Development and validation of an instrument to measure online assessment acceptance in higher education

被引:3
|
作者
Or, Caleb [1 ]
Chapman, Elaine [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Australia, Grad Sch Educ, Perth, WA, Australia
关键词
online assessment; technology acceptance; Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology; COMPUTER-BASED ASSESSMENT; INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY; UTAUT MODEL; STUDENTS ACCEPTANCE; TEACHERS BELIEFS; USER ACCEPTANCE; UNIFIED THEORY; FIT INDEXES; PERCEPTIONS; INTEGRATION;
D O I
10.1111/bjet.13180
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Many educational institutions have adopted online assessment in recent years. Previous studies on online assessment have often been tied to studies on learning management systems. As such, questions of online assessment acceptance have typically been overshadowed by a focus on the acceptance of learning management systems in general. The focus of the present research on online assessment is relatively rare. This paper describes the validation of an instrument to measure online assessment adoption by lecturers in higher education. A total of 213 participants responded to a 20-item online questionnaire. With the data collected and the model fit, the instrument developed was able to meet the expectations to measure online assessment. The preliminary evidence of the validity of the extended Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology model, based on its reliability found in the current study, supports the use of the instrument as a technology acceptance framework for online assessment systems.
引用
收藏
页码:977 / 997
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Development and validation of a measure of authentic online work
    Darling-Aduana, Jennifer
    [J]. ETR&D-EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2021, 69 (03): : 1729 - 1752
  • [32] Metacognitive Planning: Development and Validation of an Online Measure
    Li, Jian
    Zhang, Bo
    Du, Han
    Zhu, Ze
    Li, Yi Ming
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2015, 27 (01) : 260 - 271
  • [33] Development and validation of a measure of online deception and intimacy
    Stanton, Kasey
    Ellickson-Larew, Stephanie
    Watson, David
    [J]. PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2016, 88 : 187 - 196
  • [34] Pros and cons of online education as a measure to reduce carbon emissions in higher education in the NetherlandsPros and cons of online education as a measure to reduce carbon emissions in higher education in the Netherlands
    Versteijlen, Marieke
    Salgado, Francisca Perez
    Groesbeek, Marleen Janssen
    Counotte, Anda
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 28 : 80 - 89
  • [35] Development and validation of a measure of authentic online work
    Jennifer Darling-Aduana
    [J]. Educational Technology Research and Development, 2021, 69 : 1729 - 1752
  • [36] Acceptance of Online Testing As An Alternative Evaluation Tool in Higher Education
    Amalia, Faizatul
    Herlambang, Admaja Dwi
    [J]. 2017 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED COMPUTER SCIENCE AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS (ICACSIS), 2017, : 127 - 130
  • [37] Blended Learning Acceptance Scale (BLAS) in Distance Higher Education: Toward an Initial Development and Validation
    Bervell, Brandford
    Umar, Irfan Naufal
    Kumar, Jeya Amantha
    Asante Somuah, Beatrice
    Arkorful, Valentina
    [J]. SAGE OPEN, 2021, 11 (03):
  • [38] DESIGN AND VALIDATION OF AN INSTRUMENT TO MEASURE THE QUALITY OF WORKING LIFE IN WORKERS OF HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS IN SOUTHERN SONORA, MEXICO
    Quiroz Campas, Celia Yaneth
    Molina Barreras, Itzayana Guadalupe
    Espinoza Morales, Francisco
    Garcia Lirios, Cruz
    Murillo Felix, Cecilia Aurora
    Acosta Mellado, Erika Ivett
    [J]. INTERCIENCIA, 2021, 46 (11) : 423 - 430
  • [39] Lean thinking for education: development and validation of an instrument
    Sfakianaki, Eleni
    Kakouris, Andreas
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITY & RELIABILITY MANAGEMENT, 2019, 36 (06) : 917 - 950
  • [40] Measuring Online Communication Attitude: Instrument Development and Validation
    Ledbetter, Andrew M.
    [J]. COMMUNICATION MONOGRAPHS, 2009, 76 (04) : 463 - 486