Simultaneous Sinus Augmentation with Implant Placement: Histomorphometric Comparison of Two Different Grafting Materials. A Multicenter Double-Blind Prospective Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

被引:13
|
作者
Silvestri, Maurizio [1 ]
Martegani, Paolo [1 ]
D'Avenia, Ferdinando [1 ]
Farneti, Mauro [1 ]
Capri, Diego [1 ]
Paolantoni, Guerino [1 ]
Landi, Luca [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Parma, I-43100 Parma, Italy
关键词
bovine bone substitute; porcine bone particles; posterior maxilla; simultaneous implant position; sinus elevation; ANORGANIC BOVINE BONE; BIOACTIVE GLASS MATERIAL; MAXILLARY SINUS; FLOOR ELEVATION; BIO-OSS; HISTOLOGICAL OBSERVATIONS; OSSEOUS RESPONSE; AUTOGENOUS BONE; DENTAL IMPLANTS; HUMANS;
D O I
10.11607/jomi.2647
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: Sinus elevation via the lateral approach for implant rehabilitation of atrophic posterior maxillae is considered a safe and predictable therapy. Several xenogeneic biomaterials of different biologic origin have been used as valid and predictable alternatives to autogenous bone. This multicenter randomized controlled double-blind prospective clinical trial aimed to compare histomorphometrically two xenogeneic grafting materials used for sinus elevation with simultaneous implant placement. Materials and Methods: Seven private practices in Italy were involved. Patients presenting at least one site with a residual bone crest height between 2 and 4 mm were treated. Control sites were grafted with 100% deproteinated particulated bovine bone (DPBB), while test sites were grafted with prehydrated corticocancellous porcine bone (PCPB). Root-form implants were placed simultaneously. Insertion torque and clinical stability were assessed and recorded. At 6 months, a biopsy specimen was harvested from each site, and histomorphometric analyses were performed. Results: Thirty-seven patients received 42 sinus elevations (24 test and 18 control). Eighty-two implants with adequate primary stability were placed. Fifty-five implants were placed in residual bone crests greater than 2 mm but less than 4 mm (average 2.7 mm) and achieved an average insertion torque of 22.8 +/- 11.3 N/cm. Nineteen implants were placed in ridges greater than 3 mm but less than 5 mm, and eight were placed in ridges with more than 5 mm remaining. After 6 months, three implants had failed to integrate, leading to a survival rate of 96.34%. Forty-two specimens were analyzed histomorphometrically. No significant differences in total bone volume (PCPB 37.43%, DPBB 37.52%) or residual grafting material (PCPB 13.55%, DPBB 16.44%) were detected. Conclusions: In this study, PCPB compared well with DPBB as a grafting material for lateral sinus elevation.
引用
收藏
页码:543 / 549
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Histomorphometric Results o a Randomized Controlled Clinics Trial Studying Maxillary Sinus Augmentation with Two Different Biomaterials s and Simultaneous Implant Placement
    Chiu, Tzu-Shan
    Lee, Chun-Teh
    Bittner, Nurit
    Prasad, Hari
    Tarnow, Dennis P.
    Schulze-Spaete, Ulrike
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2018, 33 (06) : 1320 - 1330
  • [2] Histological and Histomorphometric Evaluation of New Bone Formation after Maxillary Sinus Augmentation with Two Different Osteoconductive Materials: A Randomized, Parallel, Double-Blind Clinical Trial
    Grasso, Giuseppe
    Mummolo, Stefano
    Bernardi, Sara
    Pietropaoli, Davide
    D'Ambrosio, Giuseppe
    Iezzi, Giovanna
    Piattelli, Adriano
    Bianchi, Serena
    Marchetti, Enrico
    MATERIALS, 2020, 13 (23) : 1 - 12
  • [3] Conservative vs Surgical Interventions for Umbilical Pilonidal Sinus: A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial
    Kaplan, Mehmet
    Ozcan, Onder
    Kaplan, Fatma Cigdem
    Yalcin, Huseyin Cahit
    Salman, Bulent
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2016, 222 (05) : 878 - 889
  • [4] Histomorphometric Evaluation of Two Different Bone Substitutes in Sinus Augmentation Procedures: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Humans
    Rodriguez y Baena, Ruggero
    Pastorino, Roberta
    Gherlone, Enrico Felice
    Perillo, Letizia
    Lupi, Saturnino Marco
    Lucchese, Alessandra
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2017, 32 (01) : 188 - 194
  • [5] A Multicenter Randomized Double-blind Controlled Clinical Trial of Fiber Post Cementation Strategies
    Bergoli, C. D.
    Brondani, L. P.
    Wandscher, V. F.
    Pereira, G. K. R.
    Cenci, M. S.
    Pereira-Cenci, T.
    Valandro, L. F.
    OPERATIVE DENTISTRY, 2018, 43 (02) : 128 - 135
  • [6] Comparison Between Esketamine and Alfentanil for Hysteroscopy: A Prospective, Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
    Weng, Mengcao
    Wang, Dongdong
    Zhong, Jia
    Qian, Minyue
    Zhang, Kai
    Jin, Yue
    DRUG DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND THERAPY, 2024, 18 : 3629 - 3641
  • [7] A prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial of enteral immunonutrition in the critically ill
    Atkinson, S
    Sieffert, E
    Bihari, D
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1998, 26 (07) : 1164 - 1172
  • [8] A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial of Continuous Local Anesthetic Infusion in Cosmetic Breast Augmentation
    Parsa, F. Don
    Parsa, Alan A.
    Sprouse-Blum, Adam S.
    Jackowe, David J.
    Semenza, Michael
    Pang, John
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2008, 122 (06) : 1978 - 1979
  • [9] A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial of Continuous Local Anesthetic Infusion in Cosmetic Breast Augmentation
    Danilla, Stefan
    Cavada, Gabriel
    Marre, Diego
    Norambuena, Hernan
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2008, 122 (04) : 1288 - 1290
  • [10] A prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial of continuous local anesthetic infusion in cosmetic breast augmentation
    Kazmier, Faeza R.
    Henry, Steven L.
    Christiansen, Dustin
    Puckett, Charles L.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2008, 121 (03) : 711 - 715