Benchmark dynamics in the environmental performance of ports

被引:33
|
作者
Puig, Marti [1 ]
Michail, Antonis [2 ]
Wooldridge, Chris [3 ]
Mari Darbra, Rosa [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Cataluna, Dept Chem Engn, Grp Tech Separating & Treating Ind Waste SETRI, BarcelonaTech, Diagonal 647, E-08028 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
[2] ESPO, Treurenberg 6, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium
[3] Cardiff Univ, Sch Earth & Ocean Sci, Main Bldg,Pk Pl, Cardiff CF10 3AT, S Glam, Wales
关键词
Environmental performance; Environmental management; Sustainable development; Port management;
D O I
10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.05.021
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper analyses the 2016 environmental benchmark performance of the port sector, based on a wide representation of EcoPorts members. This is the fifth time that this study has been conducted as an initiative of the European Sea Ports Organisation (ESPO). The data and results are derived from the Self-Diagnosis Method (SDM), a concise checklist against which port managers can self-assess the environmental management of their port in relation to the performance of the EcoPorts membership. The SDM tool was developed in the framework of the ECOPORTS project (2002-2005) and it is managed by ESPO. A total number of 91 ports from 20 different European Maritime States contributed to this evaluation. The main results are that air quality remains as the top environmental priority of the respondent ports, followed by energy consumption and noise. In terms of environmental management, the study confirms that key components are commonly implemented in the majority of European ports. 94% of contributing ports have a designated environmental manager, 92% own an environmental policy and 82% implement an environmental monitoring program. Waste is identified as the most monitored issue in ports (80%), followed by energy consumption (73%) and water quality (70%).
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 119
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [22] Understanding environmental security at ports and harbors
    Wenning, R. J.
    Apitz, E.
    Baba, A.
    Citron, M.
    Elliott, K.
    Al-Halasah, N.
    Kapusta, L.
    Lazarescu, M.
    Mohamed, M.
    Rutjes, R.
    MANAGING CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE RISKS: DECISION TOOLS AND APPLICATION FOR PORT SECURITY, 2007, : 3 - +
  • [23] Analysis of benchmark characteristics and benchmark performance prediction
    Saavedra, RH
    Smith, AJ
    ACM TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTER SYSTEMS, 1996, 14 (04): : 344 - 384
  • [24] Industrial dynamics and environmental performance in urban China
    He, Canfei
    Mao, Xiyan
    Zhu, Xiangdong
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 195 : 1512 - 1522
  • [25] Environmental Licensing as an Instrument for the Environmental Management of Brazilian Public Ports
    Braga, Rafael C. M. S.
    Veloso-Gomes, Fernando
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (06)
  • [26] A Causal Review of Dynamics in Indian Ports
    Sinha, Deepankar
    Bagodi, Virupaxi
    IIM KOZHIKODE SOCIETY & MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2019, 8 (01) : 60 - 73
  • [27] Measuring lean ports performance
    Marlow, Peter B.
    Casaca, Ana C. Paixão
    International Journal of Transport Management, 2003, 1 (04) : 189 - 202
  • [28] The role of ports in the dynamics of urban hierarchies
    Lugo, Igor
    Alatriste-Contreras, Martha G.
    Pumain, Denise
    MARITIME POLICY & MANAGEMENT, 2021, 48 (06) : 811 - 828
  • [29] Competition dynamics of ports in the Portuguese range
    Santos, T. A.
    Santos, A. M. P.
    Guedes Soares, C.
    TOWARDS GREEN MARINE TECHNOLOGY AND TRANSPORT, 2015, : 705 - 714
  • [30] Benchmark selection and performance
    Broeders, Dirk
    de Haan, Leo
    JOURNAL OF PENSION ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2020, 19 (04): : 511 - 531