Coronavirus and government response conundrum in Africa: How effective are the stringency measures?

被引:0
|
作者
Ibrahim, Muazu [1 ]
Mukungu, Allan [2 ]
机构
[1] African Dev Bank AIDB, Making Finance Work Africa MFW4A Secretariat, Abidjan, Cote Ivoire
[2] United Nations Econ Commiss Africa UNECA, Sect Macroecon & Governance Div MGD, Econ Governance & Publ Finance EGPF, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
来源
关键词
COVID-19; stringency index; confirmed cases; deaths; Africa; PANEL-DATA;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Reducing the spread of infections and deaths attributed to the coronavirus (COVID-19) are a major concern of countries, particularly in Africa. This concern has led governments to institute several restrictive measures aimed at containing the COVID-19 crisis. Notwithstanding the restrictions, the number of cases and COVID-19 deaths continue to increase, raising questions regarding the effectiveness of the restrictions. In addition to determining the impact of the restrictions on COVID-19 deaths, this study examines how the restrictions influence the COVID-19 mortalities through its impact on the confirmed cases. By relying on daily data from 49 African countries, the study finds that higher restrictions measured by stringency index are associated with lower deaths. While the number of confirmed cases increase deaths, higher stringency index dampens the mortality-increasing effect of the confirmed cases. However, possible nonlinearities exist which suggest that the magnitude of reduced deaths is not the same for all countries. The study observes that while higher stringency index generally lowers death cases, its negative effect is huge for countries with stringency index above the threshold. Balancing the desire for economies to build-back better against the proliferation of COVID-19 are two conundrums African governments face.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 55
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] New Measures for the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Response: A Lesson From the Wenzhou Experience
    Ruan, Linhui
    Wen, Min
    Zeng, Qingrun
    Chen, Chengshui
    Huang, Shengwei
    Yang, Su
    Yang, Jianjing
    Wang, Jingqiang
    Hu, Yuhuan
    Ding, Saidan
    Zhang, Ying
    Zhang, Hongxia
    Feng, Yuanjing
    Jin, Kunlin
    Zhuge, Qichuan
    [J]. CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2020, 71 (15) : 866 - 869
  • [42] Small firms exporting: How effective are government export assistance programs?
    Moini, AH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SMALL BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, 1998, 36 (01) : 1 - 15
  • [44] COVID-19 government response measures: analysis in the European Union
    Pinheiro, Vera
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 31 : 307 - 307
  • [45] Keeping tobacco cheap: how tobacco companies undermine government tax measures
    Malone, Ruth E.
    [J]. TOBACCO CONTROL, 2018, 27 (05) : 483 - 483
  • [46] How the State is Handling the Property Crisis in France: A Perspective on Recent Government Measures
    Pollard, Julie
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF URBAN AND REGIONAL RESEARCH, 2010, 34 (03) : 686 - 692
  • [47] HOW A MEMBER OF CONGRESS MEASURES THE RESPONSE OF HIS CONSTITUENTS
    Vorys, John M.
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF SPEECH, 1946, 32 (02) : 170 - 172
  • [48] THE UK GOVERNMENT'S LEGAL OPINION ON FORCIBLE MEASURES IN RESPONSE TO THE USE OF CHEMICAL WEAPONS BY THE SYRIAN GOVERNMENT
    Henderson, Christian
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL & COMPARATIVE LAW QUARTERLY, 2015, 64 (01) : 179 - 196
  • [49] The UK government tested the response to a coronavirus-why are we only discovering this now?
    McKee, Martin
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 375
  • [50] The politics of HIV/AIDS in South Africa: government action and public response
    Lodge, Tom
    [J]. THIRD WORLD QUARTERLY, 2015, 36 (08) : 1570 - 1591