In-vessel components imaging systems: From the present experience towards ITER safe operation

被引:17
|
作者
Travere, J. -M. [1 ]
机构
[1] IRFM, CEA, F-13108 St Paul Les Durance, France
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
ITER; Imaging diagnostics; Image processing; Quantitative imaging; Computer-aided vision; Real-time; Tore Supra; INFRARED THERMOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1016/j.fusengdes.2009.01.038
中图分类号
TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];
学科分类号
0827 ; 082701 ;
摘要
Visual monitoring, control and inspection of in-vessel components are becoming more and more important for safe and reliable operation of existing fusion devices. It will be mandatory for ITER due to the low technological margin of in-vessel components to thermal overloads, high impact of potential damages and restrictions to in-vessel human access due to nuclear issues. In the recent years, imaging systems in infrared and visible light have been developed on existing facilities and in the perspective of ITER. They include complex optical systems that have to be integrated to the specific environment of fusion devices,with associated thermal, mechanical and neutron loads. At Tore Supra and JET, endoscopes have been installed to image plasma facing components (PFCs) during plasma operation for the purpose of real-time feedback and/or off-line analysis. Tore Supra has also recently been equipped with a remote inspection viewing system working under vacuum and high temperature, able to perform a survey of in-vessel components between plasma shots. Transposed to ITER constraints. the design of such imaging systems is very challenging. in particular as regards the neutron environment, the possible mirrors degradation and the overall active cooling in a reduced available space. The interpretation of the imaging is not trivial. There are for instance several issues in deriving in-vessel components surface temperature from an infrared imaging system, in particular in a metallic environment such as the one foreseen in ITER. Indeed, the temperature measurement depends on the emissivity of the surface which is not a priori known but also on the viewing direction, wavelength and physical state of the surface, the latter being subject to variations during plasma operation. Moreover, reflections from hot spots can also induce errors due to their parasitic contribution on the thermographic signal. In addition, due to the huge amount of data generated by these imaging systems, the use of advanced image processing techniques is required, starting from signal modeling, pattern recognition to heat flux estimate with on line identification of first wall material thermal features, possibly in real-time. The paper reports on the already achieved state of the art of all these issues in Tore Supra, JET, and explores the next steps towards a satisfactory implementation in ITER. (c) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1862 / 1866
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Assessment and selection of materials for ITER in-vessel components
    Kalinin, G
    Barabash, V
    Cardella, A
    Dietz, J
    Ioki, K
    Matera, R
    Santoro, RT
    Tivey, R
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MATERIALS, 2000, 283 : 10 - 19
  • [12] DEVELOPMENT OF CODES & STANDARDS FOR ITER IN-VESSEL COMPONENTS
    Couso, Daniel
    Fano, Jose
    Fernandez, Felicidad
    Fernandez, Elena
    Guirao, Julio A.
    Lastra, Jose L.
    Martinez, Victor J.
    Ordieres, Javier
    Vazquez, Ivan
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME PRESSURE VESSELS AND PIPING CONFERENCE VOL 1: CODES AND STANDARDS, 2012, : 313 - +
  • [13] Development of in-vessel components of the microfission chamber for ITER
    Ishikawa, M.
    Kondoh, T.
    Ookawa, K.
    Fujita, K.
    Yamauchi, M.
    Hayakawa, A.
    Nishitani, T.
    Kusama, Y.
    REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS, 2010, 81 (10):
  • [14] Remote handling and maintenance of ITER in-vessel components
    Burgess, T
    Haange, R
    Hattori, Y
    Heckendorn, F
    Ozaki, F
    Shibanuma, K
    Tesini, A
    Janeschitz, G
    Martin, E
    Sironi, M
    Herndon, J
    Maisonnier, D
    Tada, E
    FUSION TECHNOLOGY, 1998, 34 (03): : 1144 - 1150
  • [15] Remote handling and maintenance of ITER in-vessel components
    Burgess, T.
    Haange, R.
    Hattori, Y.
    Heckendorn, F.
    Ozaki, F.
    Shibanuma, K.
    Tesini, A.
    Herndon, J.
    Janeschitz, G.
    Martin, E.
    Maisonnier, D.
    Sironi, M.
    Tada, E.
    Fusion Technology, 1998, 34 (3 pt 2): : 1144 - 1150
  • [16] Design evolution and integration of the ITER in-vessel components
    Martin, A.
    Calcagno, B.
    Chappuis, Ph.
    Daly, E.
    Dellopoulos, G.
    Furmanek, A.
    Gicquel, S.
    Heitzenroeder, P.
    Chen Jiming
    Kalish, M.
    Kim, D. -H.
    Khomiakov, S.
    Labusov, A.
    Loarte, A.
    Loughlin, M.
    Merola, M.
    Mitteau, R.
    Polunovski, E.
    Raffray, R.
    Sadakov, S.
    Ulrickson, M.
    Zacchia, F.
    Fu, Zhang
    FUSION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2013, 88 (9-10) : 1955 - 1959
  • [17] Development of design Criteria for ITER In-vessel Components
    Sannazzaro, G.
    Barabash, V.
    Kang, S. C.
    Fernandez, E.
    Kalinin, G.
    Obushev, A.
    Martinez, V. J.
    Vazquez, I.
    Fernandez, F.
    Guirao, J.
    FUSION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2013, 88 (9-10) : 2138 - 2141
  • [18] Structural materials joints for ITER in-vessel components
    Le Marois, G
    Burlet, H
    Solomon, R
    Marini, B
    Gentzbittel, JM
    Briottet, L
    FUSION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 1998, 39-40 : 253 - 261
  • [19] DESIGN STANDARD ISSUES FOR ITER IN-VESSEL COMPONENTS
    MAJUMDAR, S
    FUSION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 1995, 29 : 158 - 163
  • [20] AN OVERVIEW OF THE ITER IN-VESSEL COIL SYSTEMS
    Heitzenroeder, P. J.
    Brooks, A. W.
    Chrzanowski, J. H.
    Dahlgren, F.
    Hawryluk, R. J.
    Loesser, G. D.
    Neumeyer, C.
    Mansfield, C.
    Cordier, J. J.
    Campbell, D.
    Johnson, G. A.
    Martin, A.
    Rebut, P. H.
    Tao, J. O.
    Smith, J. P.
    Schaffer, M.
    Humphreys, D.
    Fogarty, P. J.
    Nelson, B. E.
    REED, R. P.
    2009 23RD IEEE/NPSS SYMPOSIUM ON FUSION ENGINEERING, 2009, : 643 - +