Enhanced multi-objective optimization of a dimpled channel through evolutionary algorithms and multiple surrogate methods

被引:18
|
作者
Husain, Afzal [1 ]
Lee, Ki-Don [1 ]
Kim, Kwang-Yong [1 ]
机构
[1] Inha Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Inchon 402751, South Korea
关键词
dimpled channel; turbine-blade cooling; multi-objective optimization; surrogate fidelity analysis; enhanced Pareto-optimal front; HEAT-TRANSFER; NUMERICAL PREDICTIONS; SHAPE OPTIMIZATION; FLOW STRUCTURE; SURFACES; FRICTION; NUMBER; DEPTH; WALL;
D O I
10.1002/fld.2282
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Using a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm (MOEA) and enhanced surrogate approximations, the present study demonstrates the numerical analysis and optimization of staggered-dimple channels. Two surrogates, the response surface approximation (RSA) model and the Kriging (KRG) model, are applied in light of the surrogate fidelity of the approximate analysis. An enhanced Pareto-optimal front is obtained by performing local resampling of the Pareto-optimal front, which provides relatively more accurate Pareto-optimal solutions in the design space for each surrogate model. Three dimensionless design variables are selected, which are related to geometric parameters, namely, the channel height, dimple print diameter, dimple spacing, and dimple depth. Two objective functions are selected that are related to the heat transfer and pressure loss, respectively. The objective-function values are numerically evaluated through Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes analysis at the design points that are selected through the Latin hypercube sampling method. Using these numerical simulations two surrogates, viz, the RSA and Kriging models, are constructed for each objective function and a hybrid MOEA is applied to obtain the Pareto-optimal front. For the particular implementation of surrogate models, it is observed that Pareto-optimal predictions of the RSA model are better than those of the KRG model, whereas the KRG model predicts equally well at the off-Pareto-region (region away from the Pareto-optimal solutions), which is not the case with the RSA model. The local resampling of the Pareto-optimal front increases the fidelity of the approximate solutions near the Pareto-optimal region. The ratios of the channel height to the dimple print diameter and of the dimple print diameter to the dimple pitch are found to be more sensitive along the Pareto-optimal front than the ratio of the dimple depth to the print diameter. The decrease of the ratio of the channel height to the dimple diameter and the increase of the ratio of the dimple print diameter to the pitch lead to greater heat transfer at the expense of the pressure loss, whereas the ratio of the dimple depth to the print diameter is rather insensitive to Pareto-optimal solutions. Pareto-optimal solutions at higher values of the Nusselt number are associated with higher values of the pressure loss due to the increased recirculation, mixing of fluid and vorticity generation. Copyright (C) 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:742 / 759
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A Hybrid Multi-objective Evolutionary Algorithm Based on a Surrogate Optimization Model
    Huang, Jing
    Li, Hecheng
    [J]. BASIC & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & TOXICOLOGY, 2020, 127 : 105 - 105
  • [32] A Hybrid Surrogate-Based Approach for Evolutionary Multi-Objective Optimization
    Rosales-Perez, Alejandro
    Coello Coello, Carlos A.
    Gonzalez, Jesus A.
    Reyes-Garcia, Carlos A.
    Jair Escalante, Hugo
    [J]. 2013 IEEE CONGRESS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION (CEC), 2013, : 2548 - 2555
  • [33] Evolutionary algorithms for multi-objective optimization: Performance assessments and comparisons
    Tan, KC
    Lee, TH
    Khor, EF
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE REVIEW, 2002, 17 (04) : 253 - 290
  • [34] Research in the performance assessment of multi-objective optimization evolutionary algorithms
    Deng, Guoqiang
    Huang, Zhangcan
    Tang, Min
    [J]. 2007 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMMUNICATIONS, CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS PROCEEDINGS, VOLS 1 AND 2: VOL 1: COMMUNICATION THEORY AND SYSTEMS; VOL 2: SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE, CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS, 2007, : 915 - +
  • [35] Archivers for Single- and Multi-objective Evolutionary Optimization Algorithms
    Hernandez, Carlos
    Schutze, Oliver
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2022 GENETIC AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION CONFERENCE COMPANION, GECCO 2022, 2022, : 37 - 38
  • [36] Solving Constrained Multi-objective Optimization Problems with Evolutionary Algorithms
    Snyman, Frikkie
    Helbig, Marde
    [J]. ADVANCES IN SWARM INTELLIGENCE, ICSI 2017, PT II, 2017, 10386 : 57 - 66
  • [37] Multi-objective optimization in evolutionary algorithms using satisfiability classes
    Drechsler, N
    Drechsler, R
    Becker, B
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE: THEORY AND APPLICATIONS, 1999, 1625 : 108 - 117
  • [38] Automatic Design of Evolutionary Algorithms for Multi-Objective Combinatorial Optimization
    Bezerra, Leonardo C. T.
    Lopez-Ibanez, Manuel
    Stuetzle, Thomas
    [J]. PARALLEL PROBLEM SOLVING FROM NATURE - PPSN XIII, 2014, 8672 : 508 - 517
  • [39] Automatic design of evolutionary algorithms for multi-objective combinatorial optimization
    20174004240294
    [J]. (1) IRIDIA, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium, 1600, (Springer Verlag):
  • [40] A Systematic Review of Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms Optimization Frameworks
    Patrausanu, Andrei
    Florea, Adrian
    Neghina, Mihai
    Dicoiu, Alina
    Chis, Radu
    [J]. PROCESSES, 2024, 12 (05)