Depression Screening on a Maternity Unit: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of Nurses' Views and Implementation Strategies

被引:13
|
作者
Segre, Lisa S. [1 ]
Pollack, Lauren O. [2 ]
Brock, Rebecca L. [3 ]
Andrew, Jeana R. [4 ,5 ]
O'Hara, Michael W. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Iowa, Coll Nursing, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[2] Univ Missouri, Dept Psychol, Kansas City, MO 64110 USA
[3] Univ Iowa, Dept Psychol, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[4] Univ Iowa Hosp & Clin, Nursing Childrens Serv, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[5] Univ Iowa Hosp & Clin, Womens Serv, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
关键词
POSTPARTUM DEPRESSION; PERINATAL DEPRESSION; POSTNATAL-DEPRESSION; HEALTH-CARE; PREVALENCE; DISORDERS; KNOWLEDGE; WOMEN;
D O I
10.3109/01612840.2013.879358
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Postpartum women often suffer clinically significant depressive symptoms, a problem addressed by nurse-delivered screening programs. In the past, success of these identification programs was measured in terms of screening rates; however, merely evaluating the screening rate does little to inform how to implement depression screening in clinical practice. This article describes the experiences of nurses in implementing depression screening on a maternity unit. We evaluate the practice qualitatively, by asking nurses to describe their screening strategies and their views about implementation, as well as quantitatively by assessing their screening rates and the number of women identified. Utilizing a framework of program evaluation, 20 maternity unit nurses completed qualitative assessments investigating their day-to-day experiences with this practice. To include the perspectives of nurses that declined to participate in qualitative assessments, 14 additional maternity unit nurses completed a brief survey assessing their views. We also assessed screening rates, defined as the number of women screened divided by the number eligible for screening. Maternity unit nurses viewed depression screening positively and were able to screen patients in relatively few steps, which they implemented using strategies they had developed themselves. Despite nurses' ongoing concern about finding time to screen, they achieved high screening rates and, with one exception, indicated they would opt to continue voluntarily. Depression screening on the maternity unit is feasible and embraced by attending nurses. The clinical strategies used to implement screening are extensively described and provide a basis for implementation in other settings that serve perinatal women.
引用
收藏
页码:444 / 454
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Examining the Implementation of the Free Maternity Services Policy in Kenya: A Mixed Methods Process Evaluation
    Tama, Eric
    Molyneux, Sassy
    Waweru, Evelyn
    Tsofa, Benjamin
    Chuma, Jane
    Barasa, Edwine
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLICY AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 7 (07): : 603 - 613
  • [22] Implementation of community screening strategies for depression
    Jorge Arias de la Torre
    Amy Ronaldson
    Gemma Vilagut
    Gonzalo Martínez-Alés
    Alex Dregan
    Ioannis Bakolis
    Jose M. Valderas
    Antonio J. Molina
    Vicente Martín
    Juan Ángel Bellón
    Jordi Alonso
    [J]. Nature Medicine, 2024, 30 : 930 - 932
  • [23] A Mixed-Methods Process Evaluation: Integrating Depression Treatment Into HIV Care in Malawi
    Stockton, Melissa A.
    Minnick, Caroline E.
    Kulisewa, Kazione
    Mphonda, Steven M.
    Hosseinipour, Mina C.
    Gaynes, Bradley N.
    Maselko, Joanna
    Pettifor, Audrey E.
    Go, Vivian
    Udedi, Michael
    Pence, Brian W.
    [J]. GLOBAL HEALTH-SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2021, 9 (03): : 611 - 625
  • [24] Association between the number of adopted implementation strategies and contextual determinants: a mixed-methods study
    Karabukayeva, Aizhan
    Hearld, Larry R.
    Kelly, Reena
    Hall, Allyson
    Singh, Jasvinder
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [25] Providing respectful maternity care in northern Ghana: A mixed-methods study with maternity care providers
    Moyer, Cheryl A.
    McNally, Brienne
    Aborigo, Raymond A.
    Williams, John E. O.
    Afulani, Patience
    [J]. MIDWIFERY, 2021, 94
  • [26] A mixed-methods process evaluation of Family Navigation implementation for autism spectrum disorder
    Broder-Fingert, Sarabeth
    Qin, Sarah
    Goupil, Julia
    Rosenberg, Jessica
    Augustyn, Marilyn
    Blum, Nate
    Bennett, Amanda
    Weitzman, Carol
    Guevara, James P.
    Fenick, Ada
    Silverstein, Michael
    Feinberg, Emily
    [J]. AUTISM, 2019, 23 (05) : 1288 - 1299
  • [27] Missed opportunities in hypertension risk factors screening in Indonesia: a mixed-methods evaluation of integrated health post (POSBINDU) implementation
    Widyaningsih, Vitri
    Febrinasari, Ratih Puspita
    Pamungkasari, Eti Poncorini
    Mashuri, Yusuf Ari
    Sumardiyono, Sumardiyono
    Balgis, Balgis
    Koot, Jaap
    Landsman-Dijkstra, Jeanet
    Probandari, Ari
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (02):
  • [28] 'Depression is not a familiar word': A mixed-methods approach to describe the experience of primary care nurses treating depression in rural Guatemala
    Stryker, Shanna D.
    Kishton, Rachel
    Nichols, Beatrice
    Hargraves, Daniel
    Goodnow, Keesha
    Doarn, Charles R.
    Brown, Jennifer L.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHIATRY, 2022, 68 (08) : 1644 - 1653
  • [29] A mixed-methods evaluation of the Vamos por Mas! parenting program implementation in Chile
    Meyer, Jessica K. V.
    Diaspro, Gabriela
    Munoz, Ivan
    Burmeister, Catalina
    Garcia-Huidobro, Diego
    [J]. JBI EVIDENCE IMPLEMENTATION, 2023, 21 (01): : 101 - 112
  • [30] Electronic Clinical Communications Implementation (ECCI) in Scotland: a mixed-methods programme evaluation
    Pagliari, C
    Gilmour, M
    Sullivan, F
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2004, 10 (01) : 11 - 20