The impact of false-positive newborn screening results on families: a qualitative study

被引:67
|
作者
Schmidt, Johanna L. [2 ,3 ]
Castellanos-Brown, Karen [4 ]
Childress, Saltanat [5 ]
Bonhomme, Natasha [6 ]
Oktay, Julianne S. [5 ]
Terry, Sharon F. [6 ]
Kyler, Penny [7 ]
Davidoff, Amy [8 ]
Greene, Carol [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Div Human Genet, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[2] Childrens Natl Med Ctr, Dept Neurol, Washington, DC 20010 USA
[3] Childrens Natl Med Ctr, Med Genet Res Ctr, Washington, DC 20010 USA
[4] USDA, Alexandria, VA USA
[5] Univ Maryland, Sch Social Work, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[6] Genet Alliance, Washington, DC USA
[7] US Hlth Resources & Serv Adm, US Dept HHS, Maternal & Child Hlth Bur, Rockville, MD 20857 USA
[8] Univ Maryland, Sch Pharm, Dept Pharmaceut Hlth Serv Res, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
关键词
communication; false-positive; newborn screening; parental stress; qualitative; TANDEM MASS-SPECTROMETRY; COMMUNICATION; DISORDERS; PARENTS; TESTS;
D O I
10.1038/gim.2011.5
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Purpose: Newborn screening leads to improved treatment and disease outcomes, but false-positive newborn screening results may cause distress for parents. The purpose of this study was to describe the experiences of families who receive a false-positive newborn screening result in an attempt to discover ways to help improve the newborn screening communication process for families. Methods: This was a qualitative study using two methods of data collection: in-depth, semistructured interviews and focus groups. Participants (N = 27) were parents whose children (ages 6-16 months) underwent follow-up testing after newborn screening and whose follow-up test results indicated that the newborn screening result was a false-positive. Results: Our analysis found that parents who have a false-positive newborn screening result experience five distinct stages. Most parents did not report long-term negative impacts of the experience, but some experienced some residual worry. Participants described effective provider communication as key in mitigating stress. Some parents identified the experience as leading to positive outcomes. Conclusion: Identifying best practices for communication between the health care providers and parents is an essential component in improving the newborn screening process. Further research is needed to discover best practices for communication to minimize potential harm and maximize the benefits of newborn screening.
引用
收藏
页码:76 / 80
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] False-positive results in expanded newborn screening
    Hanley, W. B.
    [J]. PEDIATRICS, 2007, 119 (02) : 414 - 415
  • [2] Psychosocial Impact of False-Positive Newborn Screening Results: A Scoping Review
    Chudleigh, Jane
    Holder, Pru
    [J]. CHILDREN-BASEL, 2024, 11 (05):
  • [3] Parental tolerance of false-positive newborn screening results
    Prosser, Lisa A.
    Ladapo, Joseph A.
    Rusinak, Donna
    Waisbren, Susan E.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PEDIATRICS & ADOLESCENT MEDICINE, 2008, 162 (09): : 870 - 876
  • [4] False-positive results in expanded newborn screening - In reply.
    Tarini, Beth A.
    Christakis, Dimitri A.
    Welch, H. Gilbert
    [J]. PEDIATRICS, 2007, 119 (02) : 415 - 415
  • [5] The magnitude and challenge of false-positive newborn screening test results
    Kwon, C
    Farrel, PM
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PEDIATRICS & ADOLESCENT MEDICINE, 2000, 154 (07): : 714 - 718
  • [6] Impact of false-positive newborn metabolic screening results on early health care utilization
    Lipstein, Ellen A.
    Perrin, James M.
    Waisbren, Susan E.
    Prosser, Lisa A.
    [J]. GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2009, 11 (10) : 716 - 721
  • [7] Psychological Effects of False-Positive Results in Expanded Newborn Screening in China
    Tu, Wen-Jun
    He, Jian
    Chen, Hui
    Shi, Xiao-Dong
    Li, Ying
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (04):
  • [8] Parent Experience With False-Positive Newborn Screening Results for Cystic Fibrosis
    Hayeems, Robin Z.
    Miller, Fiona A.
    Barg, Carolyn J.
    Bombard, Yvonne
    Kerr, Elizabeth
    Tam, Karen
    Carroll, June C.
    Potter, Beth K.
    Chakraborty, Pranesh
    Davies, Christine
    Milburn, Jennifer
    Patton, Sarah
    Bytautas, Jessica P.
    Taylor, Louise
    Price, April
    Gonska, Tanja
    Keenan, Katherine
    Ratjen, Felix
    Guttmann, Astrid
    [J]. PEDIATRICS, 2016, 138 (03)
  • [9] Reducing False-Positive Results in Newborn Screening Using Machine Learning
    Peng, Gang
    Tang, Yishuo
    Cowan, Tina M.
    Enns, Gregory M.
    Zhao, Hongyu
    Scharfe, Curt
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEONATAL SCREENING, 2020, 6 (01)
  • [10] THE IMPACT OF PREMATURITY ON FALSE POSITIVE NEWBORN SCREENING RESULTS
    Nandam, S.
    Hillman, P.
    Findley, T. O.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2021, 69 (02) : 602 - 603