Evaluation of an online training for improving self-reported evidence-based decision-making skills in cancer control among public health professionals

被引:6
|
作者
Morshed, A. B. [1 ]
Ballew, P. [1 ]
Elliott, M. B. [2 ]
Haire-Joshu, D. [3 ]
Kreuter, M. W. [3 ]
Brownson, R. C. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ St Louis, Brown Sch, Prevent Res Ctr St Louis, St Louis, MO USA
[2] St Louis Univ, Dept Biostat, Coll Publ Hlth & Social Justice, St Louis, MO 63103 USA
[3] Washington Univ, Brown Sch, Campus Box 1196,1 Brookings Dr, St Louis, MO 63130 USA
[4] Washington Univ St Louis, Div Publ Hlth Sci, Sch Med, St Louis, MO USA
[5] Washington Univ St Louis, Alvin J Siteman Canc Ctr, St Louis, MO USA
关键词
Cancer control; Evidence-based public health; Public health workforce; Online training; PRACTITIONERS; COMPETENCES; WORKFORCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.puhe.2017.06.014
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objectives: The purpose of this evaluation was to assess the effect of the online evidence-based cancer control (EBCC) training on improving the self-reported evidence-based decision-making (EBDM) skills in cancer control among Nebraska public health professionals. Study design: Cross-sectional group comparison. Methods: Previously developed EBDM measures were administered via online surveys to 201 public health professionals at baseline (comparison group) and 123 professionals who took part in the training. Respondents rated the importance of and their skill level in 18 EBCC skills. Differences were examined using analysis of variance models adjusted for gender, age, years at agency, and years in position, and stratified by respondent educational attainment. Results: Among professionals without an advanced degree, training participants reported higher overall skill scores (P=.016) than the baseline non-participant group, primarily driven by differences in the partnerships and collaboration and evaluation domains. No differences in importance ratings were observed. Among professionals with advanced degrees, there were no differences in skill scores and small differences in importance scores in the expected direction (P<.05). Respondents at baseline rated the following facilitators for EBDM as important: expectations from agency leaders and community partners, high priority placed on EBDM by leadership, trainings, and positive feedback. They also reported using a variety of materials for making decisions about programs and policies, though few used individual scientific studies. Conclusions: EBCC led to improved self-reported EBDM skills among public health professionals without an advanced degree, though a gap remained between the self-reported skills and the perceived importance of the skills. Further research on training content and modalities for professionals with higher educational attainment and baseline skill scores is needed. (C) 2017 The Royal Society for Public Health. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:28 / 35
页数:8
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [22] Fostering evidence-based decision-making in Canada - Examining the Need for a Canadian Population and Public Health Evidence Centre and Research Network
    Kiefer, L
    Frank, J
    Di Ruggiero, E
    Dobbins, M
    Manuel, D
    Gully, PR
    Mowat, D
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH-REVUE CANADIENNE DE SANTE PUBLIQUE, 2005, 96 (03): : I1 - I19
  • [23] Knowledge to Practice in Developmental Coordination Disorder: Impact of an Evidence-Based Online Module on Physical Therapists' Self-Reported Knowledge, Skills, and Practice
    Camden, Chantal
    Rivard, Lisa
    Pollock, Nancy
    Missiuna, Cheryl
    PHYSICAL & OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY IN PEDIATRICS, 2015, 35 (02) : 195 - 210
  • [24] Self-reported attitudes, knowledge and skills of using evidence-based medicine in daily health care practice: A national survey among students of medicine and health sciences in Hungary
    Cserto, Monika
    Berenyi, Karoly
    Decsi, Tamas
    Lohner, Szimonetta
    PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (12):
  • [25] Does improving the skills of researchers and decision-makers in health policy and systems research lead to enhanced evidence-based decision making in Nigeria?-A short term evaluation
    Onwujekwe, Obinna
    Etiaba, Enyi
    Mbachu, Chinyere
    Arize, Ifeyinwa
    Nwankwor, Chikezie
    Ezenwaka, Uchenna
    Okeke, Chinyere
    Ezumah, Nkoli
    Uzochukwu, Benjamin
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (09):
  • [26] Improving public health emergency preparedness through enhanced decision-making environments: A simulation and survey based evaluation
    Araz, Ozgur M.
    Jehn, Megan
    TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2013, 80 (09) : 1775 - 1781
  • [27] Evaluation of evidence-based practice learning among undergraduate nursing students: Relationship between self-reported and objective assessment
    Ruzafa-Martinez, Maria
    Leal-Costa, Cesar
    Garcia-Gonzalez, Jessica
    Sanchez-Torrano, Maria
    Ramos-Morcillo, Antonio Jesus
    NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2021, 105
  • [28] Improving engagement in evidence-based psychological treatments among Veterans: Direct-to-consumer outreach and pretreatment shared decision-making
    Karlin, Bradley E.
    Brenner, Lisa A.
    CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY-SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2020, 27 (04)
  • [29] Active vs. computer-based passive decision-making leads to discrepancies in outcome evaluation: evidence from self-reported emotional experience and brain activity
    Tao, Ruiwen
    Zhang, Can
    Zhao, Hanxuan
    Xu, Sihua
    CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2023, 33 (20) : 10676 - 10685
  • [30] Evidence-based decision-making in nursing - development and piloting of a train-the-trainer concept for teachers at schools for health care professionals: A pilot study
    Rahner, Marianne
    Krueger, Lars
    Aumiller, Monika
    Jahn, Magnus
    Erblich, Michael
    Zacher, Sandro
    Berger-Hoeger, Birte
    Becker, Ralf
    Steckelberg, Anke
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVIDENZ FORTBILDUNG UND QUALITAET IM GESUNDHEITSWESEN, 2022, 175 : 81 - 88