Patient information in radiation oncology: a cross-sectional pilot study using the EORTC QLQ-INFO26 module

被引:34
|
作者
Adler, Johannes [1 ]
Paelecke-Habermann, Yvonne [2 ]
Jahn, Patrick [3 ]
Landenberger, Margarete [3 ]
Leplow, Bernd [2 ]
Vordermark, Dirk [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Halle Wittenberg, Dept Radiat Oncol, Halle, Germany
[2] Univ Halle Wittenberg, Dept Psychol, Halle, Germany
[3] Univ Halle Wittenberg, Inst Nursing & Hlth Sci, Halle, Germany
来源
RADIATION ONCOLOGY | 2009年 / 4卷
关键词
CANCER-PATIENTS; PREFERENCES; INTERNET; QUESTIONNAIRE; IMPACT; CARE;
D O I
10.1186/1748-717X-4-40
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The availability of alternative sources of information, e. g. the internet, may influence the quantity and quality of information cancer patients receive regarding their disease and treatment. The purpose of the present study was to assess perception of information in cancer patients during radiotherapy as well as media preferences and specifically the utilization of the internet. Methods: In a cross-sectional, single-centre study 94 patients currently undergoing radiotherapy were asked to complete two questionnaires. The EORTC QLQ-INFO26 module was used to assess the quality and quantity of information received by patients in the areas disease, medical tests, treatment, other services, different places of care and how to help themselves, as well as qualitative aspects as helpfulness of and satisfaction with this information. The importance of different media, in particular the internet, was investigated by a nine-item questionnaire. Results: The response rate was n = 72 patients (77%). Patients felt best informed concerning medical tests (mean +/- SD score 79 +/- 22, scale 0-100) followed by disease (68 +/- 21). Treatment (52 +/- 24) and different places of care and other services (30 +/- 36 and 30 +/- 30, respectively) ranked last. 37% of patients were very satisfied and 37% moderately satisfied with the amount of information received, 61% wished more information. Among eight media, brochures, television and internet were ranked as most important. 41% used the internet themselves or via friends or family, mostly for research of classic and alternative treatment options. Unavailability and the necessity of computer skills were most mentioned obstacles. Conclusion: In a single-center pilot study, radiotherapy patients indicated having received most information about medical tests and their disease. Patients very satisfied with their information had received the largest amount of information. Brochures, television and internet were the most important media. Individual patient needs should be considered in the development of novel information strategies.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Assessing the acceptability, reliability, and validity of the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) in Kenyan cancer patiYents: a cross-sectional study
    Davda, Jasmine
    Kibet, Hillary
    Achieng, Emmah
    Atundo, Lawrence
    Komen, Truphena
    JOURNAL OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES, 2021, 5 (01)
  • [22] Updated normative data for the EORTC QLQ-C30 in the general Dutch population by age and sex: a cross-sectional panel research study
    K. M. de Ligt
    N. K. Aaronson
    G. Liegl
    S. Nolte
    Quality of Life Research, 2023, 32 : 2477 - 2487
  • [23] Patient Knowledge and Perception of Radiation Risk in Diagnostic Imaging: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Sweetman, Stephen John
    Bernard, Jason
    JOURNAL OF PATIENT EXPERIENCE, 2020, 7 (01): : 110 - 115
  • [24] YouTube as a Source of Patient Information on External Cephalic Version:Cross-Sectional Study
    van Dijk, Merle R.
    van der Marel, Anne-Fleur
    van Rheenen-Flach, Leonie E.
    Ganzevoort, Wessel
    Moll, Etelka
    Scheele, Fedde
    Velzel, Joost
    JMIR FORMATIVE RESEARCH, 2024, 8
  • [25] Informed consent in oncology clinical trials: A Brown University Oncology Research Group prospective cross-sectional pilot study
    Schumacher, Andrew
    Sikov, William M.
    Quesenberry, Matthew I.
    Safran, Howard
    Khurshid, Humera
    Mitchell, Kristen M.
    Olszewski, Adam J.
    PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (02):
  • [26] Assessing the reliability and validity of comprehensive score for financial toxicity (COST) among radiation oncology patients in India: a cross-sectional pilot study
    Dar, Mukhtar Ahmad
    Chauhan, Richa
    Sharma, Krishna Kumar
    Trivedi, Vinita
    Dhingra, Sameer
    Murti, Krishna
    ECANCERMEDICALSCIENCE, 2021, 15
  • [27] Evaluation of the Theoretical Teaching of Postgraduate Radiation Oncology Medical Residents in France: a Cross-Sectional Study
    Faivre, Jean-Christophe
    Bibault, Jean-Emmanuel
    Leroy, Thomas
    Agopiantz, Mikael
    Salleron, Julia
    Wack, Maxime
    Janoray, Guillaume
    Roche, Henri
    Culine, Stephane
    Rivera, Sofia
    JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION, 2018, 33 (02) : 383 - 390
  • [28] Pilot Cross-Sectional Quality of Life Study of a Diverse Endocrine Surgery Patient Population
    Lu, Jana
    Zheng, Hui
    Lai, Victoria
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2022, 278 : 257 - 266
  • [29] Evaluation of the Theoretical Teaching of Postgraduate Radiation Oncology Medical Residents in France: a Cross-Sectional Study
    Jean-Christophe Faivre
    Jean-Emmanuel Bibault
    Thomas Leroy
    Mikaël Agopiantz
    Julia Salleron
    Maxime Wack
    Guillaume Janoray
    Henri Roché
    Stéphane Culine
    Sofia Rivera
    Journal of Cancer Education, 2018, 33 : 383 - 390
  • [30] Auto-delineation of the hippocampus using Mask R-CNN for radiation oncology: A cross-sectional observational study
    Laud, Adwait
    Talapatra, Kaustav
    Sankhe, Manoj
    Gupte, Ajinkya
    Shetty, Ashish
    Bardeskar, Nikhil
    Kanikar, Prashasti
    Rout, Abhishek
    Barsing, Shubhangi
    Tiwari, Pranjal
    Shah, Arya
    Patkar, Deepak
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2024, 20 (06)