Influence of Prior Intense Exercise and Cold Water Immersion in Recovery for Performance and Physiological Response during Subsequent Exercise

Athletes in intense endurance sports (e.g., 4000-m track cycling) often perform maximally (similar to 4 min) twice a day due to qualifying and finals being placed on the same day. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate repeated performance on the same day in a competitive setting (part A) and the influence from prior intense exercise on subsequent performance and physiological response to moderate and maximal exercise with and without the use of cold water immersion (CWI) in recovery (part B). In part A, performance times during eight World championships for male track cyclists were extracted from the qualifying and final races in 4000-m individual pursuit. In part B, twelve trained cyclists with an average (+/- SD) (V) over dotO(2)-peak of 67 +/- 5 mL/min/kg performed a protocol mimicking a qualifying race (QUAL) followed 3 h later by a performance test (PT) with each exercise period encompassing intense exercise for 4 min preceded by an identical warm-up period in both a control setting (CON) and using cold water immersion in recovery (CWI; 15 min at 15 degrees C). Performance was lowered (P < 0.001) from qualification to finals (259 +/- 3 vs. 261 +/- 3s) for the track cyclists during World championships in part A. In part B, mean power in PT was not different in CWI relative to CON (406 +/- 43 vs. 405 +/- 38 W). Peak (V) over dotO(2) (5.04 +/- 0.50 vs. 5.00 +/- 0.49 L/min) and blood lactate (13 +/- 3 vs. 14 +/- 3 mmol/L) did not differ between QUAL and PT and cycling economy and potassium handling was not impaired by prior intense exercise. In conclusion, performance is reduced with repeated maximal exercise in world-class track cyclists during 4000-m individual pursuit lasting similar to 4 min, however prior intense exercise do not appear to impair peak (V) over dotO(2), peak lactate, cycling economy, or potassium handling in trained cyclists and CWI in recovery does not improve subsequent performance.