Decompression with or without Fusion in Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis

被引:131
|
作者
Austevoll, Ivar M. [1 ]
Hermansen, Erland [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Fagerland, Morten W. [4 ]
Storheim, Kjersti [5 ,7 ]
Brox, Jens I. [6 ,8 ]
Solberg, Tore [15 ,16 ]
Rekeland, Frode [1 ,2 ]
Franssen, Eric [17 ]
Weber, Clemens [18 ,19 ]
Brisby, Helena [21 ]
Grundnes, Oliver [11 ]
Algaard, Knut R. H. [12 ]
Boker, Tordis [9 ,13 ]
Banitalebi, Hasan [10 ,20 ]
Indrekvam, Kari [1 ,2 ]
Hellum, Christian [14 ]
机构
[1] Haukeland Hosp, Orthoped Dept, Kysthosp Hagev, Hagaviksbakken 25,5217 Hagevik, Bergen, Norway
[2] Univ Bergen, Dept Clin Med, Bergen, Norway
[3] Alesund Hosp, More & Romsdal Hosp, Orthoped Dept, Alesund, Norway
[4] Oslo Ctr Biostat & Epidemiol, Res Support Serv, Oslo, Norway
[5] Res & Commun Unit Musculoskeletal Hlth, Div Clin Neurosci, Oslo, Norway
[6] Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Oslo, Norway
[7] Oslo Metropolitan Univ, Oslo Univ Hosp, Dept Physiotherapy, Oslo, Norway
[8] Med Fac, Oslo, Norway
[9] Inst Clin Med, Fac Med, Div Radiol & Nucl Med, Oslo, Norway
[10] Inst Clin Med, Oslo, Norway
[11] Univ Oslo, Akershus Univ Hosp, Orthoped Dept, Oslo, Norway
[12] Unilabs Radiol, Radiol, Oslo, Norway
[13] Dept Radiol & Nucl Med, Oslo, Norway
[14] Div Orthoped Surg, Oslo, Norway
[15] Oslo Univ Hosp Ulleval, Inst Clin Med, Univ Tromso, Arctic Univ Norway, Oslo, Norway
[16] Univ Hosp North Norway, Norwegian Registry Spine Surg, Tromso, Norway
[17] Stavanger Univ Hosp, Orthoped Dept, Stavanger, Norway
[18] Stavanger Univ Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Stavanger, Norway
[19] Univ Stavanger, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Qual & Hlth Technol, Stavanger, Norway
[20] Akershus Univ Hosp, Dept Diagnost Imaging, Lorenskog, Norway
[21] Univ Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Acad, Inst Clin Sci, Gothenburg, Sweden
来源
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE | 2021年 / 385卷 / 06期
关键词
SPINAL STENOSIS; PLUS FUSION; SURGERY; NONINFERIORITY; TRENDS; TREAT; PAIN;
D O I
10.1056/NEJMoa2100990
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background In patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis, it is uncertain whether decompression surgery alone is noninferior to decompression with instrumented fusion. Methods We conducted an open-label, multicenter, noninferiority trial involving patients with symptomatic lumbar stenosis that had not responded to conservative management and who had single-level spondylolisthesis of 3 mm or more. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to undergo decompression surgery (decompression-alone group) or decompression surgery with instrumented fusion (fusion group). The primary outcome was a reduction of at least 30% in the score on the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI; range, 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more impairment) during the 2 years after surgery, with a noninferiority margin of -15 percentage points. Secondary outcomes included the mean change in the ODI score as well as scores on the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire, leg and back pain, the duration of surgery and length of hospital stay, and reoperation within 2 years. Results The mean age of patients was approximately 66 years. Approximately 75% of the patients had leg pain for more than a year, and more than 80% had back pain for more than a year. The mean change from baseline to 2 years in the ODI score was -20.6 in the decompression-alone group and -21.3 in the fusion group (mean difference, 0.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.8 to 4.3). In the modified intention-to-treat analysis, 95 of 133 patients (71.4%) in the decompression-alone group and 94 of 129 patients (72.9%) in the fusion group had a reduction of at least 30% in the ODI score (difference, -1.4 percentage points; 95% CI, -12.2 to 9.4), showing the noninferiority of decompression alone. In the per-protocol analysis, 80 of 106 patients (75.5%) and 83 of 110 patients (75.5%), respectively, had a reduction of at least 30% in the ODI score (difference, 0.0 percentage points; 95% CI, -11.4 to 11.4), showing noninferiority. The results for the secondary outcomes were generally in the same direction as those for the primary outcome. Successful fusion was achieved with certainty in 86 of 100 patients (86.0%) who had imaging available at 2 years. Reoperation was performed in 15 of 120 patients (12.5%) in the decompression-alone group and in 11 of 121 patients (9.1%) in the fusion group. Conclusions In this trial involving patients who underwent surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis, most of whom had symptoms for more than a year, decompression alone was noninferior to decompression with instrumented fusion over a period of 2 years. Reoperation occurred somewhat more often in the decompression-alone group than in the fusion group. (NORDSTEN-DS ClinicalTrials.gov number, .) Decompression versus Fusion for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis In a randomized trial conducted in Norway, decompression surgery alone was noninferior to decompression with instrumented fusion with respect to the percentage of patients who had a 30% reduction on a scale of pain and disability over a period of 2 years, with a noninferiority margin of -15 percentage points.
