Ovarian stimulation to cryopreserve fertilized oocytes in cancer patients can be started in the luteal phase

被引:206
|
作者
von Wolff, Michael [1 ]
Thaler, Christian J. [2 ]
Frambach, Torsten [3 ]
Zeeb, Cosima [5 ]
Lawrenz, Barbara [4 ]
Popovici, Roxana M. [1 ]
Strowitzki, Thomas [1 ]
机构
[1] Heidelberg Univ, Dept Gynecol Endocrinol & Reprod Med, Womens Univ Hosp, D-69115 Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Univ Munich, Womens Hosp, Grosshadern, Germany
[3] Univ Wurzburg, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Wurzburg, Germany
[4] Univ Tubingen, Womens Hosp, Tubingen, Germany
[5] Womens Hosp St Gallen, Dept Gynecol Endocrinol & Reprod, St Gallen, Switzerland
关键词
Cancer; ovarian stimulation; fertility preservation; luteal phase; HORMONE-ANTAGONIST; CORPUS-LUTEUM; EXPERIENCE; LUTEOLYSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.08.011
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To analyze if oocytes can be obtained in all patients before cancer treatment within 2 weeks by initiating ovarian stimulation during the follicular or luteal phase. Design: Prospective controlled multicenter trial. Setting: Four university-based centers. Patient(s): Forty cancer patients before chemotherapy. Intervention(s): Twenty-eight patients were stimulated with gonadotropins in the follicular phase (group I). In 12 patients (group II), ovarian stimulation was initiated in the luteal phase, and these received GnRH antagonists and recombinant FSH. In 14 patients, 143 oocytes were further processed for fertilization by intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Main Outcome Measure(S): Number of oocytes aspirated after ovarian stimulation, cumulative FSH/hMG dosage, viability and maturity of oocytes, and fertilization rate by ICSI. Result(s): Patients in group I (age 27.6 +/- 4.9 yrs) were stimulated on average for 10.6 days, and patients in group II (age 31.2 +/- 5.7 yrs) for 11.4 days. Total amount of FSH was on average 2,255 IU (I) and 2,720 IU (II) per patient. Average and median numbers of aspirated oocytes were, respectively, 13.1 and 11.5 (I) versus 10.0 and 8.5 (II); 83.7% (I) and 80.4% (II) of the oocytes were mature and viable and could be treated by ICSI. Fertilization rate was 61.0% (I) versus 75.6% (II). Conclusion(S): This pilot study suggests that oocytes can be obtained before cancer treatment efficiently irrespective of the phase of the menstrual cycle. (Fertil Steril (R) 2009;92:1360-5. (C)2009 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)
引用
收藏
页码:1360 / 1365
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Luteal-phase ovarian stimulation vs conventional ovarian stimulation in patients with normal ovarian reserve treated for IVF: a large retrospective cohort study
    Wang, Ningling
    Wang, Yun
    Chen, Qiuju
    Dong, Jing
    Tian, Hui
    Fu, Yonglun
    Ai, Ai
    Lyu, Qifeng
    Kuang, Yanping
    [J]. CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2016, 84 (05) : 720 - 728
  • [22] The Ovarian Response After Follicular Versus Luteal Phase Stimulation with a Double Stimulation Strategy
    Bourdon, Mathilde
    Santulli, Pietro
    Maignien, Chloe
    Pocate-Cheriet, Khaled
    Marcellin, Louis
    Chen, Yulian
    Chapron, Charles
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2020, 27 (01) : 204 - 210
  • [23] The Ovarian Response After Follicular Versus Luteal Phase Stimulation with a Double Stimulation Strategy
    Mathilde Bourdon
    Pietro Santulli
    Chloé Maignien
    Khaled Pocate-Cheriet
    Louis Marcellin
    Yulian Chen
    Charles Chapron
    [J]. Reproductive Sciences, 2020, 27 : 204 - 210
  • [24] The ovarian response after follicular versus luteal phase stimulation with a double stimulation strategy
    Santulli, P.
    Bourdon, M.
    Chen, Y.
    Gonnot, J.
    Cervantes, C.
    Blanchet, V.
    Maignien, C.
    Pocate-Cheriet, K.
    Marcellin, L.
    Chapron, C.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2018, 33 : 450 - 451
  • [25] Ovarian stimulation in the luteal phase: systematic review and meta-analysis
    C. E. Boots
    M. Meister
    A. R. Cooper
    A. Hardi
    E. S. Jungheim
    [J]. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2016, 33 : 971 - 980
  • [26] Ovarian stimulation in the luteal phase: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Boots, C. E.
    Meister, M.
    Cooper, A. R.
    Hardi, A.
    Jungheim, E. S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2016, 33 (08) : 971 - 980
  • [27] Luteal-phase ovarian stimulation strategy for assisted reproduction treatment
    Wang, N.
    Wang, Y.
    Kuang, Y.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2015, 30 : 427 - 427
  • [28] Should luteal phase support be introduced in ovarian stimulation/IUI programme?
    Eguiluz Gutierrez-Barquin, I.
    Sanchez Sanchez, V.
    Torres Afonso, A.
    Alvarez Sanchez, M.
    De Leon Socorro, S.
    Molina Cabrillana, J.
    Seara Fernandez, S.
    Garcia Hernandez, J. A.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2012, 27
  • [29] Improving the luteal phase after ovarian stimulation: reviewing new options
    Andersen, C. Yding
    Andersen, K. Vilbour
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2014, 28 (05) : 552 - 559
  • [30] Luteal phase support with progesterone does not improve pregnancy rates in patients undergoing ovarian stimulation with letrozole
    Dilday, Elizabeth
    Gigg, Marisa
    Hoyos, Luis
    Quinn, Molly
    Markovic, Daniela
    Kroener, Lindsay
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2023, 46 (01) : 123 - 128