Fan-beam densitometry of the growing skeleton

被引:20
|
作者
Cole, JH
Scerpella, TA
van der Meulen, MCH
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Sibley Sch Mech & Aerosp Engn, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
[2] Upstate Med Univ, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Syracuse, NY USA
[3] Hosp Special Surg, Lab Biomed Mech & Mat, New York, NY 10021 USA
关键词
bone densitometry; fan-beam magnification; pediatric bone accrual; growth and development; clinical trial;
D O I
10.1385/JCD:8:1:057
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Magnification error in fan-beam densitometers varies with distance from the X-ray source to the bone measured and might obscure bone mineral changes in the growing skeleton. Magnification was examined by scanning aluminum rods of different shapes (square, rectangular, solid round, and hollow round) at four distances above the Xray source in two orientations, with rods aligned parallel (SI) and perpendicular (ML) to the longitudinal axis of the scanning table. Measured area (cm(2)) decreased linearly with distance above the X-ray source for all rods in the SI orientation (p < 0.005). Measured mineral content.(g) decreased linearly with distance but only for SI round rods (p < 0.0001) and for ML hollow round rods (p < 0.005). Area and mineral content decreased 1.6-1.8% per centimeter above the source for round rods. Measured mineral density (g/cm(2)) decreased linearly with distance from the source only for ML hollow round rods (p < 0.005). Variation in area, mineral content, and mineral density measurements was 6.6-6.9%, 6.9-7.5%, and 1.9-2.3%, respectively, for SI round rods. Magnification errors of this magnitude are problematic for clinical studies using fan-beam densitometry. Particularly in pediatric subjects, increases in soft tissue during normal growth could increase a bone's distance from the fan-beam source and result in apparent reductions in area and bone mineral content.
引用
收藏
页码:57 / 64
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Correcting Fan-Beam Magnification in Clinical Densitometry Scans of Growing Subjects
    Cole, Jacqueline H.
    Dowthwaite, Jodi N.
    Scerpella, Tamara A.
    van der Meulen, Marjolein C. H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, 2009, 12 (03) : 322 - 329
  • [2] A comparison between pencil and fan-beam bone densitometry scanners in measuring periprosthetic bone
    Higgins, RN
    Pearse, M
    Banks, LM
    [J]. OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2000, 11 : 41 - 41
  • [3] Characterisation of fan-beam collimators
    Deborah Pareto
    Javier Pavía
    Carles Falcón
    Ignacio Juvells
    Albert Cot
    Domènec Ros
    [J]. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 2001, 28 : 144 - 149
  • [4] A simple method of computing hip axis length using fan-beam densitometry and anthropometric measurements
    Young, JT
    Carter, KA
    Marion, MS
    Greendale, GA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, 2000, 3 (04) : 325 - 331
  • [5] FAN-BEAM RECONSTRUCTION METHODS
    HORN, BKP
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE, 1979, 67 (12) : 1616 - 1623
  • [6] Axial and total-body bone densitometry using a narrow-angle fan-beam
    Mazess, RB
    Hanson, JA
    Payne, R
    Nord, R
    Wilson, M
    [J]. OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2000, 11 (02) : 158 - 166
  • [7] ACCURATE FAN-BEAM RECONSTRUCTION
    WEINSTEIN, FS
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE, 1978, 66 (05) : 608 - 609
  • [8] FAN-BEAM GAMMA CAMERA
    KEYES, WI
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1975, 20 (03): : 489 - 491
  • [9] Characterisation of fan-beam collimators
    Pareto, D
    Pavía, J
    Falcón, C
    Juvells, I
    Cot, A
    Ros, D
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2001, 28 (02) : 144 - 149
  • [10] Fan-Beam Array Synthesis
    Chyba, Milan
    Bezousek, Pavel
    Pidanic, Jan
    Schejbal, Vladimir
    [J]. 2013 7TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION (EUCAP), 2013, : 2165 - 2168