The wild boar as a driver of human-wildlife conflict in the protected park lands of Nepal

被引:30
|
作者
Pandey, Pramod [1 ]
Shaner, Pei-Jen Lee [2 ]
Sharma, Hari Prasad [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Tribhuvan Univ, Cent Dept Zool, Kathmandu, Nepal
[2] Natl Taiwan Normal Univ, Dept Life Sci, Taipei, Taiwan
[3] Acad Sinica, Taiwan Int Grad Program, Biodivers Program, Taipei 115, Taiwan
关键词
Crop damage; Human livelihood; Net area damage; Sus scrofa; BARDIA-NATIONAL-PARK; SUS-SCROFA; LIVESTOCK DEPREDATION; CROP DAMAGE; PEOPLE RELATIONS; CONSERVATION; RESERVE; AREAS; PERCEPTIONS; COEXISTENCE;
D O I
10.1007/s10344-015-0978-5
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Long-term success of conservation in protected areas requires the cooperation and participation from local people, especially in developing countries where local people often endure most of the cost from human-wildlife conflict. This study investigated crop damage due to wildlife in Thanapati Village adjacent to Shivapuri Nagarjun National Park, Nepal. Household interviews and field measurements were conducted between March 2009 and April 2010 to quantify the actual area damaged by crop-raiding wildlife and the associated economic loss. Of the seven wildlife groups evaluated, we identified the wild boar as the primary crop raider, which is in agreement with several previous studies in the Indo-Himalaya region. Approximately US$24,000 (9 % of the expected profit) were lost to wildlife damage annually, with c. 0.28 km(2) (8 % of the farmlands) of crops damaged. We found that the local people's assessment of the primary crop raider (i.e., wild boar) and the area damaged by wildlife to be quite accurate. Considering the ecology of the wild boar (e.g., tolerant to human activities, striving along the edge of habitats, consuming as well as trampling of crops) and the socioeconomic situation in the surrounding villages of Shivapuri Nagarjun National Park (e.g., resource-dependent economy, small farmers), we believe the solution to reduce human-wildlife conflict in this case lies in the following: (1) the use of innovative methods to deter wild boars; (2) active management of population size and carrying capacity of wild boars, possibly through regulated hunting; and (3) a fair compensation scheme or alternative economic means to offset crop damage.
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 108
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Bibliometric analysis of human-wildlife conflict: From conflict to coexistence
    Su, Kaiwen
    Zhang, Han
    Lin, Lin
    Hou, Yilei
    Wen, Yali
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INFORMATICS, 2022, 68
  • [42] Compensation as a Policy for Mitigating Human-wildlife Conflict Around Four Protected Areas in Rajasthan, India
    Johnson, McKenzie F.
    Karanth, Krithi K.
    Weinthal, Erika
    [J]. CONSERVATION & SOCIETY, 2018, 16 (03): : 305 - 319
  • [43] Can forest fragmentation and configuration work as indicators of human-wildlife conflict? Evidences from human death and injury by wildlife attacks in Nepal
    Acharya, Krishna Prasad
    Paudel, Prakash Kumar
    Jnawali, Shant Raj
    Neupane, Prem Raj
    Koehl, Michael
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2017, 80 : 74 - 83
  • [44] Human-Wildlife Conflict Mitigation Impacts Community Perceptions around Kibale National Park, Uganda
    Kolinski, Lev
    Milich, Krista M.
    [J]. DIVERSITY-BASEL, 2021, 13 (04):
  • [45] Estimating the household costs of human-wildlife conflict in China's giant panda national park
    Ma, Ben
    Cai, Zhen
    Hou, Yilei
    Wen, Yali
    [J]. JOURNAL FOR NATURE CONSERVATION, 2023, 73
  • [46] Marine heatwave challenges solutions to human-wildlife conflict
    Samhouri, Jameal F.
    Feist, Blake E.
    Fisher, Mary C.
    Liu, Owen
    Woodman, Samuel M.
    Abrahms, Briana
    Forney, Karin A.
    Hazen, Elliott L.
    Lawson, Dan
    Redfern, Jessica
    Saez, Lauren E.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2021, 288 (1964)
  • [47] Human-Wildlife Interactions: Turning Conflict into Coexistence.
    Cork, Susan Catherine
    [J]. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2020, 34 (04) : 1051 - 1052
  • [48] Climate change as a global amplifier of human-wildlife conflict
    Abrahms, Briana
    Carter, Neil H. H.
    Clark-Wolf, T. J.
    Gaynor, Kaitlyn M. M.
    Johansson, Erik
    McInturff, Alex
    Nisi, Anna C. C.
    Rafiq, Kasim
    West, Leigh
    [J]. NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2023, 13 (03) : 224 - +
  • [49] Environmental factors affecting the distribution of the wild boar, sika deer, Asiatic black bear and Japanese macaque in central Japan, with implications for human-wildlife conflict
    Honda, Takeshi
    [J]. MAMMAL STUDY, 2009, 34 (02) : 107 - 116
  • [50] An experimental test of community-based strategies for mitigating human-wildlife conflict around protected areas
    Branco, Paola S.
    Merkle, Jerod A.
    Pringle, Robert M.
    King, Lucy
    Tindall, Tosca
    Stalmans, Marc
    Long, Ryan A.
    [J]. CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2020, 13 (01):