Use of preimplantation genetic diagnosis and preimplantation genetic screening in the United States: a Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Writing Group paper

被引:36
|
作者
Ginsburg, Elizabeth S. [1 ]
Baker, Valerie L. [2 ]
Racowsky, Catherine [1 ]
Wantman, Ethan [3 ]
Goldfarb, James [4 ]
Stern, Judy E. [5 ]
机构
[1] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Biol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Stanford Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] Redshift Technol Inc, New York, NY USA
[4] Univ Hosp Cleveland, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[5] Dartmouth Hitchcock Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Lebanon, NH 03766 USA
关键词
Embryo biopsy; aneuploidy; elective sex selection; preimplantation genetic diagnosis; preimplantation genetic screening; translocation; ANEUPLOIDY; COUPLES;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.07.1139
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To comprehensively report Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART) member program usage of preimplantation genetic testing (PGT), preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for diagnosis of specific conditions, and preimplantation genetic screening for aneuploidy (PGS). Design: Retrospective study. Setting: United States SART cohort data. Patient(s): Women undergoing a PGT cycle in which at least one embryo underwent biopsy. Intervention(s): PGT. Main Outcome Measure(s): PGT use, indications, and delivery rates. Result(s): Of 190,260 fresh, nondonor assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycles reported to SART CORS in 2007-2008, 8,337 included PGT. Of 6,971 cycles with a defined indication, 1,382 cycles were for genetic diagnosis, 3,645 for aneuploidy screening (PGS), 527 for translocation, and 1,417 for elective sex election. Although the total number of fresh, autologous cycles increased by 3.6% from 2007 to 2008, the percentage of cycles with PGT decreased by 5.8% (4,293 in 2007 and 4,044 in 2008). As a percentage of fresh, nondonor ART cycles, use dropped from 4.6% (4,293/93,433) in 2007 to 4.2% (4,044/96,827) in 2008. The primary indication for PGT was PGS: cycles performed for this indication decreased (-8.0%). PGD use for single-gene defects (+3.2%), elective sex selection (+5.3%), and translocation analysis (+0.5%) increased. PGT usage varied significantly by geographical region. Conclusion(s): PGT usage in the United States decreased between 2007 and 2008 owing to a decrease in PGS. Use of elective sex selection increased. High transfer cancellation rates correlated with reduced live-birth rates for some PGT indications. (Fertil Steril (R) 2011;96:865-8. (C) 2011 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)
引用
收藏
页码:865 / 868
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Preimplantation Genetic Screening and Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis
    Sullivan-Pyke, Chantae
    Dokras, Anuja
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2018, 45 (01) : 113 - +
  • [2] Preimplantation genetic testing in assisted reproductive technology
    Romanelli, Valeria
    Poli, Maurizio
    Capalbo, Antonio
    [J]. PANMINERVA MEDICA, 2019, 61 (01) : 30 - 41
  • [3] Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and preimplantation screening : Update
    Bündgen N.
    Griesinger G.
    Diedrich K.
    [J]. Der Gynäkologe, 2011, 44 (2): : 100 - 107
  • [4] New perspectives on preimplantation genetic diagnosis and preimplantation genetic screening
    Chen, Chun-Kai
    Yu, Hsing-Tse
    Soong, Yung-Kuei
    Lee, Chyi-Long
    [J]. TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 53 (02): : 146 - 150
  • [5] Preimplantation diagnosis-PID, Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) and preimplantation genetic screening (PGS)
    Montag, M.
    Toth, B.
    Strowitzki, T.
    [J]. BUNDESGESUNDHEITSBLATT-GESUNDHEITSFORSCHUNG-GESUNDHEITSSCHUTZ, 2013, 56 (12) : 1670 - 1678
  • [6] The use of arrays in preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening
    Harper, Joyce C.
    Harton, Gary
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2010, 94 (04) : 1173 - 1177
  • [7] Prognostic role of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy in assisted reproductive technology outcome
    Ferraretti, AP
    Magli, MC
    Kopcow, L
    Gianaroli, L
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2004, 19 (03) : 694 - 699
  • [8] Attitudes of couples presenting for assisted reproductive technology towards preimplantation genetic diagnosis
    Katz, M. G.
    Fitzgerald, L.
    Bankier, A.
    Cram, D. S.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2001, 16 : 82 - 82
  • [9] Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening
    Kearns, WG
    Pen, R
    Graham, J
    Han, T
    Carter, J
    Moyer, M
    Richter, KS
    Tucker, M
    Hoegerman, SF
    Widra, E
    [J]. SEMINARS IN REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 2005, 23 (04) : 336 - 347
  • [10] Preimplantation genetic diagnosis as both a therapeutic and diagnostic tool in assisted reproductive technology
    Werlin, L
    Rodi, I
    DeCherney, A
    Marello, E
    Hill, D
    Munné, S
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2003, 80 (02) : 467 - 468