Infrastructure Project Investment Decision Timing Using a Real Options Analysis Framework with Rainbow Option

被引:4
|
作者
Siripongvakin, Jatupol [1 ]
Athigakunagorn, Nathee [1 ]
机构
[1] Kasetsart Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Fac Engn Kamphaeng Saen, Nakhon Pathom 73140, Thailand
关键词
Construction project investment; Decision timing; Real options analysis; Binomial method; Rainbow option; VALUATION;
D O I
10.1061/AJRUA6.0001080
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The infrastructure construction industry has always been plagued with significant uncertainty. It is therefore crucial for decision makers (DMs) to ascertain suitable investment timing, and there is still a need for a paradigm to assist them. Real options analysis (ROA) is a project evaluation method that allows DMs to incorporate volatility into their analyses. This study uses ROA to create a decision framework to determine the optimal infrastructure investment decision timing. Two types of ROA, the traditional option and the rainbow option, are used in the analysis to examine the impacts of these methods on timing. The paper's case study involves construction of a gas station in the Bangkok metropolitan region and takes the price of and demand for gas as the sources of uncertainty. The paper also carries out a loss value analysis. The results suggest that the DM should postpone the decision further when volatility increases due to a "wait-and-see" strategy. We introduce loss value to compensate for depreciation in the value of the project due to deferment. The results of the evaluation and the sensitivity analysis confirm that compared to nonconsideration of investment value, consideration can lead to an earlier optimal time for the investment. (C) 2020 American Society of Civil Engineers.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Real options application and sensitivity analysis in investment decision-making
    Culik, Miroslav
    FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT OF FIRMS AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS: 9TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, PTS I-III, 2013, : 117 - 128
  • [42] The application of real option in decision making of real estate investment
    Gao, H
    Yu, XF
    PROCEEDINGS OF CRIOCM 2005 INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH SYMPOSIUM ON ADVANCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND REAL ESTATE, 2005, : 418 - 421
  • [43] The effect of uncertainty on investment timing in a real options model
    Wong, Kit Pong
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC DYNAMICS & CONTROL, 2007, 31 (07): : 2152 - 2167
  • [44] Decision Support Framework for Infrastructure Maintenance Investment Decision Making
    Arif, Farrukh
    Bayraktar, Mehmet Emre
    Chowdhury, Arindam G.
    JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT IN ENGINEERING, 2016, 32 (01)
  • [45] The Application of Fuzzy-Real Option Theory in BOT Project Investment Decision-making
    Bi, X.
    Wang, X. F.
    2009 IEEE 16TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1 AND 2, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 289 - 293
  • [46] A fuzzy real option approach for investment project valuation
    Ho, Shiu-Hwei
    Liao, Shu-Hsien
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2011, 38 (12) : 15296 - 15302
  • [47] Real Option Model Application and Sensitivity Analysis in Mineral Resources Investment Project
    Tan, Wenbo
    Liu, Haibin
    Zhang, Wei
    2009 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, INNOVATION MANAGEMENT AND INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, VOL 4, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 200 - +
  • [48] Real option methods in options of scale for electric generation investment
    Li, Kaihai
    Guo, Yaohuang
    Jiang, Yan
    Dianli Xitong Zidonghua/Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2006, 30 (23): : 48 - 52
  • [49] Sensitivity Analysis of Real Options in Infrastructure Public-Private-Partnership Project
    Li, Mingshun
    Chen, Tao
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 4TH CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS SCIENCE, MANAGEMENT SCIENCE AND SYSTEMS DYNAMICS, SSMSSD10, VOL 2, 2011, : 171 - 178
  • [50] A Real Options-Based Decision-Making Model for Infrastructure Investment to Prevent Rainstorm Disasters
    Wang, Tao
    Liu, Bingsheng
    Zhang, Jiaming
    Li, Guijun
    PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2019, 28 (11) : 2699 - 2715