HYDROGEN COMBUSTION MODELLING IN LARGE-SCALE GEOMETRIES

被引:0
|
作者
Studer, E. [1 ]
Beccantini, A. [1 ]
Kudriakov, S. [1 ]
Velikorodny, A. [2 ]
机构
[1] CEA, DEN, DM2S STMF, F-91191 Gif Sur Yvette, France
[2] AUSY, F-92445 Issy Les Moulineaux, France
关键词
SIMULATION; CODE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
Hydrogen risk mitigation issues based on catalytic recombiners cannot exclude flammable clouds to be formed during the course of a severe accident in a Nuclear Power Plant. Consequences of combustion processes have to be assessed based on existing knowledge and state of the art in CFD combustion modelling. The Fukushima accidents have also revealed the need for taking into account the hydrogen explosion phenomena in risk management. Thus combustion modelling in a large-scale geometry is one of the remaining severe accident safety issues. At present day there doesn't exist a combustion model which can accurately describe a combustion process inside a geometrical configuration typical of the Nuclear Power Plant (NPP) environment. Therefore the major attention in model development has to be paid on the adoption of existing approaches or creation of the new ones capable of reliably predicting the possibility of the flame acceleration in the geometries of that type. A set of experiments performed previously in RUT facility and Heiss Dampf Reactor (HDR) facility is used as a validation database for development of three-dimensional gas dynamic model for the simulation of hydrogen-air-steam combustion in large-scale geometries. The combustion regimes include slow deflagration, fast deflagration, and detonation. Modelling is based on Reactive Discrete Equation Method (RDEM) where flame is represented as an interface separating reactants and combustion products. The transport of the progress variable is governed by different flame surface wrinkling factors. The results of numerical simulation are presented together with the comparisons, critical discussions and conclusions.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Simulation of Hydrogen Combustion Experiment in Large-Scale Experimental Facility with ANSYS Fluent CFD Code
    Holler, Tadej
    Kljenak, Ivo
    Komen, Ed M. J.
    [J]. 24TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE NUCLEAR ENERGY FOR NEW EUROPE, (NENE 2015), 2015,
  • [32] Disinformative data in large-scale hydrological modelling
    Kauffeldt, A.
    Halldin, S.
    Rodhe, A.
    Xu, C. -Y.
    Westerberg, I. K.
    [J]. HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2013, 17 (07) : 2845 - 2857
  • [33] Modelling the attraction of travel to shopping destinations in large-scale modelling
    Kristoffersson, Ida
    Daly, Andrew
    Algers, Staffan
    [J]. TRANSPORT POLICY, 2018, 68 : 52 - 62
  • [34] Editorial: large-scale computations in environmental modelling
    Zlatev, Zahari
    Ebel, Adolf
    Georgiev, Krassimir
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENT AND POLLUTION, 2008, 32 (02) : 135 - 138
  • [35] Modelling of large-scale microwave plasma sources
    Ferreira, C. M.
    Tatarova, E.
    Henriques, J.
    Dias, F. M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSICS D-APPLIED PHYSICS, 2009, 42 (19)
  • [36] Directions in modelling large-scale software architectures
    Grundy, J
    Hosking, J
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE METHODS AND TOOLS, PROCEEDING, 2000, : 31 - 40
  • [37] Conceptual modelling for designing large-scale simulations
    Balci, O.
    Ormsby, W. F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SIMULATION, 2007, 1 (03) : 175 - 186
  • [38] Modelling Large-Scale CSMA Wireless Networks
    Voicu, Andra M.
    SimiC, Ljiljana
    Petrova, Marina
    [J]. 2021 IEEE WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS AND NETWORKING CONFERENCE (WCNC), 2021,
  • [39] Modelling Large-Scale Scientific Data Transfers
    Bogado J.
    Lassnig M.
    Monticelli F.
    Díaz J.
    [J]. Computing and Software for Big Science, 2022, 6 (1)
  • [40] Hydrogen bond interaction geometries in protein-ligand complexes: From large-scale statistics to single cases
    Nittinger, Eva
    Inhester, Therese
    Lange, Gudrun
    Klein, Robert
    Rarey, Matthias
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2017, 253