Phonological similarity in free and serial recall: The effect of increasing retention intervals

被引:14
|
作者
Fournet, N
Juphard, A
Monnier, C
Roulin, JL
机构
[1] Univ Savoie, Dept Psychol, LPNC, CNRS,UMR 5105, F-73011 Chambery, France
[2] Univ Montpellier 3, F-34032 Montpellier, France
关键词
D O I
10.1080/00207590344000204
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The phonological similarity effect (or acoustic confusion effect) consists of poor serial recall performance for lists composed of similar-sounding words compared to lists of dissimilar-sounding items. Building on the work of Nairne and Kelley (1999), the extent to which this classical verbal short-term memory effect changes over the course of a retention interval was investigated. The impact of the phonological similarity on memory performance over time was compared in three paradigms: order reconstruction, serial recall, and free recall. Participants were presented with two blocks of 15 lists composed of five monosyllabic words, one block containing phonologically similar words and the other phonologically distinct words. Recall occurred either after 2, 8, or 24 seconds retention interval filled with a digit shadowing task. Our results confirmed and extended those of Nairne and Kelley. In order reconstruction and serial recall tasks, a classical phonological similarity effect (i.e., decrement in performance with similar lists) was observed for the 2-s retention interval. This effect disappeared after a brief period of digit shadowing (i.e., 8-s delay) and a beneficial effect of similarity was observed for the 24-s retention interval. In the free recall task, the phonological similarity produced better performance whatever the delay between presentation and recall. Those results are discussed in the light of Nairne's (1990a) feature model and confirm the role of item-specific and inter-item processes in order reconstruction, serial recall, and free recall.
引用
收藏
页码:384 / 389
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] RATS can interfere with CATS: Proactive interference and phonological similarity in immediate serial recall
    Tehan, G
    Turcotte, J
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 55 : 216 - 216
  • [22] The phonological similarity effect in immediate recall: Positions of shared phonemes
    Li, XJ
    Schweickert, R
    Gandour, J
    MEMORY & COGNITION, 2000, 28 (07) : 1116 - 1125
  • [23] The phonological similarity effect in immediate recall: Positions of shared phonemes
    Xiaojian Li
    Richard Schweickert
    Jack Gandour
    Memory & Cognition, 2000, 28 : 1116 - 1125
  • [24] Phonological similarity and trace degradation in the serial recall task: When CAT helps RAT, but not MAN
    Fallon, AB
    Groves, K
    Tehan, G
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1999, 34 (5-6) : 301 - 307
  • [25] Opposing effects of phonological similarity on item and order memory of words and nonwords in the serial recall task
    Lian, A
    Karlsen, PJ
    Eriksen, TB
    MEMORY, 2004, 12 (03) : 314 - 337
  • [26] Dissociable lexical and phonological influences on serial recognition and serial recall
    Gathercole, SE
    Pickering, SJ
    Hall, M
    Peaker, SM
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY SECTION A-HUMAN EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 54 (01): : 1 - 30
  • [27] Category knowledge and phonological contributions to serial recall
    Fallon, AB
    Yau, GKT
    Tehan, G
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 54 : 24 - 24
  • [28] SERIAL POSITION EFFECT OF FREE-RECALL
    MURDOCK, BB
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1962, 64 (05): : 482 - &
  • [29] Phonological and semantic strategies in immediate serial recall
    Campoy, Guillermo
    Baddeley, Alan
    MEMORY, 2008, 16 (04) : 329 - 340
  • [30] Semantic similarity and immediate serial recall: Is there an effect on all trials
    Jean Saint-Aubin
    Denis Ouellette
    Marie Poirier
    Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2005, 12 : 171 - 177