest post-embryo transfer result in comparable rates of clinical pregnancy. However, 24-hour rest results in reduced implantation rate per embryo.
引用
收藏
页码:1273 / 1276
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] ELECTIVE SINGLE EMBRYO TRANSFER (ESET) VERSUS DOUBLE EMBRYO TRANSFER (DET) FOLLOWING FAILED MANDATORY SINGLE EMBRYO TRANSFER (MSET).
    Mancuso, A. C.
    Sparks, A. E.
    Duran, H. E.
    Van Voorhis, B. J.
    Kapfhamer, J.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2018, 110 (04) : E192 - E192
  • [32] ELECTIVE FROZEN VERSUS FRESH EMBRYO TRANSFER IN ANTAGONIST CYCLE IN NORMO-RESPONDERS: A RANDOMISED STUDY
    Nayar, K. D.
    Ahuja, R.
    Singh, M.
    Gupta, M.
    Kant, G.
    Sharma, N.
    Nayar, D.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2017, 108 (03) : E168 - E168
  • [33] Early mobilisation versus immobilisation of surgically treated ankle fractures. Prospective randomised control trial
    Dogra, AS
    Rangan, A
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 1999, 30 (06): : 417 - 419
  • [34] A randomized prospective study on blastocyst versus day 2-3 embryo transfer.
    Levron, J
    Bider, D
    Shulman, A
    Rabinovichi, Y
    Seidman, D
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2001, 76 (03) : S4 - S4
  • [35] Nurse/midwife versus doctor performing ultrasound guidance of embryo transfer: a prospective randomized study
    Rinaldi, L.
    Selman, H.
    Floccari, A.
    Ruggeri, M.
    Pacchiarotti, A.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2011, 26 : I258 - I259
  • [36] Early active mobilisation versus immobilisation after extrinsic extensor tendon repair: A prospective randomised trial
    Patil, R. K.
    Koul, A. R.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2012, 45 (01) : 29 - 37
  • [37] Mobilisation of epistaxis patients - a prospective, randomised study documenting a safe patient care regime
    Kristensen, Vibeke G.
    Nielsen, Annette L.
    Gaihede, Michael
    Boll, Birgitte
    Delmar, Charlotte
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2011, 20 (11-12) : 1598 - 1605
  • [38] Randomised clinical trial comparing elective single-embryo transfer followed by single-embryo cryotransfer versus double embryo transfer
    Luisa Lopez-Regalado, Maria
    Clavero, Ana
    Carmen Gonzalvo, Maria
    Serrano, Maria
    Martinez, Luis
    Mozas, Juan
    Rodriguez-Serrano, Fernando
    Fontes, Juan
    Castilla, Jose A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2014, 178 : 192 - 198
  • [39] Passive versus active drainage following neck dissection: a non-randomised prospective study
    Batstone, Martin Druce
    Lowe, Derek
    Shaw, Richard J.
    Brown, James S.
    Vaughan, E. David
    Rogers, Simon N.
    EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2009, 266 (01) : 121 - 124
  • [40] Passive versus active drainage following neck dissection: a non-randomised prospective study
    Martin Druce Batstone
    Derek Lowe
    Richard J. Shaw
    James S. Brown
    E. David Vaughan
    Simon N. Rogers
    European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2009, 266 : 121 - 124