Prognostic role of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy in assisted reproductive technology outcome

被引:41
|
作者
Ferraretti, AP
Magli, MC
Kopcow, L
Gianaroli, L
机构
[1] SISMeR, Reprod Med Unit, I-40138 Bologna, Italy
[2] IFER, Reprod Med Unit, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
关键词
aneuploidy; fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH); IVF; poor prognosis; preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD);
D O I
10.1093/humrep/deh121
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for aneuploidy is recommended to couples at risk of generating chromosomally abnormal embryos. The aim of this study was to demonstrate that PGD for aneuploidy has an important role in the prognosis of subsequent treatments. Methods: A total of 389 couples underwent their first PGD for aneuploidy due to either female age greater than or equal to38 years (n=266) or greater than or equal to3 previous unsuccessful cycles (n=123). After the first PGD followed by an unsuccessful treatment cycle, 141 couples underwent 175 subsequent PGD cycles. These patients were divided into three groups depending on the number of euploid embryos available for transfer in their first PGD cycle: group A included patients where no euploid embryos were diagnosed; group B included patients who had only one euploid embryo; and group C included patients with at least two normal embryos resulting from chromosomal analysis. Results: In subsequent cycles, group A patients underwent significantly fewer transfers (45%) compared with group B (69%, P<0.05) and group C patients (85%, P<0.001). The pregnancy rate per transfer was significantly decreased in group A (15%) compared with group B (36%; P<0.02) and group C (30%; P<0.03). Accordingly, the live birth rate per patient was significantly lower in group A compared with group C (8.5% versus 30%; P<0.005). Conclusions: The outcome of the first PGD for aneuploidy may have a predictive role for subsequent attempts.
引用
收藏
页码:694 / 699
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening in patients with poor reproductive outcome.
    Kim, J
    Lim, C
    Jun, J
    Cha, S
    Koong, M
    Kang, I
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2005, 84 : S340 - S340
  • [2] Preimplantation genetic testing in assisted reproductive technology
    Romanelli, Valeria
    Poli, Maurizio
    Capalbo, Antonio
    [J]. PANMINERVA MEDICA, 2019, 61 (01) : 30 - 41
  • [3] The role of preimplantation genetic diagnosis in diagnosing embryo aneuploidy
    Munne, Santiago
    Howles, Collin M.
    Wells, Dagan
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 21 (05) : 442 - 449
  • [4] Attitudes of couples presenting for assisted reproductive technology towards preimplantation genetic diagnosis
    Katz, M. G.
    Fitzgerald, L.
    Bankier, A.
    Cram, D. S.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2001, 16 : 82 - 82
  • [5] Preimplantation genetic diagnosis as both a therapeutic and diagnostic tool in assisted reproductive technology
    Werlin, L
    Rodi, I
    DeCherney, A
    Marello, E
    Hill, D
    Munné, S
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2003, 80 (02) : 467 - 468
  • [6] Micromanipulation in assisted reproductive technology: Intracytoplasmic sperm injection, assisted hatching, and preimplantation genetic diagnosis
    Gosden, LV
    Yin, H
    [J]. CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 49 (01): : 73 - 84
  • [7] Preimplantation genetic diagnosis of aneuploidy and translocations
    Munne, S
    Marquez, C
    Fung, J
    Bahce, M
    Morrison, L
    Weier, U
    Cohen, J
    [J]. FERTILITY AND REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 1998, 1183 : 697 - 710
  • [8] Use of preimplantation genetic diagnosis and preimplantation genetic screening in the United States: a Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Writing Group paper
    Ginsburg, Elizabeth S.
    Baker, Valerie L.
    Racowsky, Catherine
    Wantman, Ethan
    Goldfarb, James
    Stern, Judy E.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2011, 96 (04) : 865 - 868
  • [9] Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) as both a diagnostic and therapeutic tool in assisted reproductive technology (ART).
    Werlin, LB
    DeCherney, A
    Rodi, I
    Hill, D
    Marello, E
    Munne, S
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2002, 78 (03) : S184 - S184
  • [10] Impact of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for chromosomal disorders on reproductive outcome
    Kuliev, Anver
    Verlinsky, Yury
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2008, 16 (01) : 9 - 10