Patient information in radiation oncology: a cross-sectional pilot study using the EORTC QLQ-INFO26 module

被引:34
|
作者
Adler, Johannes [1 ]
Paelecke-Habermann, Yvonne [2 ]
Jahn, Patrick [3 ]
Landenberger, Margarete [3 ]
Leplow, Bernd [2 ]
Vordermark, Dirk [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Halle Wittenberg, Dept Radiat Oncol, Halle, Germany
[2] Univ Halle Wittenberg, Dept Psychol, Halle, Germany
[3] Univ Halle Wittenberg, Inst Nursing & Hlth Sci, Halle, Germany
来源
RADIATION ONCOLOGY | 2009年 / 4卷
关键词
CANCER-PATIENTS; PREFERENCES; INTERNET; QUESTIONNAIRE; IMPACT; CARE;
D O I
10.1186/1748-717X-4-40
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The availability of alternative sources of information, e. g. the internet, may influence the quantity and quality of information cancer patients receive regarding their disease and treatment. The purpose of the present study was to assess perception of information in cancer patients during radiotherapy as well as media preferences and specifically the utilization of the internet. Methods: In a cross-sectional, single-centre study 94 patients currently undergoing radiotherapy were asked to complete two questionnaires. The EORTC QLQ-INFO26 module was used to assess the quality and quantity of information received by patients in the areas disease, medical tests, treatment, other services, different places of care and how to help themselves, as well as qualitative aspects as helpfulness of and satisfaction with this information. The importance of different media, in particular the internet, was investigated by a nine-item questionnaire. Results: The response rate was n = 72 patients (77%). Patients felt best informed concerning medical tests (mean +/- SD score 79 +/- 22, scale 0-100) followed by disease (68 +/- 21). Treatment (52 +/- 24) and different places of care and other services (30 +/- 36 and 30 +/- 30, respectively) ranked last. 37% of patients were very satisfied and 37% moderately satisfied with the amount of information received, 61% wished more information. Among eight media, brochures, television and internet were ranked as most important. 41% used the internet themselves or via friends or family, mostly for research of classic and alternative treatment options. Unavailability and the necessity of computer skills were most mentioned obstacles. Conclusion: In a single-center pilot study, radiotherapy patients indicated having received most information about medical tests and their disease. Patients very satisfied with their information had received the largest amount of information. Brochures, television and internet were the most important media. Individual patient needs should be considered in the development of novel information strategies.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Patient information in radiation oncology: a cross-sectional pilot study using the EORTC QLQ-INFO26 module
    Johannes Adler
    Yvonne Paelecke-Habermann
    Patrick Jahn
    Margarete Landenberger
    Bernd Leplow
    Dirk Vordermark
    Radiation Oncology, 4
  • [2] EORTC QLQ-INFO26: A questionnaire to assess information given to cancer patients a preliminary analysis in eight countries
    Arraras, Juan Ignacio
    Kuljanic-Vlasic, Karin
    Bjordal, Kristin
    Yun, Young Ho
    Efficace, Fabio
    Holzner, Bernhard
    Mills, Judith
    Greimel, Elfriede
    Krauss, Oliver
    Velikova, Galina
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2007, 16 (03) : 249 - 254
  • [3] Assessing the information needs of patients with hematology-oncology malignancies: a cross sectional study using the EORTC-QLQ-INFO25-questionnaire
    Zimmermann, N.
    ONCOLOGY RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2016, 39 : 322 - 322
  • [4] Sexual function using the EORTC QLQ-TC26 in testicular cancer survivors: A multi-institutional, cross-sectional study
    Koyama, Juntaro
    Yamashita, Shinichi
    Kakimoto, Kenichi
    Uemura, Motohide
    Kishida, Takeshi
    Kawai, Koji
    Nakamura, Terukazu
    Goto, Takayuki
    Osawa, Takahiro
    Nishimura, Kazuo
    Nonomura, Norio
    Nishiyama, Hiroyuki
    Shiraishi, Takumi
    Ukimura, Osamu
    Ogawa, Osamu
    Shinohara, Nobuo
    Suzukamo, Yoshimi
    Ito, Akihiro
    Arai, Yoichi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 30 (11) : 1044 - 1050
  • [5] Health-Related Quality of Life in Testicular Cancer Survivors in Japan: A Multi-Institutional, Cross-Sectional Study Using the EORTC QLQ-TC26
    Yamashita, Shinichi
    Kakimoto, Kenichi
    Uemura, Motohide
    Kishida, Takeshi
    Kawai, Koji
    Nakamura, Terukazu
    Goto, Takayuki
    Osawa, Takahiro
    Yamada, Shigeyuki
    Nishimura, Kazuo
    Nonomura, Norio
    Nishiyama, Hiroyuki
    Shiraishi, Takumi
    Ukimura, Osamu
    Ogawa, Osamu
    Shinohara, Nobuo
    Suzukamo, Yoshimi
    Ito, Akihiro
    Arai, Yoichi
    UROLOGY, 2021, 156 : 173 - 180
  • [6] Health-Related Quality of Life in Testicular Cancer Survivors in Japan: A Multi-Institutional, Cross-Sectional Study Using the EORTC QLQ-TC26 COMMENT
    Rodriguez-Pessoa, Rodrigo
    Cost, Nicholas
    Tevis, Sarah E.
    Kim, Simon P.
    UROLOGY, 2021, 156 : 180 - 180
  • [7] The potential for deprescribing in a palliative oncology patient population: a cross-sectional study
    van Merendonk, Lisanne N.
    Peters, Bas J. M.
    Mohlmann, Julia E.
    Hunting, Cornelis B.
    Kastelijn, Elisabeth A.
    van den Broek, Marcel P. H.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY, 2024, 31 (01) : 10 - 15
  • [8] Quality of life in very elderly radiotherapy patients: a prospective pilot study using the EORTC QLQ-ELD14 module
    Kaufmann, Anne
    Schmidt, Heike
    Ostheimer, Christian
    Ullrich, Janine
    Landenberger, Margarete
    Vordermark, Dirk
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2015, 23 (07) : 1883 - 1892
  • [9] Quality of life in very elderly radiotherapy patients: a prospective pilot study using the EORTC QLQ-ELD14 module
    Anne Kaufmann
    Heike Schmidt
    Christian Ostheimer
    Janine Ullrich
    Margarete Landenberger
    Dirk Vordermark
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2015, 23 : 1883 - 1892
  • [10] Radiation oncology outpatient perceptions of patient-centred care: a cross-sectional survey
    Mackenzie, Lisa J.
    Sanson-Fisher, Rob W.
    Carey, Mariko L.
    D'Este, Catherine A.
    BMJ OPEN, 2013, 3 (02):