Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Patients With Pharmacoresistant Epileptic Spasms: A Pilot Study

被引:17
|
作者
Yang, Dongju [1 ,2 ]
Du, Qiaoyi [1 ,2 ]
Huang, Zhaoyang [1 ,2 ]
Li, Liping [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Zhang [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Liping [3 ]
Zhao, Xin [1 ,2 ]
Zhao, Xuan [3 ]
Li, Ting [3 ]
Lin, Yicong [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Yuping [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Capital Med Univ, Xuanwu Hosp, Dept Neurol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Key Lab Neuromodulat, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Capital Med Univ, Xuanwu Hosp, Dept Pediat, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Capital Med Univ, Beijing Inst Brain Disorders, Ctr Epilepsy, Beijing, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY | 2019年 / 10卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
tDCS; epileptic spasms; seizures; epilepsy; infantile spasms; EEG; TEMPORAL-LOBE EPILEPSY; INFANTILE SPASMS; MOTOR CORTEX; EXCITABILITY; SEIZURE; CHILDHOOD;
D O I
10.3389/fneur.2019.00050
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Epileptic spasms (ES) is a severe seizure type and lack of adequate methods for controlling of clinical attacks. Previous studies have indicated that cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) reduces seizure frequency for patients with epilepsy. ES are proposed to have a focal cortical origin. We hypothesized that patients with ES exhibit hyperactive network hubs in the parietal lobe, and that cathodal tDCS targeting the bilateral parietal region can reduce seizure frequency in patients with pharmacoresistant ES. Materials and Methods: The present study consisted of three basic phases: (a) a pre-treatment monitoring period for 14 days; (b) a consecutive 14-day treatment period during which patients were treated with 1 or 2 mA cathode tDCS for 40 min once per day; (c) and a follow-up period for at least 28 days. During the first 20 min of treatment, the cathode was placed over the right parietal lobe (P4) with the reference electrode over the contralateral supra-orbital area. In the second 20 min, the cathode was placed over the left parietal lobe (P3), with the reference electrode over the contralateral supra-orbital area. All patients received active tDCS treatment, and some patients underwent more than one treatment block. Patients maintained a seizure diary throughout the study. Antiepileptic drug therapy remained unchanged throughout the study. K-related samples Friedman tests and two-related samples tests were used to analyze data from all patients. Results: Seven patients with pharmacoresistant ES were included, receiving a total of eighteen 14-day blocks of tDCS treatment. We observed a significant difference in seizure frequency at the second month (p= 0.028, unadjusted), as well as a trend toward decreased seizure frequency at the fourth month (p = 0.068, unadjusted) of the first follow-up, relative to baseline. Three of seven patients (42.9%) exhibited sustained seizure reduction, while one (14.3%) experienced a short-term reduction in seizure frequency following cathodal tDCS treatment. Treatment was well tolerated in all patients. Conclusions: Repeated tDCS with the cathode placed over the bilateral parietal region is safe and may be effective for reducing seizure frequency in a subgroup of patients with pharmacoresistant ES.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] An image-guided transcranial direct current stimulation system: a pilot phantom study
    Jung, Young-Jin
    Kim, Jung-Hoon
    Kim, Daejeong
    Im, Chang-Hwan
    PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2013, 34 (08) : 937 - 950
  • [22] Delayed effect of bifrontal transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with treatment-resistant depression: a pilot study
    Min-Shan Li
    Xiang-Dong Du
    Hsiao-Chi Chu
    Yen-Ying Liao
    Wen Pan
    Zhe Li
    Galen Chin-Lun Hung
    BMC Psychiatry, 19
  • [23] Delayed effect of bifrontal transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with treatment-resistant depression: a pilot study
    Li, Min-Shan
    Du, Xiang-Dong
    Chu, Hsiao-Chi
    Liao, Yen-Ying
    Pan, Wen
    Li, Zhe
    Hung, Galen Chin-Lun
    BMC PSYCHIATRY, 2019, 19 (1)
  • [24] A pilot study investigating the effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on the electrophysiological correlates of working memory in patients with schizophrenia
    Moon, Sun-Young
    Kim, Minah
    Hwang, Wu Jeong
    Lee, Tae Young
    Kwon, Jun Soo
    PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH-NEUROIMAGING, 2019, 284 : 9 - 12
  • [25] Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Patients with Anxiety: Current Perspectives
    Stein, Dirson Joao
    Medeiros, Liciane Fernandes
    Caumo, Wolnei
    Torres, Iraci L. S.
    NEUROPSYCHIATRIC DISEASE AND TREATMENT, 2020, 16 : 161 - 169
  • [26] High-Definition transcranial direct current stimulation in early onset epileptic encephalopathy: a case study
    Meiron, Oded
    Gale, Rena
    Namestnic, Julia
    Bennet-Back, Odeya
    David, Jonathan
    Gebodh, Nigel
    Adair, Devin
    Esmaeilpour, Zeinab
    Bikson, Marom
    BRAIN INJURY, 2018, 32 (01) : 135 - 143
  • [27] Transcranial direct current stimulation
    Fregni, F
    Boggio, PS
    Nitsche, PS
    Pascual-Leone, A
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2005, 186 : 446 - 447
  • [28] Transcranial direct current stimulation in acute stroke patients
    Hodics, T. M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2012, 19 (09) : e94 - e94
  • [29] Home-based transcranial direct current stimulation in postpartum depression: the feasibility study and pilot study
    Ganho-Avila, Ana
    Mesquita, Ana
    Cruz, Andrea
    Moura-Ramos, Mariana
    JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE AND INFANT PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 40 (02) : CXL - CXL
  • [30] Home-Based Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Primary Progressive Aphasia: A Pilot Study
    Neophytou, Kyriaki
    Williamson, Kelly
    Herrmann, Olivia
    Afthinos, Alexandros
    Gallegos, Jessica
    Martin, Nadine
    Tippett, Donna C.
    Tsapkini, Kyrana
    BRAIN SCIENCES, 2024, 14 (04)