Uptake of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) and impact on invasive procedures in a tertiary referral center

被引:17
|
作者
Manegold-Brauer, Gwendolin [1 ,2 ]
Berg, C. [1 ,3 ]
Floeck, A. [1 ]
Rueland, A. [1 ]
Gembruch, U. [1 ]
Geipel, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Sch Bonn, Dept Obstet & Prenatal Med, D-53105 Bonn, Germany
[2] Univ Med Sch Basel, Dept Prenatal Med & Gynecol Ultrasound, Basel, Switzerland
[3] Univ Med Sch Cologne, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Prenatal Med & Gynecol Ultrasound, Cologne, Germany
关键词
NIPT; NIPD; Cell-free fetal DNA; Fetal aneuploidies; Prenatal counseling; Non-invasive prenatal testing; Trisomy; 21; CELL-FREE DNA; FETAL DNA; ANEUPLOIDY; TRISOMY-21; DIAGNOSIS; WOMEN; POSITION; SOCIETY; RATES; CARE;
D O I
10.1007/s00404-015-3674-5
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
The introduction of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) by isolation of cell-free fetal DNA from maternal blood is a new diagnostic option in prenatal care. The aim of the study was to investigate the algorithm of prenatal testing before and after the introduction of NIPT in a tertiary referral center and to investigate the influence of NIPT on the frequency of invasive procedures. Retrospective data analysis was conducted of all singleton pregnancies that presented for first trimester screening 17 months before and after the introduction of NIPT (n = 2271). Women were categorized into three risk groups: low risk for trisomy 21 (< 1:1000), intermediate risk (1:101-1:1000) and high risk (a parts per thousand yen1:100). The choice of diagnostic testing after FTS was analyzed. 1093 (group 1) presented before and 1178 (group 2) after the introduction of NIPT. The rate of high-risk patients was equal in both groups (14.4 vs. 15.4 %). No differences were found with regard to invasive testing (11.6 vs. 11.3 %). NIPT was chosen by 3.7 % (44/1178) in group 2. Of those with NIPT, 72.7 % had a risk estimate of < 1:100, but 90.9 % were a parts per thousand yen35 years old. The rate of NIPT among high-risk patients with a normal ultrasound examination was 25 %. At present, NIPT is chosen mainly for reassurance by patients not considered to be at high risk. In the high-risk group, NIPT can be offered if the ultrasound examination is normal and the risk is high due to maternal age or serum screening alone. The rate of invasive testing was not reduced in this selected population.
引用
收藏
页码:543 / 548
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT): Reliability, Challenges, and Future Directions
    Jayashankar, Siva Shantini
    Nasaruddin, Muhammad Luqman
    Hassan, Muhammad Faiz
    Dasrilsyah, Rima Anggrena
    Shafiee, Mohamad Nasir
    Ismail, Noor Akmal Shareela
    Alias, Ekram
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2023, 13 (15)
  • [22] Experience after 3 years of NIPT (Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing)
    Graf, J.
    Benet-Pages, A.
    Mehnert, K.
    Ovens-Raeder, A.
    Schlueter, G.
    Abicht, A.
    Holinski-Feder, E.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2019, 27 : 1817 - 1817
  • [23] Quality assurance and standardization in view of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT)
    Schenk, Peter W.
    LABORATORIUMSMEDIZIN-JOURNAL OF LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2016, 40 (05): : 307 - 312
  • [24] Chromosomal microarray coupled to genome-wide non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) to minimize the number of unnecessary invasive procedures
    Oneda, B.
    Sirleto, P.
    Baldinger, R.
    Taralczak, M.
    Joset, P.
    Zweier, M.
    Niedrist, D.
    Azzarello-Burri, S.
    Steindl, K.
    Rauch, A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2019, 27 : 22 - 23
  • [25] Extending non-invasive prenatal testing to non-invasive prenatal diagnosis
    Horton, Rachel Helen
    Wellesley, Diana Gay
    ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD-FETAL AND NEONATAL EDITION, 2019, 104 (01): : F6 - F7
  • [26] Uptake of non-invasive prenatal testing by Japanese women
    Akaishi, R.
    Yamada, T.
    Kawaguchi, S.
    Kojima, T.
    Koyama, T.
    Umazume, T.
    Morikawa, M.
    Cho, K.
    Minakami, H.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 45 (01) : 113 - 114
  • [27] Evaluation of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for aneuploidy in an NHS setting: a reliable accurate prenatal non-invasive diagnosis (RAPID) protocol
    Melissa Hill
    David Wright
    Rebecca Daley
    Celine Lewis
    Fiona McKay
    Sarah Mason
    Nicholas Lench
    Abigail Howarth
    Christopher Boustred
    Kitty Lo
    Vincent Plagnol
    Kevin Spencer
    Jane Fisher
    Mark Kroese
    Stephen Morris
    Lyn S Chitty
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 14
  • [28] Evaluation of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for aneuploidy in an NHS setting: a reliable accurate prenatal non-invasive diagnosis (RAPID) protocol
    Hill, Melissa
    Wright, David
    Daley, Rebecca
    Lewis, Celine
    Mckay, Fiona
    Mason, Sarah
    Lench, Nicholas
    Howarth, Abigail
    Boustred, Christopher
    Lo, Kitty
    Plagnol, Vincent
    Spencer, Kevin
    Fisher, Jane
    Kroese, Mark
    Morris, Stephen
    Chitty, Lyn S.
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2014, 14
  • [29] Termination of Pregnancy After Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT): Ethical Considerations
    Shakespeare, Tom
    Hull, Richard
    JOURNAL OF PRACTICAL ETHICS, 2018, 6 (02): : 32 - 54
  • [30] Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in Bizkaia: a 10-year experience
    Huerta, Iratxe
    Telez, Mertxe
    Muga, Javier
    Bordas, Jaime
    Torres, Yaima
    Suela, Javier
    Garcia-Barcina, Maria
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2024, 32 : 105 - 105