Examining patient preferences in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis using a discrete-choice approach

被引:69
|
作者
Alten, Rieke [1 ]
Krueger, Klaus [2 ]
Rellecke, Julian [3 ]
Schiffner-Rohe, Julia [4 ]
Behmer, Olaf [5 ]
Schiffhorst, Guido [3 ]
Nolting, Hans-Dieter [3 ]
机构
[1] Charite, Schlosspk Klin, 2 Heubnerweg, D-14059 Berlin, Germany
[2] Praxiszentrum St Bonifatius, Munich, Germany
[3] IGES Inst GmbH, Berlin, Germany
[4] Pfizer Deutschland GmbH, Berlin, Germany
[5] Pfizer Pharma GmbH, Berlin, Germany
来源
关键词
rheumatoid arthritis; disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs; patient preferences; discrete-choice experiment; best-worst scaling; QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY; BELIEFS; WORST; ADHERENCE; MEDICATION; THERAPIES; INJECTION; MEDICINES;
D O I
10.2147/PPA.S117774
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) used in second-line treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are administered parenterally. However, so-called targeted synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARDs) - developed more recently-offer alternative (ie, oral) administration forms in second-line treatment. Since bDMARDs and tsDMARDs can be regarded as equal in terms of efficacy, the present study examines whether such characteristics as route of administration drive RA patients' treatment choice. This may ultimately suggest superiority of some second-line DMARDs over equally effective options, at least according to RA-patient preferences. Objective: The current study assessed the importance of oral administration among other treatment characteristics differing between available second-line DMARDs for RA patients' preferences using a discrete-choice experiment (DCE). Materials and methods: The DCE involved scenarios of three hypothetical treatment options in a d-efficient design with varying levels of key attributes (route and frequency of administration, time till onset of drug effect, combination therapy, possible side effects), as defined by focus groups. Further patient characteristics were recorded by an accompanying questionnaire. In the DCE, patients were asked to choose best and worst options (best-worst scaling). Results were analyzed by count analysis and adjusted regression analysis. Results: A total of 1,588 subjects completed the DCE and were eligible for final analyses. Across all characteristics included in the DCE, "oral administration" was most desired and "intravenous infusion" was most strongly rejected. This was followed by "no combination with methotrexate" being strongly preferred and "intake every 1-2 weeks" being strongly rejected. On average, levels of route of administration showed strongest influences on patients' decisions in post hoc bootstrapping analysis. Conclusion: According to the results, an oral DMARD that does not have to be combined with methotrexate and is not administered (only) every 1-2 weeks appears a highly favorable treatment option for patients with RA. DMARDs meeting these preferences may increase compliance and adherence in RA treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:2217 / 2228
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Line of therapy and patient preferences regarding lung cancer treatment: a discrete-choice experiment
    Janse, Sarah
    Janssen, Ellen
    Huwig, Tanya
    Basu Roy, Upal
    Ferris, Andrea
    Presley, Carolyn J.
    Bridges, John F. P.
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2021, 37 (04) : 643 - 653
  • [22] Patient preferences for treatment in type 2 diabetes: the Italian discrete-choice experiment analysis
    Marchesini, Giulio
    Pasqualetti, Patrizio
    Anichini, Roberto
    Caputo, Salvatore
    Memoli, Giuseppe
    Ponzani, Paola
    Resi, Veronica
    Rizzo, Manfredi
    Serviddio, Gaetano
    Zanette, Giorgio
    ACTA DIABETOLOGICA, 2019, 56 (03) : 289 - 299
  • [23] Evaluation of Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients' Preferences Using Discrete Choice Experiment
    Kawatkar, Aniket
    ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY, 2019, 71
  • [24] Patient preferences on rheumatoid arthritis second-line treatment: a discrete choice experiment of Swedish patients
    Bywall, Karin Scholin
    Kihlbom, Ulrik
    Hansson, Mats
    Falahee, Marie
    Raza, Karim
    Baecklund, Eva
    Veldwijk, Jorien
    ARTHRITIS RESEARCH & THERAPY, 2020, 22 (01)
  • [25] Patient preferences on rheumatoid arthritis second-line treatment: a discrete choice experiment of Swedish patients
    Karin Schölin Bywall
    Ulrik Kihlbom
    Mats Hansson
    Marie Falahee
    Karim Raza
    Eva Baecklund
    Jorien Veldwijk
    Arthritis Research & Therapy, 22
  • [26] Patients’ preferences for osteoporosis drug treatment: a discrete-choice experiment
    Mickaël Hiligsmann
    Benedict G Dellaert
    Carmen D Dirksen
    Trudy van der Weijden
    Stefan Goemaere
    Jean-Yves Reginster
    Verity Watson
    Annelies Boonen
    Arthritis Research & Therapy, 16
  • [27] Quantifying patient preferences for systemic atopic dermatitis treatments using a discrete-choice experiment
    Boeri, Marco
    Sutphin, Jessie
    Hauber, Brett
    Cappelleri, Joseph C.
    Romero, William
    Di Bonaventura, Marco
    JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGICAL TREATMENT, 2022, 33 (03) : 1449 - 1458
  • [28] Chronic pain patients’ treatment preferences: a discrete-choice experiment
    Axel C. Mühlbacher
    Uwe Junker
    Christin Juhnke
    Edgar Stemmler
    Thomas Kohlmann
    Friedhelm Leverkus
    Matthias Nübling
    The European Journal of Health Economics, 2015, 16 : 613 - 628
  • [29] Patients' preferences for osteoporosis drug treatment: a discrete-choice experiment
    Hiligsmann, Mickael
    Dellaert, Benedict G.
    Dirksen, Carmen D.
    van der Weijden, Trudy
    Goemaere, Stefan
    Reginster, Jean-Yves
    Watson, Verity
    Boonen, Annelies
    ARTHRITIS RESEARCH & THERAPY, 2014, 16 (01)
  • [30] Chronic pain patients' treatment preferences: a discrete-choice experiment
    Muehlbacher, Axel C.
    Junker, Uwe
    Juhnke, Christin
    Stemmler, Edgar
    Kohlmann, Thomas
    Leverkus, Friedhelm
    Nuebling, Matthias
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2015, 16 (06): : 613 - 628