Fan-beam densitometry of the growing skeleton

被引:20
|
作者
Cole, JH
Scerpella, TA
van der Meulen, MCH
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Sibley Sch Mech & Aerosp Engn, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
[2] Upstate Med Univ, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Syracuse, NY USA
[3] Hosp Special Surg, Lab Biomed Mech & Mat, New York, NY 10021 USA
关键词
bone densitometry; fan-beam magnification; pediatric bone accrual; growth and development; clinical trial;
D O I
10.1385/JCD:8:1:057
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Magnification error in fan-beam densitometers varies with distance from the X-ray source to the bone measured and might obscure bone mineral changes in the growing skeleton. Magnification was examined by scanning aluminum rods of different shapes (square, rectangular, solid round, and hollow round) at four distances above the Xray source in two orientations, with rods aligned parallel (SI) and perpendicular (ML) to the longitudinal axis of the scanning table. Measured area (cm(2)) decreased linearly with distance above the X-ray source for all rods in the SI orientation (p < 0.005). Measured mineral content.(g) decreased linearly with distance but only for SI round rods (p < 0.0001) and for ML hollow round rods (p < 0.005). Area and mineral content decreased 1.6-1.8% per centimeter above the source for round rods. Measured mineral density (g/cm(2)) decreased linearly with distance from the source only for ML hollow round rods (p < 0.005). Variation in area, mineral content, and mineral density measurements was 6.6-6.9%, 6.9-7.5%, and 1.9-2.3%, respectively, for SI round rods. Magnification errors of this magnitude are problematic for clinical studies using fan-beam densitometry. Particularly in pediatric subjects, increases in soft tissue during normal growth could increase a bone's distance from the fan-beam source and result in apparent reductions in area and bone mineral content.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:57 / 64
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Dynamic bowtie for fan-beam CT
    Liu, Fenglin
    Wang, Ge
    Cong, Wenxiang
    Hsieh, Scott S.
    Pelc, Norbert J.
    JOURNAL OF X-RAY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 21 (04) : 579 - 590
  • [22] FIBEROPTIC FAN-BEAM ABSORPTION TOMOGRAPHY
    BEITING, EJ
    APPLIED OPTICS, 1992, 31 (09): : 1328 - 1343
  • [23] Multiresolution reconstruction in fan-beam tomography
    Bonnet, S
    Peyrin, F
    Turjman, F
    Prost, R
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, 2002, 11 (03) : 169 - 176
  • [24] DERIVATION OF THE EXTENDED FAN-BEAM FORMULA
    SMITH, BD
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 1985, 4 (04) : 177 - 184
  • [25] Image reconstruction from truncated fan-beam projections along a circular trajectory using the virtual fan-beam method
    Charles, Mathurin
    Clackdoyle, Rolf
    Rit, Simon
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2023, 68 (24):
  • [26] Motion artifact reduction in fan-beam and cone-beam computed tomography via the Fan-beam Data Consistency Condition (FDCC)
    Leng, Shuai
    Nett, Brian
    Speidel, Michael
    Chen, Guang-Hong
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2007: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, PTS 1-3, 2007, 6510
  • [27] Reconstruction of Edges from Fan-Beam Projections
    Narasimhadhan, A. V.
    Sharma, Aman
    Koolagudi, Shashidhar G.
    Naganjaneyulu, G. V. S. S. K. R.
    Avinash, Sure
    Peddireddy, Vinay
    Kishan, N. Bal
    Rajan, Jeny
    PROCEEDINGS OF TENCON 2018 - 2018 IEEE REGION 10 CONFERENCE, 2018, : 1278 - 1283
  • [28] Optimum directivity coverage of fan-beam antennas
    Runyon, DL
    IEEE ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION MAGAZINE, 2002, 44 (02) : 66 - 70
  • [29] A General Formula for Fan-Beam Lambda Tomography
    Yu, Hengyong
    Wang, Ge
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL IMAGING, 2006, 2006
  • [30] EFFICIENT TENSOR TOMOGRAPHY IN FAN-BEAM COORDINATES
    Monard, Francois
    INVERSE PROBLEMS AND IMAGING, 2016, 10 (02) : 433 - 459