The role of splenic angioembolization as an adjunct to nonoperative management of blunt splenic injuries: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:68
|
作者
Crichton, James Charles Ian [1 ]
Naidoo, Kamil [2 ,3 ]
Yet, Barbaros [2 ,3 ]
Brundage, Susan I. [2 ,3 ]
Perkins, Zane [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Waikato Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Hamilton, New Zealand
[2] Queen Mary Univ London, Barts, England
[3] London Sch Med & Dent, London, England
来源
关键词
Spleen; angioembolization; nonoperative management; blunt trauma; ARTERY EMBOLIZATION; NONSURGICAL MANAGEMENT; AMERICAN ASSOCIATION; SUCCESS RATE; TRAUMA; OUTCOMES; SURGERY; COMPLICATIONS; IMPACT; BLUSH;
D O I
10.1097/TA.0000000000001649
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Nonoperative management (NOM) of hemodynamically normal patients with blunt splenic injury (BSI) is the standard of care. Guidelines recommend additional splenic angioembolization (SAE) in patients with American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) Grade IV and Grade V BSI, but the role of SAE in Grade III injuries is unclear and controversial. The aim of this systematic review was to compare the safety and effectiveness of SAE as an adjunct to NOM versus NOM alone in adults with BSI. METHODS: A systematic literature search (Medline, Embase, and CINAHL) was performed to identify original studies that compared outcomes in adult BSI patients treated with SAE or NOM alone. Primary outcome was failure of NOM. Secondary outcomes included morbidity, mortality, hospital length of stay, and transfusion requirements. Bayesian meta-analyses were used to calculate an absolute (risk difference) and relative (risk ratio [RR]) measure of treatment effect for each outcome. RESULTS: Twenty-three studies (6,684 patients) were included. For Grades I to V combined, there was no difference in NOM failure rate (SAE, 8.6% vs NOM, 7.7%; RR, 1.09 [0.80-1.51]; p = 0.28), mortality (SAE, 4.8% vs NOM, 5.8%; RR, 0.82 [0.45-1.31]; p = 0.81), hospital length of stay (11.3 vs 9.5 days; p = 0.06), or blood transfusion requirements (1.8 vs 1.7 units; p = 0.47) between patients treated with SAE and those treated with NOM alone. However, morbidity was significantly higher in patients treated with SAE (SAE, 38.1% vs NOM, 18.6%; RR, 1.83 [1.20-2.66]; p < 0.01). When stratified by grade of splenic injury, SAE significantly reduced the failure rate of NOM in patients with Grade IV and Grade V splenic injuries but had minimal effect in those with Grade I to Grade III injuries. CONCLUSION: Splenic angioembolization should be strongly considered as an adjunct to NOM in patients with AAST Grade IV and Grade V BSI but should not be routinely recommended in patients with AAST Grade I to Grade III injuries. Copyright (C) 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:934 / 943
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Nonoperative management of splenic injuries: Improved results with angioembolization
    Gaarder, Christine
    Dormagen, Johann Baptist
    Eken, Torsten
    Skaga, Nils Oddvar
    Klow, Nils Einar
    Pillgram-Larsen, Johan
    Buanes, Trond
    Naess, Paal Aksel
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2006, 61 (01): : 192 - 198
  • [2] Nonoperative Management of Adult Blunt Splenic Injury With and Without Splenic Artery Embolotherapy: A Meta-Analysis
    Requarth, Jay A.
    D'Agostino, Ralph B., Jr.
    Miller, Preston R.
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2011, 71 (04): : 898 - 903
  • [3] MAIN CONTROVERSIES IN THE NONOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT OF BLUNT SPLENIC INJURIES
    Marcante Carlotto, Jorge Roberto
    Lopes-Filho, Gaspar de Jesus
    Colleoni-Neto, Ramiro
    ABCD-ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE CIRURGIA DIGESTIVA-BRAZILIAN ARCHIVES OF DIGESTIVE SURGERY, 2016, 29 (01): : 60 - 64
  • [4] Early selective angioembolization improves success of nonoperative management of blunt splenic injury
    Wu, Shih-Chi
    Chow, Kuan-Chih
    Lee, Kun-Hua
    Tung, Cheng-Cheng
    Yang, Albert D.
    Lo, Chong-Jeh
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2007, 73 (09) : 897 - 902
  • [5] Nonoperative Management of Adult Blunt Splenic Injury With and Without Splenic Artery Embolotherapy: A Meta-Analysis EDITORIAL COMMENT
    Davis, Kimberly A.
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2011, 71 (04): : 903 - 903
  • [6] Splenic Artery Angioembolisation As An Adjunct To Observation For Non-Operative Management Of Haemodynamically Stable Patients With Blunt Splenic Injury - A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis
    Keady, C.
    Ryan, E. J.
    Davey, M. G.
    Joyce, M.
    Kerin, M.
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 189 (SUPPL 5) : S112 - S112
  • [7] The role of angioembolization in the management of blunt renal injuries: a systematic review
    Giovanni Liguori
    Giacomo Rebez
    Alessandro Larcher
    Michele Rizzo
    Tommaso Cai
    Carlo Trombetta
    Andrea Salonia
    BMC Urology, 21
  • [8] Improved success in nonoperative management of blunt splenic injuries: Embolization of splenic artery pseudoaneurysms
    Davis, KA
    Fabian, TC
    Croce, MA
    Gavant, ML
    Flick, PA
    Minard, G
    Kudsk, KA
    Pritchard, FE
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1998, 44 (06): : 1008 - 1013
  • [9] The role of angioembolization in the management of blunt renal injuries: a systematic review
    Liguori, Giovanni
    Rebez, Giacomo
    Larcher, Alessandro
    Rizzo, Michele
    Cai, Tommaso
    Trombetta, Carlo
    Salonia, Andrea
    BMC UROLOGY, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [10] Factors of Failure for Nonoperative Management of Blunt Liver and Splenic Injuries
    M. Gage Ochsner, M.D.
    World Journal of Surgery, 2001, 25 : 1393 - 1396