The use of genetic markers to measure genomic response to selection in livestock

被引:0
|
作者
Gomez-Raya, L
Olsen, HG
Lingaas, F
Klungland, H
Våge, DI
Olsaker, I
Talle, SB
Aasland, M
Lien, S
机构
[1] IRTA, Ctr Udl, Area Prod Anim, Lleida 25198, Spain
[2] Agr Univ Norway, Dept Anim Sci, N-1432 As, Norway
[3] Norwegian Sch Vet Sci, Dept Morphol Genet & Aquat Biol, N-0033 Oslo, Norway
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
A method to measure genomic response to natural and artificial selection by means of genetic markers in livestock is proposed. Genomic response through several levels of selection was measured using sequential testing for distorted segregation of alleles among selected and nonselected sons, single-sperm typing, and a test with records for growth performance. Statistical power at a significance level of 0.05 was >0.5 for a marker linked to a QTL with recombination fractions 0, 0.10, and 0.20 for detecting genomic responses for gene effects of 0.6, 0.7, and 1.0 phenotypic standard deviations, respectively. Genomic response to artificial selection in six commercial bull sire families comprising 285 half-sib sons selected for growth performance was measured using 282 genetic markers evenly distributed over the cattle genome. A genome-wide test using selected sons was significant (P < 0.001), indicating that selection induces changes in the genetic makeup of commercial cattle populations. Markers located in chromosomes 6, 10, and 16 identified regions in those chromosomes that are changing due to artificial selection as revealed by the association of records of performance with alleles at specific markers. Either natural selection or genetic drift may cause the observed genomic response for markers in chromosomes 1, 7, and 17.
引用
收藏
页码:1381 / 1388
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] ASSESSMENT AND SELECTION OF COWS OF FUTURE MOTHERS OF SIMMENTAL BULLS WITH THE USE OF GENETIC MARKERS
    Foksha, Valentin
    Konstandoglo, Alexandra
    Kurulyuk, Vasily
    Geletsky, Natalya
    SCIENTIFIC PAPERS-SERIES D-ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2023, 66 (01): : 20 - 26
  • [32] THE USE OF SELECTION AND COUNTER-SELECTION IN MICROCELL-MEDIATED TRANSFER OF DOMINANT GENETIC-MARKERS
    WORTON, RG
    DUFF, C
    CYTOGENETICS AND CELL GENETICS, 1981, 29 (03): : 184 - 188
  • [33] The effect of genomic information on optimal contribution selection in livestock breeding programs
    Clark, Samuel A.
    Kinghorn, Brian P.
    Hickey, John M.
    van der Werf, Julius H. J.
    GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION, 2013, 45
  • [34] The effect of genomic information on optimal contribution selection in livestock breeding programs
    Samuel A Clark
    Brian P Kinghorn
    John M Hickey
    Julius HJ van der Werf
    Genetics Selection Evolution, 45
  • [35] The Impact of Genomic and Traditional Selection on the Contribution of Mutational Variance to Long-Term Selection Response and Genetic Variance
    Mulder, Herman A.
    Lee, Sang Hong
    Clark, Sam
    Hayes, Ben J.
    van der Werf, Julius H. J.
    GENETICS, 2019, 213 (02) : 361 - 378
  • [36] Potential Genetic Markers Associated with Environmental Adaptability in Herbivorous Livestock
    Liu, Xiaotong
    Peng, Yongdong
    Zhang, Xinhao
    Chen, Wenting
    Chen, Yinghui
    Wei, Lin
    Zhu, Qifei
    Khan, Muhammad Zahoor
    Wang, Changfa
    ANIMALS, 2025, 15 (05):
  • [37] Genetic markers and their application in livestock breeding in South Africa:: A review
    van Marle-Köster, E
    Nel, LH
    SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2003, 33 (01) : 1 - 10
  • [38] Livestock Genetic Resources: Preserving Genetic Adaptations for Future Use
    Gibson, John P.
    ADAPTATION AND FITNESS IN ANIMAL POPULATIONS, 2009, : 229 - 232
  • [39] Imputation of Unordered Markers and the Impact on Genomic Selection Accuracy
    Rutkoski, Jessica E.
    Poland, Jesse
    Jannink, Jean-Luc
    Sorrells, Mark E.
    G3-GENES GENOMES GENETICS, 2013, 3 (03): : 427 - 439
  • [40] Sunflower Hybrid Breeding: From Markers to Genomic Selection
    Dimitrijevic, Aleksandra
    Horn, Renate
    FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2018, 8