Focal Therapy Is a Viable Treatment for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer

被引:3
|
作者
Berends, Joel [1 ]
Dupati, Ajith [1 ]
Dibianco, John [1 ]
George, Arvin K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Urol, 1500 E Med Ctr Dr,TC 3875, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
Focal therapy; HIFU; active surveillance; Prostate cancer; Cryoablation; ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE;
D O I
10.1089/end.2021.0235
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Focal therapy has been introduced as a novel treatment option for clinically localized prostate cancer. However, defining its role in the clinical space is still debated, especially with regards to identifying eligible candidates who will stand to benefit from treatment. Active surveillance (AS) is established as the preferred treatment for low-risk prostate cancer, with the goal of identifying those experiencing risk re-classification for curative intervention if it occurs. AS has been shown to be inferior to whole-gland treatments in to preventing progression or metastases. As a result, the field has sought solutions outside of the dichotomous options currently presented to men with low-risk cancer. Finally, the acceptance of preservation of sexual/urinary function and the avoidance of definitive therapy as valid endpoints has forced providers to think outside of survival alone as meaningful measures of success. It is here that focal therapy has emerged as a prospective replacement to AS or definitive treatment in carefully selected men. Combined with available risk stratification tools, focal ablation may afford patients durable oncological benefit while maintaining quality of life even in low-risk cancers.
引用
收藏
页码:1281 / 1283
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Racial Disparities in Low-Risk Prostate Cancer
    Ehdaie, Behfar
    Carlsson, Sigrid
    Vickers, Andrew
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2019, 321 (17): : 1726 - 1727
  • [42] Active Surveillance for Low-risk Prostate Cancer
    Mazzucchelli, Roberta
    Nesseris, Ioannis
    Cheng, Liang
    Lopez-Beltran, Antonio
    Montironi, Rodolfo
    Scarpelli, Marina
    [J]. ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2010, 30 (09) : 3683 - 3692
  • [43] Low-risk prostate cancer: Contemporary trends
    Cooperberg, Matthew R.
    Broering, Jeanette M.
    Bakst, Alan
    Kantoff, Philip W.
    Carroll, Peter R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 177 (04): : 68 - 69
  • [44] Active Surveillance for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer
    Laurence Klotz
    [J]. Current Urology Reports, 2015, 16
  • [45] Active Surveillance for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer
    Klotz, Laurence
    [J]. CURRENT UROLOGY REPORTS, 2015, 16 (04) : 1 - 10
  • [46] Low-risk prostate cancer: to treat or not to treat
    Freedland, Stephen J.
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2017, 18 (02): : 156 - 157
  • [47] Management dilemmas in low-risk prostate cancer
    Patel, Vipul R.
    Ganapathi, Hariharan Palayapalayam
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 118 (02) : 180 - 181
  • [48] Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer
    Bangma, Chris H.
    Bul, Meelan
    van der Kwast, Theo H.
    Pickles, Tom
    Korfage, Ida J.
    Hoeks, Caroline M.
    Steyerberg, Ewout W.
    Jenster, Guido
    Kattan, Michael W.
    Bellardita, Lara
    Carroll, Peter R.
    Denis, Louis J.
    Parker, Chris
    Roobol, Monique J.
    Emberton, Mark
    Klotz, Laurence H.
    Rannikko, Antti
    Kakehi, Yoshiyuki
    Lane, Janet A.
    Schroder, Fritz H.
    Semjonow, Axel
    Trock, Bruce J.
    Valdagni, Riccardo
    [J]. CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY, 2013, 85 (03) : 295 - 302
  • [49] Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer
    Hadjipavlou, Marios
    Promponas, John
    Madaan, Sanjeev
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL UROLOGY, 2015, 8 (06) : 420 - 428
  • [50] Very low-risk versus low-risk prostate cancer: A distinction worth keeping
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    [J]. PROSTATE, 2021, 81 (13): : 923 - 925