D2 lymphadenectomy alone or with para-aortic nodal dissection for gastric cancer

被引:829
|
作者
Sasako, Mitsuru [1 ]
Sano, Takeshi [1 ]
Yamamoto, Seiichiro [2 ]
Kurokawa, Yukinori [2 ]
Nashimoto, Atsushi [3 ]
Kurita, Akira [4 ]
Hiratsuka, Masahiro [5 ]
Tsujinaka, Toshimasa [6 ]
Kinoshita, Taira [7 ]
Arai, Kuniyoshi [8 ]
Yamamura, Yoshitaka [9 ]
Okajima, Kunio [10 ]
机构
[1] Natl Canc Ctr, Gastr Surg Div, Tokyo, Japan
[2] Natl Canc Ctr, Japan Clin Oncol Grp Data Ctr, Tokyo 104, Japan
[3] Niigata Canc Ctr Hosp, Dept Surg, Niigata, Japan
[4] Natl Shikoku Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, Matsuyama, Ehime, Japan
[5] Osaka Med Ctr Canc & Cardiovasc Dis, Dept Surg, Osaka, Japan
[6] Osaka Natl Hosp, Dept Surg, Osaka, Japan
[7] Natl Canc Ctr Hosp E, Dept Surg, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
[8] Tokyo Metropolitan Komagome Hosp, Dept Surg, Tokyo, Japan
[9] Aichi Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, Nagoya, Aichi 464, Japan
[10] Osaka Med Coll, Osaka, Japan
来源
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE | 2008年 / 359卷 / 05期
关键词
D O I
10.1056/NEJMoa0707035
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy is the standard treatment for curable gastric cancer in eastern Asia. Whether the addition of para-aortic nodal dissection (PAND) to D2 lymphadenectomy for stage T2, T3, or T4 tumors improves survival is controversial. We conducted a randomized, controlled trial at 24 hospitals in Japan to compare D2 lymphadenectomy alone with D2 lymphadenectomy plus PAND in patients undergoing gastrectomy for curable gastric cancer. Methods: Between July 1995 and April 2001, 523 patients with curable stage T2b, T3, or T4 gastric cancer were randomly assigned during surgery to D2 lymphadenectomy alone (263 patients) or to D2 lymphadenectomy plus PAND (260 patients). We did not permit any adjuvant therapy before the recurrence of cancer. The primary end point was overall survival. Results: The rates of surgery-related complications among patients assigned to D2 lymphadenectomy alone and those assigned to D2 lymphadenectomy plus PAND were 20.9% and 28.1%, respectively (P=0.07). There were no significant differences between the two groups in the frequencies of anastomotic leakage, pancreatic fistula, abdominal abscess, pneumonia, or death from any cause within 30 days after surgery (the rate of death was 0.8% in each group). The median operation time was 63 minutes longer and the median blood loss was 230 ml greater in the group assigned to D2 lymphadenectomy plus PAND. The 5-year overall survival rate was 69.2% for the group assigned to D2 lymphadenectomy alone and 70.3% for the group assigned to D2 lymphadenectomy plus PAND; the hazard ratio for death was 1.03 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77 to 1.37; P=0.85). There were no significant differences in recurrence-free survival between the two groups; the hazard ratio for recurrence was 1.08 (95% CI, 0.83 to 1.42; P=0.56). Conclusions: As compared with D2 lymphadenectomy alone, treatment with D2 lymphadenectomy plus PAND does not improve the survival rate in curable gastric cancer. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00149279.).
引用
收藏
页码:453 / 462
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Significance of para-aortic lymph node dissection in advanced gastric cancer
    Kunisaki, C
    Shimada, H
    Yamaoka, H
    Wakasugi, J
    Takahashi, M
    Akiyama, H
    Nomura, M
    Moriwaki, Y
    HEPATO-GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1999, 46 (28) : 2635 - 2642
  • [32] Outcomes of para-aortic lymphadenectomy in colorectat cancer with isolated para-aortic lymph node metastasis
    Choi, PH
    Kim, HC
    Yoon, YS
    Jung, SH
    Kim, AY
    Yu, CS
    Kim, JC
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2006, 49 (05) : 782 - 783
  • [33] Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy in Para-Aortic Staging of Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer
    Vazquez-Vicente, Daniel
    Fernandez del Bas, Barbara
    Garcia Villayzan, Jose
    Plaza Arranz, Javier
    Chiva, Luis
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 25 (07) : 1142 - 1143
  • [34] Pelvic Lymphadenectomy, and Pelvic and Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy Versus No Lymphadenectomy for Endometrial Cancer
    Helal, Khaled Fathy
    Abohashim, Mohamed Fathy
    Almoregy, Abdelwahab S.
    Baiomy, Taha A.
    Gertallah, Loay M.
    Hemeda, Rehab
    Mandour, Doaa
    Embaby, Ahmed
    Harb, Ola A.
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY, 2019, 35 (06) : 377 - 384
  • [35] Is there an interest in para-aortic lymphadenectomy in operable endometrial cancer?
    Bouquier, J.
    Bricou, A.
    Delpech, Y.
    Tulpin, L.
    Akerman, G.
    Barranger, E.
    BULLETIN DU CANCER, 2010, 97 (02) : 199 - 209
  • [36] Para-aortic lymphadenectomy for primary fallopian tube cancer
    Koo, Yu-Jin
    Kwon, Yong-Soon
    Lim, Kyung-Taek
    Lee, Ki-Heon
    Shim, Jae-Uk
    Mok, Jung-Eun
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2011, 112 (01) : 18 - 20
  • [37] PELVIC AND PARA-AORTIC LYMPHADENECTOMY IN CERVICAL-CANCER
    WINTER, R
    PETRU, E
    HAAS, J
    BAILLIERES CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1988, 2 (04): : 857 - 866
  • [38] Role of complete para-aortic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer
    Fujimoto, Toshio
    Fukuda, Jun
    Tanaka, Toshinobu
    CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 21 (01) : 10 - 14
  • [39] Laparoscopic extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy in cervical cancer
    Raposo, L.
    Aldinhas, P.
    Cruz, E.
    Martires, F.
    Pereira da Silva, D.
    17TH WORLD CONGRESS ON CONTROVERSIES IN OBSTETRICS, GYNECOLOGY & INFERTILITY (COGI), 2013, : 223 - 226
  • [40] Application of lymphangiography in para-aortic lymphadenectomy for ovarian cancer
    Xu Zhen
    Wang Lu
    Wang Wu-Liang
    中华医学杂志英文版, 2021, 134 (01) : 107 - 108