Rater reliability and internal scale and person response validity of the school assessment of motor and process skills

被引:10
|
作者
Atchison, BT
Fisher, AG
Bryze, K
机构
[1] Boulder Community Hosp, Boulder, CO USA
[2] Colorado State Univ, Dept Occupat Therapy, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[3] Rush Univ, Dept Occupat Therapy, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
来源
关键词
evaluation process; occupational therapy; school-based occupational therapy;
D O I
10.5014/ajot.52.10.843
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective. The purpose of this study was to examine the internal scale and person response validity as well as intra-rater reliability of the School Assessment of Motor. and Process Skills (School AMPS). Method. Fifty-four students were assessed with the School AMPS while they performed routine school work tasks in their classrooms. The students' ages ranged from 3 to 7 years (M = 4.0 years, SD =.7). Twenty-two students were identified as "typically developing," and 32 were identified as having a developmental or learning disability Results. The School AMPS Motor and Process scale items and tasks (scale validity), the participants (person response validity), and the rater (intrarater reliability) all demonstrated acceptable goodness-of-fit to the many faceted Rasch model (MnSq < 1.4, z < 2). Conclusion. Results supported the validity and reliability of the School AMPS. With additional research and development, the School AMPS has the potential to became the first functional, unobtrusive, reliable, and valid assessment designed by occupational therapists for use by school-based occupational therapists.
引用
收藏
页码:843 / 850
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Motor assessment scale in Norway: Translation and inter-rater reliability
    Kjendahl, A.
    Jahnsen, R.
    Aamodt, G.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY, 2005, 7 (01) : 7 - 12
  • [2] The validity of adding new tasks to the assessment of motor and process skills
    Bray, K
    Fisher, AG
    Duran, L
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 2001, 55 (04): : 409 - 415
  • [3] Brief assessment of motor function - Reliability and concurrent validity of the Gross Motor Scale
    Cintas, HL
    Siegel, KL
    Furst, GP
    Gerber, LH
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 2003, 82 (01) : 33 - 41
  • [4] Response Process Validity Studies of the Scale Literacy Skills Test
    Trate, Jaclyn M.
    Fisher, Victoria
    Blecking, Anja
    Geissinger, Peter
    Murphy, Kristen L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL EDUCATION, 2019, 96 (07) : 1351 - 1358
  • [5] The Inter-Rater Reliability of Technical Skills Assessment and Retention of Rater Training
    Gawad, Nada
    Fowler, Amanda
    Mimeault, Richard
    Raiche, Isabelle
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL EDUCATION, 2019, 76 (04) : 1088 - 1093
  • [6] Validity of the assessment of motor and process skills with students who are visually impaired
    Sellers, SW
    Fisher, AG
    Duran, LJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VISUAL IMPAIRMENT & BLINDNESS, 2001, 95 (03) : 164 - 167
  • [7] Validity of Using the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills to Determine the Need for Assistance
    Merritt, Brenda K.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 2011, 65 (06): : 643 - 650
  • [8] THE ADAPTATION OF SCHOOL REFUSAL ASSESSMENT SCALE INTO TURKISH: RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY STUDIES
    Secer, Ismail
    [J]. PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF STATISTICS, 2014, 30 (06): : 1197 - 1202
  • [9] DEVELOPMENT OF COLLABORATIVE SKILLS SCALE: RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY
    Chopra, Sakshi
    Kauts, Amit
    [J]. MIER-JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL STUDIES TRENDS AND PRACTICES, 2023, 13 (01): : 81 - 97
  • [10] Perceptual Skills Scale: A Validity and Reliability Study
    Cesur, Elifcan
    Akyol, Aysel Koksal
    [J]. CUKUROVA UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF EDUCATION JOURNAL, 2021, 50 (01): : 458 - 486