Cumulative reproductive outcome after preimplantation genetic diagnosis: a report on 1498 couples

被引:31
|
作者
Verpoest, W. [1 ]
Haentjens, P. [2 ,3 ]
De Rycke, M. [4 ]
Staessen, C. [4 ]
Sermon, K. [5 ]
Bonduelle, M. [4 ]
Devroey, P. [1 ]
Liebaers, I. [4 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Brussel, Ctr Reprod Med, Univ Ziekenhuis Brussel, B-1090 Brussels, Belgium
[2] Vrije Univ Brussel, Ctr Outcomes Res, Univ Ziekenhuis Brussel, B-1090 Brussels, Belgium
[3] Vrije Univ Brussel, Expt Surg Lab, Univ Ziekenhuis Brussel, B-1090 Brussels, Belgium
[4] Vrije Univ Brussel, Ctr Med Genet, Univ Ziekenhuis Brussel, B-1090 Brussels, Belgium
[5] Vrije Univ Brussel, Dept Embryol & Genet, B-1090 Brussels, Belgium
关键词
ICSI; PGD; pregnancy; cumulative delivery rate; life table analysis; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; INTRACYTOPLASMIC SPERM INJECTION; PREGNANCY RATES; INFERTILITY TREATMENT; CLINICAL-EXPERIENCE; SITU HYBRIDIZATION; FOLLOW-UP; PGD; CYCLES; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1093/humrep/dep272
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Couples undergoing preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) have a different background and set of treatment characteristics to couples undergoing regular IVF or ICSI. The aim of this study was to analyse the cumulative reproductive outcome of a large cohort of couples undergoing PGD in relation to a number of explanatory variables potentially affecting the prognosis. METHODS: Prospective cohort study, Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to estimate real (observed) and expected (calculated) cumulative delivery rates, and Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was used to assess the effect of age, number of cumulus oocyte complexes collected, fertility status, parity, genetic category and method of pituitary suppression. RESULTS: Between 1993 and 2005, 2753 unselected consecutive cycles of ICSI and PGD were carried out in 1498 couples. The cumulative observed delivery rate overall per couple with a maximum of six treatment cycles of ICSI and PGD performed was 29%. The expected cumulative delivery rate (max six cycles) overall was 62%. There were no significant differences in cumulative delivery rates between the different genetic categories (i.e. availability of transferable embryos after PGD of 50 or 75%, chromosomal translocations or aneuploidy screening). The cumulative reproductive outcome in this PGD cohort was also not significantly affected by the fertility status of the couple, their parity or the method of pituitary suppression. However, the age of the patient and the number of oocytes contributed significantly to the reproductive results. CONCLUSION: This prospective observational study demonstrates that age has a significantly negative effect on outcome of PGD, due to poor reproductive performance of female partners 40 years of age and older. The number of oocytes collected has a significant and independent effect. The other factors studied did not affect the cumulative reproductive outcome in this PGD cohort.
引用
收藏
页码:2951 / 2959
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Neonatal outcome after preimplantation genetic diagnosis
    Eldar-Geva, Talia
    Srebnik, Naama
    Altarescu, Gheona
    Varshaver, Irit
    Brooks, Baruch
    Levy-Lahad, Ephrat
    Bromiker, Ruben
    Schimmel, Michael S.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2014, 102 (04) : 1016 - 1021
  • [2] Impact of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for chromosomal disorders on reproductive outcome
    Kuliev, Anver
    Verlinsky, Yury
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2008, 16 (01) : 9 - 10
  • [3] Attitudes of couples presenting for assisted reproductive technology towards preimplantation genetic diagnosis
    Katz, M. G.
    Fitzgerald, L.
    Bankier, A.
    Cram, D. S.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2001, 16 : 82 - 82
  • [4] Reproductive and obstetric outcome of 2218 ICSI cycles with preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) or preimplantation genetic screening (PGS)
    Verpoest, W.
    Papanikolaou, E.
    Boelaert, K.
    Donoso, P.
    Staessen, C.
    Sermon, K.
    Van Steirteghem, A.
    Bonduelle, M.
    Devroey, P.
    Liebaers, I.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2006, 21 : I201 - I202
  • [5] Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for couples with chromosomal rearrangements
    Fernandez Gracia, E.
    Navarro Ferrete, J.
    Lopez-Escribano, H.
    Dela Fuente, A.
    [J]. CHROMOSOME RESEARCH, 2005, 13 : 141 - 141
  • [6] Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and reproductive autonomy
    Krahn, T.
    Wong, S. I.
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2009, 19 : 34 - 42
  • [7] Preimplantation genetic diagnosis of chromosome abnormalities: implications from the outcome for couples with chromosomal rearrangements
    Simopoulou, M
    Harper, JC
    Fragouli, E
    Mantzouratou, A
    Speyer, BE
    Serhal, P
    Ranieri, DM
    Doshi, A
    Henderson, J
    Rodeck, CH
    Delhanty, JDA
    [J]. PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2003, 23 (08) : 652 - 662
  • [8] Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening in patients with poor reproductive outcome.
    Kim, J
    Lim, C
    Jun, J
    Cha, S
    Koong, M
    Kang, I
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2005, 84 : S340 - S340
  • [9] Prognostic role of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy in assisted reproductive technology outcome
    Ferraretti, AP
    Magli, MC
    Kopcow, L
    Gianaroli, L
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2004, 19 (03) : 694 - 699
  • [10] Awareness and acceptability of preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) as a reproductive option among BRCA carrier couples
    Habets, J. J. G.
    Derks-Smeets, I. A. P.
    Tibben, A.
    Tjan-Heijnen, V. C. G.
    Geraedts, J. P. M.
    van Golde, R.
    Gomez-Garcia, E.
    Kets, C. M.
    de Die-Smulders, C. E. M.
    van Osch, L. A. D. M.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2013, 28 : 264 - 264