A framework for the promotion of ethical benefit sharing in health research

被引:23
|
作者
Bedeker, Anja [1 ]
Nichols, Michelle [2 ]
Allie, Taryn [3 ]
Tamuhla, Tsaone [3 ]
van Heusden, Peter [1 ]
Olorunsogbon, Olorunyomi [4 ]
Tiffin, Nicki [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Cape, South African Natl Bioinformat Inst, South African Med Res Council, Bioinformat Unit, Bellville, South Africa
[2] Med Univ South Carolina, Coll Nursing, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
[3] Univ Cape Town, Computat Biol Div, Integrat Biomed Sci, Cape Town, South Africa
[4] Univ Ibadan, Fac Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Promot & Educ, Ibadan, Nigeria
来源
BMJ GLOBAL HEALTH | 2022年 / 7卷 / 02期
基金
比尔及梅琳达.盖茨基金会;
关键词
public health; POLICY; BIODIVERSITY; JUSTICE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1136/bmjgh-2021-008096
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
There is an increasing recognition of the importance of including benefit sharing in research programmes in order to ensure equitable and just distribution of the benefits arising from research. Whilst there are global efforts to promote benefit sharing when using non-human biological resources, benefit sharing plans and implementation do not yet feature prominently in research programmes, funding applications or requirements by ethics review boards. Whilst many research stakeholders may agree with the concept of benefit sharing, it can be difficult to operationalise benefit sharing within research programmes. We present a framework designed to assist with identifying benefit sharing opportunities in research programmes. The framework has two dimensions: the first represents microlevel, mesolevel and macrolevel stakeholders as defined using a socioecological model; and the second identifies nine different types of benefit sharing that might be achieved during a research programme. We provide an example matrix identifying different types of benefit sharing that might be undertaken during genomics research, and present a case study evaluating benefit sharing in Africa during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. This framework, with examples, is intended as a practical tool to assist research stakeholders with identifying opportunities for benefit sharing, and inculcating intentional benefit sharing in their research programmes from inception.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] ETHICAL DILEMMAS IN WORKPLACE HEALTH PROMOTION
    ALLEGRANTE, JP
    SLOAN, RP
    PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 1986, 15 (03) : 313 - 320
  • [22] ETHICAL DILEMMAS IN HEALTH PROMOTION - AN INTRODUCTION
    BURDINE, JN
    MCLEROY, KB
    GOTTLIEB, NH
    HEALTH EDUCATION QUARTERLY, 1987, 14 (01): : 7 - 9
  • [23] Viewing benefit sharing in global health research through the lens of Aristotelian justice
    Dauda, Bege
    Dierickx, Kris
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2017, 43 (06) : 417 - 421
  • [24] Toward a better understanding and application of benefit sharing in genomic and global health research
    Yakubu, Aminu
    Mc Cartney, Ann M.
    Sprumont, Dominique
    FRONTIERS IN GENETICS, 2023, 14
  • [25] Stakeholders understanding of the concept of benefit sharing in health research in Kenya: a qualitative study
    Lairumbi, Geoffrey M.
    Parker, Michael
    Fitzpatrick, Raymond
    Mike, English C.
    BMC MEDICAL ETHICS, 2011, 12
  • [26] Stakeholders understanding of the concept of benefit sharing in health research in Kenya: a qualitative study
    Geoffrey M Lairumbi
    Michael Parker
    Raymond Fitzpatrick
    English C Mike
    BMC Medical Ethics, 12
  • [27] Research sharing, ethics and public benefit
    Taylor, Patrick L.
    NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2007, 25 (04) : 398 - 401
  • [28] Research sharing, ethics and public benefit
    Patrick L Taylor
    Nature Biotechnology, 2007, 25 : 398 - 401
  • [29] A FRAMEWORK TO LINK INTERNATIONAL CLINICAL RESEARCH TO THE PROMOTION OF JUSTICE IN GLOBAL HEALTH
    Pratt, Bridget
    Loff, Bebe
    BIOETHICS, 2014, 28 (08) : 387 - 396
  • [30] North-south benefit sharing arrangements in bioprospecting and genetic research:: A critical ethical and legal analysis
    Schuklenk, Udo
    Kleinsmidt, Anita
    DEVELOPING WORLD BIOETHICS, 2006, 6 (03) : 122 - 134