Relationship of ruffed grouse (Bonasa umbellus) home range size to landscape characteristics

被引:0
|
作者
Fearer, TM [1 ]
Stauffer, DF [1 ]
机构
[1] Virginia Polytech Inst & State Univ, Dept Fisheries & Wildlife, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
来源
AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST | 2003年 / 150卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.1674/0003-0031(2003)150[0104:RORGBU]2.0.CO;2
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
We investigated how size and spatial arrangement of landscape-level habitat types influenced home range size of ruffed grouse (Bonasa umbellus) in Virginia. Grouse home ranges were overlaid onto a GIS database derived from Landsat TM imagery (30-m pixel scale) and landscape metrics were calculated for 22 habitat types. We used multiple regression to relate home range size to landscape metrics. The amount of core area within the habitat patches in a bird's home range, number of different habitat types, mean shape index of the habitat patches (all positive relations), and amount of high contrast edge (negative relation) predicted home range size (R-adj(2) = 0.617, P<0.01). Our results suggested that landscapes containing small (0.5-5 ha), regularly shaped (e.g., square) patches with high interspersion of preferred habitat types and air extensive amount of high contrast edge will decrease ruffed grouse home range size and movement. Such landscapes may contain ruffed grouse habitat requirements within smaller areas, thereby reducing travel Costs, decreasing exposure to predators and increasing survival.
引用
收藏
页码:104 / 114
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Short-term impact of clearcutting with protected regeneration on the ruffed grouse (Bonasa umbellus) in a boreal forest
    Dussault, C
    Courtois, R
    Ferron, J
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH-REVUE CANADIENNE DE RECHERCHE FORESTIERE, 1998, 28 (03): : 468 - 477
  • [42] Aromatase expression in the brain of the ruffed grouse (Bonasa umbellus) and comparisons with other galliform birds (Aves, Galliformes)
    Corfield, Jeremy R.
    Harada, Nobuhiro
    Iwaniuk, Andrew N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL NEUROANATOMY, 2013, 47 : 15 - 27
  • [43] West Nile Virus Infection in Ruffed Grouse (Bonasa umbellus): Experimental Infection and Protective Effects of Vaccination
    Nemeth, Nicole M.
    Bosco-Lauth, Angela M.
    Williams, Lisa M.
    Bowen, Richard A.
    Brown, Justin D.
    [J]. VETERINARY PATHOLOGY, 2017, 54 (06) : 901 - 911
  • [44] Eastern Equine Encephalitis Virus in Visibly Affected Ruffed Grouse (Bonasa umbellus) in Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin, USA
    Anderson, Meredith
    Melotti, Julie
    Dinh, Emily
    Fitzgerald, Scott D.
    Cooley, Thomas M.
    Bolin, Steven
    Elsmo, Elizabeth J.
    Businga, Nancy
    Wunschmann, Arno
    Carstensen, Michelle
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE DISEASES, 2021, 57 (02) : 453 - 456
  • [45] PLASMA-CONCENTRATIONS OF PROLACTIN DURING EGG-LAYING AND INCUBATION IN THE RUFFED GROUSE (BONASA-UMBELLUS)
    ETCHES, RJ
    GARBUTT, A
    MIDDLETON, AL
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE ZOOLOGIE, 1979, 57 (08): : 1624 - 1627
  • [46] Habitat selection and home range size of Ruffed Grouse in Rhode Island
    Endrulat, EG
    McWilliams, SR
    Tefft, BC
    [J]. NORTHEASTERN NATURALIST, 2005, 12 (04) : 411 - 424
  • [47] Ruffed Grouse Bonasa umbellus habitat selection in a spatially complex forest:: evidence for spatial constraints on patch selection
    Zimmerman, Guthrie S.
    Gutierrez, R. J.
    [J]. IBIS, 2008, 150 (04) : 746 - 755
  • [48] BLOOD PARASITES OF RUFFED GROUSE (BONASA-UMBELLUS) FROM KENTUCKY, MAINE, MICHIGAN, AND WEST-VIRGINIA
    EVE, JH
    DAVIDSON, WR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PARASITOLOGY, 1976, 62 (01) : 142 - 144
  • [49] OBSERVATIONS ON LIFE CYCLE OF DAVAINEA TETRAOENSIS FUHRMANN 1919 (PLATYHELMINTHES-CESTODA) APARASITE OF RUFFED GROUSE (BONASA UMBELLUS)
    DICK, TA
    BURT, MDB
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 1967, 45 (02): : 233 - &
  • [50] PREVALENCE OF TANAISIA-ZARUDNYI (TREMATODA, EUCOTYLIDAE) FROM RUFFED GROUSE (BONASA-UMBELLUS) IN 2 WISCONSIN COUNTIES
    TAFT, SJ
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE HELMINTHOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON, 1981, 48 (02): : 245 - 246