Improving women's knowledge about prenatal screening in the era of non-invasive prenatal testing for Down syndrome - development and acceptability of a low literacy decision aid

被引:23
|
作者
Smith, Sian Karen [1 ]
Cai, Antonia [1 ]
Wong, Michelle [1 ]
Sousa, Mariana S. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Peate, Michelle [4 ]
Welsh, Alec [5 ,6 ]
Meiser, Bettina [1 ]
Kaur, Rajneesh [1 ]
Halliday, Jane [7 ,8 ]
Lewis, Sharon [7 ]
Trevena, Lyndal [9 ]
Yanes, Tatiane [10 ]
Barlow-Stewart, Kristine [11 ]
Barclay, Margot [12 ,13 ]
机构
[1] UNSW Sydney, Prince Wales Clin Sch, Fac Med, Psychosocial Res Grp,Lowy Res Ctr, C25,Corner High & Bot St, Sydney, NSW 2033, Australia
[2] Western Sydney Univ, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Ctr Appl Nursing Res, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] South Western Sydney Local Hlth Dist, Inst Appl Med Res, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ Melbourne, Royal Womens Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[5] UNSW Sydney, Sch Womens & Childrens Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[6] Royal Hosp Women, Dept Maternal Fetal Med, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[7] Royal Childrens Hosp, Murdoch Childrens Res Inst, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[8] Univ Melbourne, Dept Paediat, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[9] Univ Sydney, Sydney Sch Publ Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[10] UNSW Sydney, Sch Psychiat, Fac Med, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[11] Univ Sydney, Sydney Med Sch, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[12] Liverpool Hosp, Womens Serv, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[13] Western Sydney Univ, Sydney, NSW, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会; 澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究理事会;
关键词
Decision aid; Informed decision-making; Prenatal screening; Prenatal testing; Trisomy; 21; Down syndrome; Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT); Low literacy; FETAL ABNORMALITIES; HEALTH; TRIAL; CARE; PROFESSIONALS; PREFERENCES; INFORMATION; ANEUPLOIDY; DIAGNOSIS; PARTNERS;
D O I
10.1186/s12884-018-2135-0
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BackgroundAccess to information about prenatal screening is important particularly in light of new techniques such as non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT). This study aimed to develop and examine the acceptability of a low literacy decision aid (DA) about Down syndrome screening among pregnant women with varying education levels and GPs.MethodsWe developed a DA booklet providing information about first-trimester combined testing, maternal serum screening, and NIPT. GPs and women participated in a telephone interview to examine the acceptability of the DA and measure screening knowledge before and after reading the DA. The knowledge measure was designed to assess whether women had understood the gist of the information presented in the decision aid. It comprised conceptual questions (e.g. screening tells you the chance of having a baby with Down syndrome) and numeric questions (e.g. the accuracy of different screening tests).ResultsTwenty-nine women and 18 GPs participated. Regardless of education level, most women found the booklet very' clearly presented (n=22, 76%), and very' informative (n=23, 80%). Overall, women's conceptual and numeric knowledge improved after exposure to the DA, from 4% having adequate knowledge to 69%. Women's knowledge of NIPT also improved after receiving the decision aid, irrespective of education. Most GPs found it very' clearly presented (n=13, 72%), and that it would very much' facilitate decision-making (n=16, 89%).ConclusionsThe DA was found to be acceptable to women as well as GPs. A comprehensive evaluation of the efficacy of the decision aid compared to standard information is an important next step. Strategies are needed on how to implement the tool in practice.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Prenatal screening in the era of non-invasive prenatal testing: a Nationwide cross-sectional survey of obstetrician knowledge, attitudes and clinical practice
    Liying Yang
    Wei Ching Tan
    [J]. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 20
  • [22] Prenatal screening in the era of non-invasive prenatal testing: a Nationwide cross-sectional survey of obstetrician knowledge, attitudes and clinical practice
    Yang, Liying
    Tan, Wei Ching
    [J]. BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [23] What Do Parents of Children with Down Syndrome Think about Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT)?
    van Schendel, Rachel V.
    Kater-Kuipers, Adriana
    van Vliet-Lachotzki, Elsbeth H.
    Dondorp, Wybo J.
    Cornel, Martina C.
    Henneman, Lidewij
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENETIC COUNSELING, 2017, 26 (03) : 522 - 531
  • [24] Advantages and Disadvantages of Different Implementation Strategies of Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing in Down Syndrome Screening Programmes
    Mersy, Elke
    de Die-Smulders, Christine E. M.
    Coumans, Audrey B. C.
    Smits, Luc J. M.
    de Wert, Guido M. W. R.
    Frints, Suzanna G. M.
    Veltman, Joris A.
    [J]. PUBLIC HEALTH GENOMICS, 2015, 18 (05) : 260 - 271
  • [25] Non-invasive prenatal testing: use of cell-free fetal DNA in Down syndrome screening
    Rafi, Imran
    Hill, Melissa
    Hayward, Judith
    Chitty, Lyn S.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2017, 67 (660): : 298 - +
  • [26] A cost-effectiveness analysis of using non-invasive prenatal testing as a screening tool for Down syndrome
    Ohno, Mika
    Allen, Allison
    Cheng, Yvonne
    Shaffer, Brian
    Blumenfeld, Yair
    Norton, Mary
    Caughey, Aaron
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 208 (01) : S235 - S235
  • [27] COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF NON-INVASIVE PRENATAL TESTING FOR DOWN'S SYNDROME IN CHINA
    Xu, Y.
    Chen, Y.
    Li, N.
    Ming, J.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2016, 19 (07) : A875 - A876
  • [28] Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis of Down's syndrome - Authors' reply
    Dhallan, Ravinder
    Guo, Xin
    Emche, Sarah
    Damewood, Marian
    Bayliss, Philip
    [J]. LANCET, 2007, 369 (9578): : 1998 - 1999
  • [29] Decision-making for non-invasive prenatal testing for Down syndrome: Hong Kong Chinese women's preferences for individual vs relational autonomy
    Lau, J. Y. C.
    Yi, H.
    Ahmed, S.
    [J]. CLINICAL GENETICS, 2016, 89 (05) : 550 - 556
  • [30] Attitudes of pregnant women and male partners towards non-invasive prenatal testing and widening the scope of prenatal screening
    Rachèl V van Schendel
    Johanna H Kleinveld
    Wybo J Dondorp
    Eva Pajkrt
    Danielle R M Timmermans
    Kim C A Holtkamp
    Margreet Karsten
    Anne L Vlietstra
    Augusta M A Lachmeijer
    Lidewij Henneman
    [J]. European Journal of Human Genetics, 2014, 22 : 1345 - 1350