A flexible tool to prioritize areas for conservation combining landscape units, measures of biodiversity, and threats

被引:5
|
作者
Ondei, Stefania [1 ]
Brook, Barry W. [1 ,2 ]
Buettel, Jessie C. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tasmania, Sch Nat Sci, Hobart, Tas 7000, Australia
[2] Ctr Excellence Australian Biodivers & Heritage CA, Hobart, Tas 7000, Australia
来源
ECOSPHERE | 2019年 / 10卷 / 09期
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Australia; bioregionalization; Interim Biogeographic Regionalization for Australia; invasive species; irreplaceability; land-use change; nature conservation; threatened species; vulnerability; LAND-USE CHANGE; SPECIES DISTRIBUTION; PROTECTED AREAS; GAP ANALYSIS; VULNERABILITY; ECOLOGY; CLIMATE; IRREPLACEABILITY; SYSTEM; DIVERSITY;
D O I
10.1002/ecs2.2859
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Expanding the reserve system is a key strategy to enhance biodiversity protection. Yet, conservation outcomes can be undermined by underrepresentation of some habitats and opportunistic placement of protected areas. Irreplaceability and vulnerability, the key principles of conservation, should thus be combined within a bioregionalization framework to implement protection in the habitats that most need it. We proposed a simple and flexible method to prioritize bioregions for conservation based on these principles and used it to rank the 85 bioregions of the Australian continent. To do so, we quantified biodiversity values and threats in each bioregion by gathering open-access data on species, landscapes, and land use. Bioregions were then ranked using a set of customizable scenarios, including ecologically meaningful combinations of measures of irreplaceability and vulnerability. To identify biodiverse areas under threat but potentially overlooked, we compared our results with the location of already established biodiversity hotspots (i.e., areas identified as important for biodiversity and under threat). We found that bioregions with the highest biodiversity values are predominantly located in the southwest, east, and north of the continent. Similarly, threats, particularly land clearance, are concentrated along the east coast and in the southwest. When ranking bioregions using scenarios including both threats and biodiversity values, the majority (75%) of the highest-ranking bioregions were already included in biodiversity hotspots. For five of these bioregions, the proportion of protected land to date still falls below the 17% recommended by the Convention on Biological Diversity and thus they likely require prompt prioritization and intervention. The method proposed can support ongoing monitoring and prioritization of land units for conservation. Its simplicity and flexibility mean it can be easily adopted for different areas and adjusted to local priorities.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] The relative conservation impact of strategies that prioritize biodiversity representation, threats, and protection costs
    Sacre, Edmond
    Weeks, Rebecca
    Bode, Michael
    Pressey, Robert L.
    [J]. CONSERVATION SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2020, 2 (08)
  • [2] Marine biodiversity in China - Recent threats and conservation measures
    Zhu, MY
    Li, RX
    Xia, B
    [J]. OCEAN SCIENCES BRIDGING THE MILLENNIA: A SPECTRUM OF HISTORICAL ACCOUNTS, 2004, : 449 - 456
  • [3] Multicriteria approach to prioritize forest restoration areas for biodiversity conservation in the eastern Amazon
    Lopes Cavalcante, Rosane Barbosa
    Nunes, Samia
    Viademonte, Sergio
    Flexa Rodrigues, Caio Marcos
    Gomes, Walisson Cardoso
    Ferreira Jr, Jair da Silva
    Monteiro Pontes, Paulo Rogenes
    Giannini, Tereza Cristina
    Awade, Marcelo
    Miranda, Leonardo de S.
    Nascimento Jr, Wilson R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2022, 318
  • [4] A landscape triage approach: combining spatial and temporal dynamics to prioritize restoration and conservation
    Rappaport, Danielle I.
    Tambosi, Leandro R.
    Metzger, Jean P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2015, 52 (03) : 590 - 601
  • [5] Using landscape habitat associations to prioritize areas of conservation action for terrestrial birds
    Harms, Tyler M.
    Murphy, Kevin T.
    Lyu, Xiaodan
    Patterson, Shane S.
    Kinkead, Karen E.
    Dinsmore, Stephen J.
    Frese, Paul W.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (03):
  • [6] Integrating climate and landscape models to prioritize areas and conservation strategies for an endangered arboreal primate
    Cabral Rezende, Gabriela
    Sobral-Souza, Thadeu
    Culot, Laurence
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PRIMATOLOGY, 2020, 82 (12)
  • [7] Landscape, Legal, and Biodiversity Threats that Windows Pose to Birds: A Review of an Important Conservation Issue
    Klem, Daniel, Jr.
    [J]. LAND, 2014, 3 (01) : 351 - 361
  • [8] Evaluating the conservation priority of key biodiversity areas based on ecosystem conditions and anthropogenic threats in rapidly urbanizing areas
    Wang, Yichao
    Zhu, Luping
    Yang, Xiao
    Zhang, Xiaojun
    Wang, Xin
    Pei, Jinling
    Zhou, Lixuan
    Luo, Zhaohui
    Fang, Qiaoli
    Liang, Mingyi
    Yu, Xijun
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2022, 142
  • [9] Combining Landscape-Level Conservation Planning and Biodiversity Offset Programs: A Case Study
    Jared G. Underwood
    [J]. Environmental Management, 2011, 47 : 121 - 129
  • [10] Combining Landscape-Level Conservation Planning and Biodiversity Offset Programs: A Case Study
    Underwood, Jared G.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2011, 47 (01) : 121 - 129