Inequality reducing properties of progressive income tax schedules: The case of endogenous income

被引:5
|
作者
Carbonell-Nicolau, Oriol [1 ]
Llavador, Humberto [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers State Univ, Dept Econ, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA
[2] Univ Pompeu Fabra, Dept Econ, Barcelona, Spain
[3] Barcelona GSE, Barcelona, Spain
来源
THEORETICAL ECONOMICS | 2018年 / 13卷 / 01期
关键词
Progressive taxation; income inequality; incentive effects of taxation; EQUAL SACRIFICE; LORENTZ CURVES; TAXATION; PRINCIPLE; TRANSFORMATIONS;
D O I
10.3982/TE2533
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The case for progressive income taxation is often based on the classic result of Jakobsson, 1976 and Fellman, 1976, according to which progressive and only progressive income taxesin the sense of increasing average tax rates on incomeensure a reduction in income inequality. This result has been criticized on the grounds that it ignores the possible disincentive effect of taxation on work effort, and the resolution of this critique has been a longstanding problem in public finance. This paper provides a normative rationale for progressivity that takes into account the effect of an income tax on labor supply. It shows that a tax schedule is inequality reducing only if it is progressivein the sense of increasing marginal tax rates on incomeand identifies a necessary and sufficient condition on primitives under which progressive and only progressive taxes are inequality reducing.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 60
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Tax progressivity and income inequality in the US
    Jalles, Joao Tovar
    Karras, Georgios
    [J]. ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2024, 238
  • [22] Tax Havens and Global Income Inequality
    Yildiz, Abdunnur
    Demir, Murat
    [J]. MALIYE DERGISI, 2019, (176): : 329 - 354
  • [23] Progressive Taxation, Income Inequality, and Happiness
    Oishi, Shigehiro
    Kushlev, Kostadin
    Schimmack, Ulrich
    [J]. AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2018, 73 (02) : 157 - 168
  • [24] Income tax on individuals and income inequality in Ecuador between 2007 and 2011
    Cano, Liliana
    [J]. CEPAL REVIEW, 2017, (123): : 59 - 82
  • [25] INCOME INEQUALITY AND THE DEFINITION OF INCOME - THE CASE OF MALAYSIA
    KUSNIC, M
    DAVANZO, J
    [J]. POPULATION INDEX, 1980, 46 (03) : 426 - 426
  • [26] NON-EQUIPROPORTIONATE INCOME GROWTH, INEQUALITY, AND THE INCOME-TAX
    LAMBERT, PJ
    [J]. PUBLIC FINANCE-FINANCES PUBLIQUES, 1984, 39 (01): : 104 - 118
  • [27] PROGRESSIVE INCOME-TAX WITH A UNIFORM TAX RATE
    SOULE, DM
    BATES, CT
    [J]. NEBRASKA JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS, 1976, 15 (02): : 19 - 32
  • [28] FISCAL POLICY AS AN INSTRUMENT FOR REDUCING INCOME INEQUALITY: CASE OF LATVIA
    Vitols, Edgars
    Jekabsone, Sandra
    [J]. NEW CHALLENGES IN ECONOMIC AND BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT - 2020: ECONOMIC INEQUALITY AND WELL-BEING, 2020, : 526 - 534
  • [29] Cognitive Barriers to Reducing Income Inequality
    Jackson, Joshua Conrad
    Payne, Keith
    [J]. SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PERSONALITY SCIENCE, 2021, 12 (05) : 687 - 696
  • [30] Income tax reform for a globalized world: The case for a dual income tax
    Boadway, Robin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ASIAN ECONOMICS, 2005, 16 (06) : 910 - 927