Histomorphometric Results o a Randomized Controlled Clinics Trial Studying Maxillary Sinus Augmentation with Two Different Biomaterials s and Simultaneous Implant Placement

被引:8
|
作者
Chiu, Tzu-Shan [1 ]
Lee, Chun-Teh [2 ]
Bittner, Nurit [3 ]
Prasad, Hari [4 ]
Tarnow, Dennis P. [5 ]
Schulze-Spaete, Ulrike [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Coll Dent Med, New York, NY USA
[2] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr Houston, Dept Periodont & Dent Hyg, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Columbia Univ, Coll Dent Med, Div Prosthodont, New York, NY USA
[4] Univ Minnesota, Sch Dent, Dept Diagnost & Biol Sci, Hard Tissues Res Lab, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[5] Columbia Univ, Coll Dent Med, Dept Periodont, Implant Dent, New York, NY USA
[6] Friedrich Schiller Univ, Univ Hosp Jena, Ctr Dent Med, Dept Conservat Dent & Periodontol,Sect Geriodont, Alten Post 4, D-07743 Jena, Germany
[7] Columbia Univ, Coll Dent Med, Div Periodont, Dent Med, New York, NY USA
关键词
allografts; dental implants; sinus floor augmentation; treatment outcome; xenografts; ANORGANIC BOVINE BONE; TRANSMISSION ELECTRON-MICROSCOPY; CALCIUM-PHOSPHATE BCP; BIO-OSS; FLOOR AUGMENTATION; AUTOGENOUS BONE; DENTAL IMPLANTS; LONG-TERM; SYNTHETIC HYDROXYAPATITE; ELEVATION;
D O I
10.11607/jomi.6778
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: Maxillary sinus augmentation has been a predictable procedure. However, in-depth analysis of tissue healing after sinus grafting with simultaneous implant placement is limited. This study aimed to compare histologic outcomes after sinus grafting with a synthetic bone graft compared with a xenograft. Materials and Methods: A randomized controlled split-mouth study was conducted to compare bone formation around microimplants (2.00 mm, Dentium) placed at the time of maxillary sinus augmentation with a synthetic material (Osteon, Dentium) (OST) and deproteinized bovine bone (Bio-Oss) (BIO) as the control group. Four microimplants per subject (n = 13) were placed bilaterally for intrasubject comparison (two implants per side/patient). Bone cores with osseointegrated microimplants were harvested for histomorphometric analysis 6 to 8 months after sinus augmentation surgery. Results: Histologic analysis revealed newly formed bone deposited on the microimplant surface and bridging to bone graft material in both groups. Further, there was no histologic evidence of signs of inflammation in all specimens. In general, bone-to-implant contact was comparable and ranged from 6.1% to 67.0% with a mean of 38.4% +/- 11.61% in OST and from 10.5% to 57.0% with a mean of 34.58% +/- 12.55% in BIO. However, a significantly higher percentage of bone-to-implant contact in the first four threads of the grafted area was noted in OST compared with BIO (P = .016). Conclusion: The synthetic OST was found to be equivalent to BlO in new bone formation and clinical success after sinus augmentation in conjunction with microimplant placement. Although there are some statistically significant differences in the histologic outcomes, the clinical relevance of these needs to be further evaluated. Nevertheless, the findings of this study indicate that this synthetic alloplast would be a viable alternative to an allograft material.
引用
收藏
页码:1320 / 1330
页数:11
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Simultaneous Sinus Augmentation with Implant Placement: Histomorphometric Comparison of Two Different Grafting Materials. A Multicenter Double-Blind Prospective Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
    Silvestri, Maurizio
    Martegani, Paolo
    D'Avenia, Ferdinando
    Farneti, Mauro
    Capri, Diego
    Paolantoni, Guerino
    Landi, Luca
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2013, 28 (02) : 543 - 549
  • [2] Maxillary sinus augmentation with three different biomaterials: Histological, histomorphometric, clinical, and patient-reported outcomes from a randomized controlled trial
    Velasco-Ortega, Eugenio
    Valente, Nicola Alberto
    Iezzi, Giovanna
    Petrini, Morena
    Derchi, Giacomo
    Barone, Antonio
    [J]. CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2021, 23 (01) : 86 - 95
  • [3] A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Implants Placed in Two Different Biomaterials Used for Maxillary Sinus Augmentation
    Correia, Francisco
    Gouveia, Sonia Alexandre
    Pozza, Daniel Humberto
    Felino, Antonio Campos
    Faria-Almeida, Ricardo
    [J]. MATERIALS, 2023, 16 (03)
  • [4] Histomorphometric Evaluation of Two Different Bone Substitutes in Sinus Augmentation Procedures: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Humans
    Rodriguez y Baena, Ruggero
    Pastorino, Roberta
    Gherlone, Enrico Felice
    Perillo, Letizia
    Lupi, Saturnino Marco
    Lucchese, Alessandra
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2017, 32 (01) : 188 - 194
  • [5] Research Article A Comparative Histomorphometric Analysis of Two Biomaterials for Maxillary Sinus Augmentation: A Randomized Clinical, Crossover, and Split-Mouth Study
    Martiniano, Carlos Ricardo de Queiroz
    Valadas, Lidia Audrey Rocha
    do Carmo Filho, Jose Ronildo Lins
    Alves, Ana Paula Negreiros Nunes
    Lotif, Mara Assef Leitao
    Sotto-Maior, Bruno Salles
    Dantas, Thereza Cristina Farias Botelho
    Rodrigues, Luciane Lacerda Franco Rocha
    Francischone, Carlos Eduardo
    [J]. EVIDENCE-BASED COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE, 2022, 2022
  • [6] A histomorphometric assessment of collagen-stabilized anorganic bovine bone mineral in maxillary sinus augmentation a randomized controlled trial in sheep
    Alayan, Jamil
    Vaquette, Cedryck
    Saifzadeh, Siamak
    Hutmacher, Dietmar
    Ivanovski, Saso
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2016, 27 (06) : 734 - 743
  • [7] Histomorphometric evaluation of different graft associations for maxillary sinus elevation in wide antral cavities: a randomized controlled clinical trial
    Harlos, Mauricio Marcelo
    da Silva, Thiago Bezerra
    Montagner, Pedro Giorgetti
    Teixeira, Lucas Novaes
    Gomes, Adriana Vanderley
    Martinez, Elizabeth Ferreira
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2022, 26 (08) : 5481 - 5489
  • [8] Histomorphometric evaluation of different graft associations for maxillary sinus elevation in wide antral cavities: a randomized controlled clinical trial
    Mauricio Marcelo Harlos
    Thiago Bezerra da Silva
    Pedro Giorgetti Montagner
    Lucas Novaes Teixeira
    Adriana Vanderley Gomes
    Elizabeth Ferreira Martinez
    [J]. Clinical Oral Investigations, 2022, 26 : 1 - 9
  • [9] The assessment of the effect of the size of lateral-antrostomy in graftless balloon elevation of the maxillary sinus membrane with simultaneous implant placement (a randomized controlled clinical trial)
    Aldahouk, Ahmed
    Elbeialy, Ramy R.
    Gibaly, Amr
    Shawky, Mohamed
    Atef, Mohammed
    [J]. CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2021, 23 (01) : 31 - 42
  • [10] Comparative Histological and Histomorphometric Results of Six Biomaterials Used in Two-Stage Maxillary Sinus Augmentation Model after 6-Month Healing
    La Monaca, Gerardo
    Iezzi, Giovanna
    Cristalli, Maria Paola
    Pranno, Nicola
    Sfasciotti, Gian Luca
    Vozza, Iole
    [J]. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 2018