The magnitude and challenge of false-positive newborn screening test results

被引:113
|
作者
Kwon, C [1 ]
Farrel, PM [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Madison, WI 53706 USA
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1001/archpedi.154.7.714
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Objectives: This study examined for the first time to our knowledge the national data available from newborn screening programs in the United States and determined the salient characteristics of various screening tests for 3 hereditary metabolic disorders and 2 congenital endocrinopathies with emphasis on positive predictive values (PPVs) to delineate the magnitude of false-positive results. Methods: Reports published by the Council of Regional Networks for Genetic Services for 1990 through 1994 were examined carefully, paying particular attention to phenylketonuria, galactosemia, biotinidase deficiency, congenital hypothyroidism, and congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH). Because of recent improvements in data collecting, reporting, and tabulating, we used data from 1993 and 1994 to determine the apparent sensitivity, specificity, relative incidence rates, and PPVs for the 5 disorders. For biotinidase deficiency and CAH, we also calculated relative incidence rates and PPVs for 1991 and 1992. Results: Our analyses revealed the following best estimates for the relative incidence rates of 5 disorders: phenylketonuria, 1:14000; galactosemia, 1:59000; biotinidase deficiency, 1:80000; congenital hypothyroidism, 1:3300; and CAH, 1:20000. An apparent sensitivity of 100% has been reported by the various states for most of the disorders, and specificity levels are all above 99%. The PPVs, however, range from 0.5% to 6.0%. Consequently, on average, there are more than 50 false-positive results for every true-positive result identified through newborn screening in the United States. Conclusions: The magnitude of false-positive results generated in newborn screening programs, particularly for congenital endocrinopathies, presents a great challenge for future improvement of this important public health program. Attention must be given to improved laboratory tests, use of more specific markers, and better risk communication for families of patients with false-positive test results.
引用
收藏
页码:714 / 718
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] False-positive results in expanded newborn screening
    Hanley, W. B.
    [J]. PEDIATRICS, 2007, 119 (02) : 414 - 415
  • [2] Parental tolerance of false-positive newborn screening results
    Prosser, Lisa A.
    Ladapo, Joseph A.
    Rusinak, Donna
    Waisbren, Susan E.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PEDIATRICS & ADOLESCENT MEDICINE, 2008, 162 (09): : 870 - 876
  • [3] False-positive results in expanded newborn screening - In reply.
    Tarini, Beth A.
    Christakis, Dimitri A.
    Welch, H. Gilbert
    [J]. PEDIATRICS, 2007, 119 (02) : 415 - 415
  • [4] Psychosocial Impact of False-Positive Newborn Screening Results: A Scoping Review
    Chudleigh, Jane
    Holder, Pru
    [J]. CHILDREN-BASEL, 2024, 11 (05):
  • [5] Psychological Effects of False-Positive Results in Expanded Newborn Screening in China
    Tu, Wen-Jun
    He, Jian
    Chen, Hui
    Shi, Xiao-Dong
    Li, Ying
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (04):
  • [6] The impact of false-positive newborn screening results on families: a qualitative study
    Schmidt, Johanna L.
    Castellanos-Brown, Karen
    Childress, Saltanat
    Bonhomme, Natasha
    Oktay, Julianne S.
    Terry, Sharon F.
    Kyler, Penny
    Davidoff, Amy
    Greene, Carol
    [J]. GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2012, 14 (01) : 76 - 80
  • [7] Parent Experience With False-Positive Newborn Screening Results for Cystic Fibrosis
    Hayeems, Robin Z.
    Miller, Fiona A.
    Barg, Carolyn J.
    Bombard, Yvonne
    Kerr, Elizabeth
    Tam, Karen
    Carroll, June C.
    Potter, Beth K.
    Chakraborty, Pranesh
    Davies, Christine
    Milburn, Jennifer
    Patton, Sarah
    Bytautas, Jessica P.
    Taylor, Louise
    Price, April
    Gonska, Tanja
    Keenan, Katherine
    Ratjen, Felix
    Guttmann, Astrid
    [J]. PEDIATRICS, 2016, 138 (03)
  • [8] Reducing False-Positive Results in Newborn Screening Using Machine Learning
    Peng, Gang
    Tang, Yishuo
    Cowan, Tina M.
    Enns, Gregory M.
    Zhao, Hongyu
    Scharfe, Curt
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEONATAL SCREENING, 2020, 6 (01)
  • [9] The dangers of false-positive and false-negative test results: False-positive results as a function
    Jackson, Brian R.
    [J]. CLINICS IN LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2008, 28 (02) : 305 - +
  • [10] Are the Harms of False-Positive Screening Test Results Minimal or Meaningful?
    Kroenke, Kurt
    [J]. JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2014, 174 (06) : 961 - 963