Evidence for distinct steps in response preparation from a delayed response paradigm

被引:6
|
作者
Shin, Yun Kyoung [1 ]
Proctor, Robert W. [2 ]
机构
[1] Ulsan Natl Inst Sci & Technol, Ulsan, South Korea
[2] Purdue Univ, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
关键词
Delayed response task; Motor specification; Precuing; Response preparation; SIMPLE REACTION-TIME; MOTOR PREPARATION; MOVEMENTS; SPECIFICATION; INFORMATION; PERFORMANCE; INITIATION; EXECUTION; SELECTION; DIRECTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.08.010
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Task parameters still affect reaction times even when all necessary information for executing an action is presented prior to a Go signal to execute the action. Hypotheses in terms of short-term memory capacity, residual activation, and a separate motor-programming stage have been suggested to explain what can and cannot be prepared prior to a delayed Go signal. To test these hypotheses, we used a delayed response task, in which participants were to initiate a movement at onset of an imperative Go signal following the target stimulus. Across Experiments 1-3 we varied task properties including stimulus type, information uncertainty and response complexity, respectively, while controlling other factors. We also varied the time available to process the response by randomly varying the interval between onset of the target and the Go signal (i.e., the stimulus onset asynchrony, or SOA). If the preparation process is completed before initiation, the examined factor should display a strong interaction with SOA, with its effect disappearing at long SOAs. Our results showed strong, weaker, and no interaction patterns for the three factors, respectively, favoring the separate stage hypothesis, according to which response preparation is separated into steps to arrange kinematic specifications into muscle controllable terms.
引用
收藏
页码:42 / 51
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Evidence from a response choice task reveals a selection bias in the attentional cueing paradigm
    Wilson, Daryl E.
    Pratt, Jay
    ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2007, 126 (03) : 216 - 225
  • [22] Extending the 'host response' paradigm from sepsis to cardiogenic shock: evidence, limitations and opportunities
    Buckel, Marie
    Maclean, Patrick
    Knight, Julian C.
    Lawler, Patrick R.
    Proudfoot, Alastair G.
    CRITICAL CARE, 2023, 27 (01)
  • [23] Do emotional stimuli interfere with response inhibition? Evidence from the stop signal paradigm
    Verbruggen, Frederick
    De Houwer, Jan
    COGNITION & EMOTION, 2007, 21 (02) : 391 - 403
  • [24] Event-related beta desynchronization indicates timing of response selection in a delayed-response paradigm in humans
    Kaiser, J
    Birbaumer, N
    Lutzenberger, W
    NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 2001, 312 (03) : 149 - 152
  • [25] Baby steps - Response
    Prasso, S
    NEW REPUBLIC, 2004, 231 (16) : 5 - 5
  • [26] The delayed response
    Waldenfels, Bernhard
    EIKASIA-REVISTA DE FILOSOFIA, 2023, (115): : 371 - 396
  • [27] 'DELAYED RESPONSE'
    ROSSER, JA
    MICHIGAN QUARTERLY REVIEW, 1994, 33 (02) : 346 - 347
  • [28] Delayed response
    Simons, R
    NEW SCIENTIST, 1998, 158 (2135) : 56 - 56
  • [29] Valence processing bypassing the response selection bottleneck? Evidence from the psychological refractory period paradigm
    Fischer, Rico
    Schubert, Torsten
    EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 55 (03) : 203 - 211
  • [30] Attentional Modulation of Early ERP Components in Response to Faces: Evidence From the Attentional Blink Paradigm
    Darque, Alexandra
    Del Zotto, Marzia
    Khateb, Asaid
    Pegna, Alan J.
    BRAIN TOPOGRAPHY, 2012, 25 (02) : 167 - 181