The role of splenic angioembolization as an adjunct to nonoperative management of blunt splenic injuries: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:68
|
作者
Crichton, James Charles Ian [1 ]
Naidoo, Kamil [2 ,3 ]
Yet, Barbaros [2 ,3 ]
Brundage, Susan I. [2 ,3 ]
Perkins, Zane [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Waikato Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Hamilton, New Zealand
[2] Queen Mary Univ London, Barts, England
[3] London Sch Med & Dent, London, England
来源
关键词
Spleen; angioembolization; nonoperative management; blunt trauma; ARTERY EMBOLIZATION; NONSURGICAL MANAGEMENT; AMERICAN ASSOCIATION; SUCCESS RATE; TRAUMA; OUTCOMES; SURGERY; COMPLICATIONS; IMPACT; BLUSH;
D O I
10.1097/TA.0000000000001649
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Nonoperative management (NOM) of hemodynamically normal patients with blunt splenic injury (BSI) is the standard of care. Guidelines recommend additional splenic angioembolization (SAE) in patients with American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) Grade IV and Grade V BSI, but the role of SAE in Grade III injuries is unclear and controversial. The aim of this systematic review was to compare the safety and effectiveness of SAE as an adjunct to NOM versus NOM alone in adults with BSI. METHODS: A systematic literature search (Medline, Embase, and CINAHL) was performed to identify original studies that compared outcomes in adult BSI patients treated with SAE or NOM alone. Primary outcome was failure of NOM. Secondary outcomes included morbidity, mortality, hospital length of stay, and transfusion requirements. Bayesian meta-analyses were used to calculate an absolute (risk difference) and relative (risk ratio [RR]) measure of treatment effect for each outcome. RESULTS: Twenty-three studies (6,684 patients) were included. For Grades I to V combined, there was no difference in NOM failure rate (SAE, 8.6% vs NOM, 7.7%; RR, 1.09 [0.80-1.51]; p = 0.28), mortality (SAE, 4.8% vs NOM, 5.8%; RR, 0.82 [0.45-1.31]; p = 0.81), hospital length of stay (11.3 vs 9.5 days; p = 0.06), or blood transfusion requirements (1.8 vs 1.7 units; p = 0.47) between patients treated with SAE and those treated with NOM alone. However, morbidity was significantly higher in patients treated with SAE (SAE, 38.1% vs NOM, 18.6%; RR, 1.83 [1.20-2.66]; p < 0.01). When stratified by grade of splenic injury, SAE significantly reduced the failure rate of NOM in patients with Grade IV and Grade V splenic injuries but had minimal effect in those with Grade I to Grade III injuries. CONCLUSION: Splenic angioembolization should be strongly considered as an adjunct to NOM in patients with AAST Grade IV and Grade V BSI but should not be routinely recommended in patients with AAST Grade I to Grade III injuries. Copyright (C) 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:934 / 943
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Maintaining Low Transfusion and Angioembolization Rates in the Age of Nonoperative Management of Pediatric Blunt Splenic Injury
    Duron, Vincent P.
    Day, Kristopher M.
    Steigman, Shaun A.
    Aidlen, Jeremy T.
    Luks, Francois I.
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2014, 80 (11) : 1159 - 1163
  • [22] Angioembolization significantly improves vascular injuries in blunt splenic trauma
    Lauerman, Margaret H.
    Brenner, Megan
    Simpson, Nana
    Shanmuganathan, Kathirkamanathan
    Stein, Deborah M.
    Scalea, Thomas
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND EMERGENCY SURGERY, 2021, 47 (01) : 99 - 103
  • [23] Angioembolization significantly improves vascular injuries in blunt splenic trauma
    Margaret H. Lauerman
    Megan Brenner
    Nana Simpson
    Kathirkamanathan Shanmuganathan
    Deborah M. Stein
    Thomas Scalea
    European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, 2021, 47 : 99 - 103
  • [24] The impacts of different embolization techniques on splenic artery embolization for blunt splenic injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Rong, Jing-Jing
    Liu, Dan
    Liang, Ming
    Wang, Qing-Hua
    Sun, Jing-Yang
    Zhang, Quan-Yu
    Peng, Cheng-Fei
    Xuan, Feng-Qi
    Zhao, Li-Jun
    Tian, Xiao-Xiang
    Han, Ya-Ling
    MILITARY MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2017, 4
  • [25] The impacts of different embolization techniques on splenic artery embolization for blunt splenic injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jing-Jing Rong
    Dan Liu
    Ming Liang
    Qing-Hua Wang
    Jing-Yang Sun
    Quan-Yu Zhang
    Cheng-Fei Peng
    Feng-Qi Xuan
    Li-Jun Zhao
    Xiao-Xiang Tian
    Ya-Ling Han
    Military Medical Research, 2018, (01) : 41 - 52
  • [26] The impacts of different embolization techniques on splenic artery embolization for blunt splenic injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jing-Jing Rong
    Dan Liu
    Ming Liang
    Qing-Hua Wang
    Jing-Yang Sun
    Quan-Yu Zhang
    Cheng-Fei Peng
    Feng-Qi Xuan
    Li-Jun Zhao
    Xiao-Xiang Tian
    Ya-Ling Han
    Military Medical Research, 4
  • [27] Prognostic factors for failure of nonoperative management in adults with blunt splenic injury: A systematic review
    Olthof, Dominique C.
    Joosse, Pieter
    van der Vlies, Cornelis H.
    de Haan, Rob J.
    Goslings, J. Carel
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY, 2013, 74 (02): : 546 - 557
  • [28] Proximal Splenic Angioembolization Does Not Improve Outcomes in Treating Blunt Splenic Injuries Compared With Splenectomy: A Cohort Analysis
    Duchesne, Juan C.
    Simmons, Jon D.
    Schmieg, Robert E.
    McSwttin, Norman E.
    Bellows, Charles F.
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2008, 65 (06): : 1346 - 1351
  • [29] Nonoperative management of blunt and penetrating splenic traumas
    Kapan, Selin
    Turhan, Ahmet Nuray
    Alis, Halil
    Demiriz, Baris
    Dodur, Berrin
    Hatipoglu, Sinan
    Aygun, Ersan
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF BAKIRKOY, 2005, 1 (03) : 99 - 101
  • [30] NONOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT OF BLUNT SPLENIC TRAUMA IN ADULTS
    MALANGONI, MA
    LEVINE, AW
    APRAHAMIAN, C
    CONDON, RE
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1983, 23 (07): : 649 - 649