What Is the Case for Paid Maternity Leave?

被引:103
|
作者
Dahl, Gordon B. [1 ]
Loken, Katrine V. [2 ]
Mogstad, Magne [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Salvanes, Kari Vea [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[2] Univ Bergen, N-5020 Bergen, Norway
[3] Univ Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[4] Stat Norway, Oslo, Norway
[5] NBER, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[6] Univ Oslo, N-0316 Oslo, Norway
关键词
REGRESSION DISCONTINUITY DESIGNS; LONG-RUN OUTCOMES; PARENTAL LEAVE; UNITED-STATES; CHILDBIRTH; BENEFITS; TAXES;
D O I
10.1162/REST_a_00602
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We assess the case for generous government-funded maternity leave, focusing on a series of policy reforms in Norway that expanded paid leave from 18 to 35 weeks. We find the reforms do not crowd out unpaid leave and that mothers spend more time at home without a reduction in family income. The increased maternity leave has little effect on children's schooling, parental earnings and labor force participation, completed fertility, marriage, or divorce. The expansions, whose net costs amounted to 0.25% of GDP, have negative redistribution properties and imply a considerable increases in taxes at a cost to economic efficiency.
引用
收藏
页码:655 / 670
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条