Comparative techno-economic analysis of algal biofuel production via hydrothermal liquefaction: One stage versus two stages

被引:45
|
作者
Gu, Xiangyu [1 ,2 ]
Yu, Liang [1 ]
Pang, Na [1 ]
Martinez-Fernandez, Jose Salomon [1 ]
Fu, Xiao [1 ]
Chen, Shulin [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington State Univ, Dept Biol Syst Engn, Pullman, WA 99164 USA
[2] Washington State Univ, Gene & Linda Voiland Sch Chem Engn & Bioengn, Pullman, WA 99164 USA
关键词
Techno-economic analysis; Hydrothermal liquefaction; Algal biofuels; Aspen simulation; Co-products; LIFE-CYCLE; BIO-OIL; CHLORELLA-SOROKINIANA; WASTE-WATER; MICROALGAE; BIOMASS; FUELS; POLYSACCHARIDES; EXTRACTION; CONVERSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114115
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Hydrothermal liquefaction is a promising process for conversion of algae to bio-oil that is especially suitable for the high moisture content of algal feedstock. A two-stage sequential hydrothermal liquefaction (SEQHTL) alternative was developed to facilitate production of co-products in addition to bio-oil at reduced temperatures and pressures compared with conventional one-stage direct hydrothermal liquefaction (DHTL). In this study, Aspen simulation and comprehensive techno-economic analysis were conducted for both SEQHTL and DHTL processes to assess their performance when used to convert the same algal strain (Chlorella sorokiniana) to bio-oil intermediates. The technical and economic evaluation also included the subsequent upgrading of the bio-crude to biofuels via hydrotreatment. The minimum fuel selling price for SEQHTL and DHTL was $1.61/L, and $2.10/L, respectively. The milder operating conditions of SEQHTL process resulted in both reduced capital and operating cost. The total installed cost of the facilities for hydrothermal processing 1215 metric tons/day of algae was $89 million for SEQHTL and $112 million for DHTL. A higher energy returned on energy invested was realized by SEQHTL (6.73) owing to its greater amount of fuel blendstock produced and less energy required for production in comparison with DHTL (5.31). The sensitivity analysis showed that improving the yield and quality of both the bio-oil and co-products, as well as increasing the feed concentration, may lead to a much lower production cost. This study provided new insights of hydrothermal liquefaction process design with highlighting the potential of recycling of nutrient streams and fractionation algal biomass at milder operating conditions.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Techno-economic analysis of aniline production via amination of phenol
    Bugosen, Sergio
    Mantilla, Ivan D.
    Tarazona-Vasquez, Francisco
    [J]. HELIYON, 2020, 6 (12)
  • [32] Techno-economic feasibility and life cycle assessment of dairy effluent to renewable diesel via hydrothermal liquefaction
    Summers, Hailey M.
    Ledbetter, Rhesa N.
    McCurdy, Alex T.
    Morgan, Michael R.
    Seefeldt, Lance C.
    Jena, Umakanta
    Hoekman, S. Kent
    Quinn, Jason C.
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 196 : 431 - 440
  • [33] Techno-economic Assessment of Integrated Hydrothermal Liquefaction and Combined Heat and Power Production from Lignocellulose Residues
    Magdeldin, Mohamed
    Kohl, Thomas
    Jarvinen, Mika
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF ENERGY WATER AND ENVIRONMENT SYSTEMS-JSDEWES, 2018, 6 (01): : 89 - 113
  • [34] Techno-Economic Assessment and Sensitivity Analysis of Glycerol Valorization to Biofuel Additives via Esterification
    Pandit, Krutarth
    Jeffrey, Callum
    Keogh, John
    Tiwari, Manishkumar S.
    Artioli, Nancy
    Manyar, Haresh G.
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2023, 62 (23) : 9201 - 9210
  • [35] Techno-economic analysis of advanced biofuel production based on bio-oil gasification
    Li, Qi
    Zhang, Yanan
    Hu, Guiping
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 191 : 88 - 96
  • [36] Proposal for biorefineries based on mixed cultures for lignocellulosic biofuel production: a techno-economic analysis
    Valdez-Vazquez, Idania
    Sanchez, Arturo
    [J]. BIOFUELS BIOPRODUCTS & BIOREFINING-BIOFPR, 2018, 12 (01): : 56 - 67
  • [37] Techno-economic and uncertainty analysis of in situ and ex situ fast pyrolysis for biofuel production
    Li, Boyan
    Ou, Longwen
    Dang, Qi
    Meyer, Pimphan
    Jones, Susanne
    Brown, Robert
    Wright, Mark
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 196 : 49 - 56
  • [38] Techno-economic analysis of a renewable quadruple hybrid system for efficient water/biofuel production
    Taheri, Peyman
    Zahedi, Ali Reza
    [J]. SOLAR ENERGY, 2020, 211 : 1053 - 1069
  • [39] A comparative techno-economic assessment of fast pyrolysis, hydrothermal liquefaction, and intermediate pyrolysis of municipal solid waste for liquid transportation fuels production
    Rahman, Wasel-Ur
    Patel, Madhumita
    Kurian, Vinoj
    Kumar, Amit
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 267
  • [40] A comparative techno-economic assessment of fast pyrolysis, hydrothermal liquefaction, and intermediate pyrolysis of municipal solid waste for liquid transportation fuels production
    Rahman, Wasel-Ur
    Patel, Madhumita
    Kurian, Vinoj
    Kumar, Amit
    [J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2022, 267