引用
收藏
页码:526 / 538
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Radiographic predictors of delayed instability following decompression without fusion for degenerative Grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis Clinical article
    Blumenthal, Claire
    Curran, Jill
    Benzel, Edward C.
    Potter, Rachel
    Magge, Subu N.
    Harrington, J. Frederick, Jr.
    Coumans, Jean-Valery
    Ghogawala, Zoher
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2013, 18 (04) : 340 - 346
  • [22] Decompression plus fusion versus decompression alone for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Liang, Hai-Feng
    Liu, Shu-Hao
    Chen, Zi-Xian
    Fei, Qin-Ming
    [J]. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2017, 26 (12) : 3084 - 3095
  • [23] Decompression plus fusion versus decompression alone for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hai-Feng Liang
    Shu-Hao Liu
    Zi-Xian Chen
    Qin-Ming Fei
    [J]. European Spine Journal, 2017, 26 : 3084 - 3095
  • [24] Degenerative spondylolisthesis: Fusion with and without instrumentation
    Garfin, SR
    Vaccaro, AR
    [J]. LOW BACK PAIN: A SCIENTIFIC AND CLINICAL OVERVIEW, 1996, : 677 - 687
  • [25] Lumbar sagittal balance influences the clinical outcome after decompression and posterolateral spinal fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis
    Kawakami, M
    Tamaki, T
    Ando, M
    Yamada, H
    Hashizume, H
    Yoshida, M
    [J]. SPINE, 2002, 27 (01) : 59 - 64
  • [26] Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: Decompression vs. Decompression plus Fusion
    Haertle, Marco
    [J]. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ORTHOPADIE UND UNFALLCHIRURGIE, 2022, 160 (01): : 19 - 19
  • [27] Comparative Effectiveness of Microdecompression Alone vs Decompression Plus Instrumented Fusion in Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis
    Austevoll, Ivar Magne
    Gjestad, Rolf
    Solberg, Tore
    Storheim, Kjersti
    Brox, Jens Ivar
    Hermansen, Erland
    Rekeland, Frode
    Indrekvam, Kari
    Hellum, Christian
    [J]. JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2020, 3 (09)
  • [28] Lumbar Decompression and Interbody Fusion Improves Gait Performance, Pain, and Psychosocial Factors of Patients With Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
    Haddas, Ram
    Sandu, Cezar D.
    Mar, Damon
    Block, Andrew
    Lieberman, Isador
    [J]. GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2021, 11 (04) : 472 - 479
  • [29] Guidelines for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 10: fusion following decompression in patients with stenosis without spondylolisthesis
    Resnick, DK
    Choudhri, TF
    Dailey, AT
    Groff, MW
    Khoo, L
    Matz, PG
    Mummaneni, P
    Watters, WC
    Wang, J
    Walters, BC
    Hadley, MN
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2005, 2 (06) : 686 - 691
  • [30] The outcome of decompression alone for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis
    Ahmad, Sarfraz
    Hamad, Abdulkader
    Bhalla, Amit
    Turner, Sarah
    Balain, Birender
    Jaffray, David
    [J]. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2017, 26 (02) : 414 - 419