Cost-effectiveness of primary HPV screening for cervical cancer in Germany - a decision analysis

被引:28
|
作者
Sroczynski, G.
Schnell-Inderst, P.
Muehlberger, N.
Lang, K. [2 ]
Aidelsburger, P. [2 ]
Wasem, J. [3 ]
Mittendorf, T. [4 ,13 ]
Engel, J. [5 ]
Hillemanns, P. [6 ]
Petry, K. U. [7 ]
Kraemer, A. [8 ]
Siebert, U. [1 ,9 ,10 ,11 ,12 ]
机构
[1] UMIT Univ Hlth Sci Med Informat & Technol, Inst Publ Hlth Med Decis Making & Hlth Technol As, Dept Publ Hlth & Hlth Technol Assessment, A-6060 Hall In Tirol, Austria
[2] CAREM GmbH, D-82054 Sauerlach, Germany
[3] Univ Duisburg Essen, Inst Hlth Serv Res & Management, D-45127 Essen, Germany
[4] Leibniz Univ Hannover, Ctr Hlth Econ, D-30167 Hannover, Germany
[5] Univ Munich, IBE Clin Grosshadern, Munich Canc Ctr, Munich Canc Registry, D-81377 Munich, Germany
[6] Hannover Med Sch, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, D-30625 Hannover, Germany
[7] Teaching Hosp Wolfsburg, Hanover Med Sch, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, D-38440 Wolfsburg, Germany
[8] Univ Bielefeld, Dept Publ Hlth Med, Sch Publ Hlth, D-33615 Bielefeld, Germany
[9] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, Ctr Hlth Decis Sci, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[10] Harvard Univ, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[11] Harvard Univ, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Sch Med, Inst Technol Assessment, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[12] ONCOTYROL Ctr Personalized Canc Med, Div Publ Hlth Decis Modelling Hlth Technol Assess, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
[13] Herescon GmbH Hlth Econ Res & Consulting, D-30167 Hannover, Germany
关键词
Human papillomavirus; Screening; Cervical cancer; Decision analysis; Cost benefit analyses; Cost-effectiveness; HUMAN-PAPILLOMAVIRUS INFECTION; ATYPICAL SQUAMOUS-CELLS; NATURAL-HISTORY; INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; CLINICAL-APPLICATIONS; YOUNG-WOMEN; HEALTH-CARE; MODEL; RISK; LESIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejca.2011.03.006
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objectives: To systematically evaluate the long-term effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of HPV-based primary cervical cancer screening in the German health care context using a decision-analysis approach. Methods: A Markov-model for HPV-infection and cervical cancer was developed for the German health care context, and applied to evaluate various screening strategies that differ by screening interval and test algorithms, including HPV-testing alone or in combination with cytology. German clinical, epidemiological, and economic data, and test accuracy data from international meta-analyses were used. Outcomes predicted included the reduction in cervical cancer cases and deaths, life expectancy and discounted incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER). The analysis was performed from the perspective of the healthcare system adopting a 3% annual discount rate for costs and outcomes. Extensive sensitivity analyses were performed. Results: HPV-based screening is more effective than cytology alone. It results in a 71-97% reduction in cervical cancer cases as compared to 53-93% for cytology alone. The ICER range from 2600 Euro/LYG (cytology, 5-year-interval) to 155,500 Euro/LYG (annual HPV-testing starting at age 30 years, cytology age 20-29 years). Annual cytology alone, the current recommended screening strategy in Germany, is dominated by HPV-strategies. Increasing the age at screening initiation from 20 to 25 years does not result in a relevant loss in effectiveness but results in lower costs. Conclusions: Based on our analyses, HPV-based cervical cancer screening is more effective than cytology alone and could be cost-effective if performed at intervals of two years or longer. In the German context, an optimal screening strategy may be biennial HPV screening starting at age 30 years preceded by biennial cytology for women aged 25-29 years. Longer screening intervals may be considered in low-risk women with good screening adherence and in populations with low HPV-incidence. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1633 / 1646
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] THE COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF CERVICAL-CANCER SCREENING
    MILLER, AB
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1992, 117 (06) : 529 - 530
  • [22] Cost-effectiveness of conventional cytology and HPV DNA testing for cervical cancer screening in Colombia
    Andres-Gamboa, Oscar
    Chicaiza, Liliana
    Garcia-Molina, Mario
    Diaz, Jorge
    Gonzalez, Mauricio
    Murillo, Raul
    Ballesteros, Monica
    Sanchez, Ricardo
    [J]. SALUD PUBLICA DE MEXICO, 2008, 50 (04): : 276 - 285
  • [23] Cost-effectiveness analysis of repeated self-sampling for HPV testing in primary cervical screening: a randomized study
    Riina Aarnio
    Ellinor Östensson
    Matts Olovsson
    Inger Gustavsson
    Ulf Gyllensten
    [J]. BMC Cancer, 20
  • [24] Cost-effectiveness analysis of repeated self-sampling for HPV testing in primary cervical screening: a randomized study
    Aarnio, Riina
    Ostensson, Ellinor
    Olovsson, Matts
    Gustavsson, Inger
    Gyllensten, Ulf
    [J]. BMC CANCER, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [25] The impact of alternate HPV vaccination and cervical screening strategies in Japan: a cost-effectiveness analysis
    Palmer, Matthew R.
    Saito, Eiko
    Katanoda, Kota
    Sakamoto, Haruka
    Hocking, Jane S.
    Brotherton, Julia M. L.
    Ong, Jason J.
    [J]. LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH-WESTERN PACIFIC, 2024, 44
  • [26] Cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening with primary human papillomavirus testing in Norway
    Burger, E. A.
    Ortendahl, J. D.
    Sy, S.
    Kristiansen, I. S.
    Kim, J. J.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2012, 106 (09) : 1571 - 1578
  • [27] Cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening with primary human papillomavirus testing in Norway
    E A Burger
    J D Ortendahl
    S Sy
    I S Kristiansen
    J J Kim
    [J]. British Journal of Cancer, 2012, 106 : 1571 - 1578
  • [28] Optimal Management Strategies for Primary HPV Testing for Cervical Screening: Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation for the National Cervical Screening Program in Australia
    Simms, Kate T.
    Hall, Michaela
    Smith, Megan A.
    Lew, Jie-Bin
    Hughes, Suzanne
    Yuill, Susan
    Hammond, Ian
    Saville, Marion
    Canfell, Karen
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (01):
  • [29] A DISTRIBUTIONAL COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF CERVICAL CANCER SCREENING STRATEGIES IN ENGLAND
    van Hest, N.
    Griffiths, M.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2023, 26 (06) : S68 - S68
  • [30] The cost-effectiveness of cervical screening
    Smith, WJ
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 1999, 11 (01) : 83 - 85