Safety and efficacy of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device in the treatment of atypical endometrial hyperplasia and early endometrial cancer

被引:5
|
作者
Hirata, Toru [1 ,2 ]
Kondo, Eiji [1 ]
Magawa, Shoichi [1 ]
Kubo-Kaneda, Michiko [1 ]
Nii, Masafumi [1 ]
Yoshida, Kenta [1 ]
Maezawa, Tadashi [1 ]
Tabata, Tsutomu [3 ]
Ikeda, Tomoaki [1 ]
机构
[1] Mie Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Sch Med, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu, Mie 5148507, Japan
[2] Kuwana City Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Kuwana, Mie, Japan
[3] Tokyo Womens Med Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
endometrial adenocarcinoma; endometrial hyperplasia; fertility; levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system; uterine cancer; FERTILITY-SPARING TREATMENT; YOUNG-WOMEN; MEDROXYPROGESTERONE ACETATE; PROGESTOGEN TREATMENT; PHASE-II; SYSTEM; ADENOCARCINOMA; MANAGEMENT; CARCINOMA; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1111/jog.15408
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Aim To investigate the recurrence rate, live-birth rate, and treatment outcomes of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device (LNG-IUD) for the management of atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) or Grade-1 endometrial cancer (EC) in patients who desire fertility-sparing treatment and those seeking conservative treatment without fertility preservation. Methods We prospectively enrolled nine patients from a single institution between April 2009 and September 2013 who were followed up for 60 months after LNG-IUD insertion. Results The median patient age was 35 (range: 29-39) years. The overall recurrence rate was 56% (5/9). The median interval between removal of the LNG-IUD and recurrence was 20.5 (range: 2-30) months. Three of the nine patients had Grade-1 EC, and six had AEH. The response rates to the LNG-IUD in patients with Grade-1 EC and AEH were 66% and 100%, respectively. Four patients (three with AEH, one with Grade-1 EC) experienced recurrence 6 months after MPA treatment and all 4 (100%) had complete response. Eight patients desired fertility preservation, of which 37% (3/8) conceived after receiving fertility treatment and 25% (2/8) had a live birth; the remaining three had previously received MPA for 6 months and had a recurrence; of these, 1 had a live birth. Conclusion LNG-IUD is effective for the management of AEH and EC in young patients who desire fertility-sparing treatment, including those ineligible for MPA owing to the presence of comorbidities and those with recurrence after MPA treatment (6-month treatment), and patients seeking conservative treatment without fertility preservation.
引用
收藏
页码:3219 / 3225
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Re: The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device induces endometrial decidualisation in women on tamoxifen
    Omar, Ola A. M.
    Ewies, Ayman
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2021, 41 (02) : 332 - 332
  • [22] Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device versus hysteroscopic endometrial resection in the treatment of dysfunctional uterine bleeding
    Crosignani, PG
    Vercellini, P
    Mosconi, P
    Oldani, S
    Cortesi, I
    DeGiorgi, O
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 90 (02): : 257 - 263
  • [23] Hysteroscopic Endometrial Focal Resection followed by Levonorgestrel Intrauterine Device Insertion as a Fertility-Sparing Treatment of Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia and Early Endometrial Cancer: A Retrospective Study
    Giampaolino, Pierluigi
    Sardo, Attilio Di Spiezio
    Mollo, Antonio
    Raffone, Antonio
    Travaglino, Antonio
    Boccellino, Antonio
    Zizolfi, Brunella
    Insabato, Luigi
    Zullo, Fulvio
    De Placido, Giuseppe
    Bifulco, Giuseppe
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 26 (04) : 648 - 656
  • [24] Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (Mirena) in compare to medroxyprogesterone acetate as a therapy for endometrial hyperplasia
    Behnamfar, Fariba
    Ghahiri, Attaollah
    Tavakoli, Marzieh
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2014, 19 (08): : 686 - 690
  • [25] Comparing Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (Mirena) and medroxyprogesterone acetate as a therapy for endometrial hyperplasia
    Behnamfar, F.
    Ghahiri, A.
    Tavakoli, M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2016, 26 : 961 - 961
  • [26] Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System Alone as Primary Treatment in Young Women with Early Endometrial Cancer: Case Report
    Fambrini, Massimiliano
    Bargelli, Gianni
    Peruzzi, Elena
    Buccoliero, Anna Maria
    Pieralli, Annalisa
    Andersson, Karin L.
    Scarselli, Gianfranco
    Gallorini, Marcella
    Zolfanelli, Federica
    Marchionni, Mauro
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 16 (05) : 630 - 633
  • [27] Vaginal micronized progesterone versus the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system for treatment of non-atypical endometrial hyperplasia: A randomized controlled trial
    Gezer, Sener
    Kole, Emre
    Aksoy, Lale
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2023, 161 (02) : 661 - 666
  • [28] Endometrial Cancer Following Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System Insertion in Young Women with Atypical Hyperplasia: Two Case Reports and Literature Review
    Hongfa Peng
    Jingjing Jiang
    Xiaodong Li
    [J]. Reproductive Sciences, 2022, 29 : 3278 - 3284
  • [29] Endometrial Cancer Following Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System Insertion in Young Women with Atypical Hyperplasia: Two Case Reports and Literature Review
    Peng, Hongfa
    Jiang, Jingjing
    Li, Xiaodong
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2022, 29 (11) : 3278 - 3284
  • [30] Successful pregnancy following insertion of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in two infertile patients with complex atypical endometrial hyperplasia
    Qi, Xiujuan
    Zhao, Wencui
    Duan, Yuying
    Li, Yujun
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC AND OBSTETRIC INVESTIGATION, 2008, 65 (04) : 266 - 268