The role of plants and land management in sequestering soil carbon in temperate arable and grassland ecosystems

被引:162
|
作者
Rees, RM [1 ]
Bingham, IJ
Baddeley, JA
Watson, CA
机构
[1] SAC Edinburgh, Crop & Soil Res, Penicuik EH26 0PH, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] SAC, Aberdeen, Scotland
关键词
carbon sequestration; rhizodeposition; roots; soil respiration; land management; soil organic matter; CO2; rhizosphere; soil management;
D O I
10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.12.020
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
Global climate change and concerns about soil quality have led to a widespread interest in the opportunities that are available to sequester carbon in soils. To achieve a better understanding of the changes in C storage, we need to be able to accurately measure and model inputs and losses of C from soils. This in turn requires a thorough understanding of the biological processes involved and the way in which they are influenced by the soil's physical and chemical environment. The amount of C present in a soil is determined by the difference between C addition and C loss. Because these fluxes are large relative to changes in C storage, net storage can be very difficult to measure, particularly in the short term. Carbon is added to soil from plant and animal materials deposited on the soil surface. It is known that approximately 50% of C assimilated by young plants can be transferred below ground; some is used for root construction and maintenance as well as root respiration; some organic C is lost to the soil through exudation and root turnover. A comparison of eight studies has shown that the input to the soil of root derived organic C during a growing season can range between 0.1 and 2.8 t C ha(-1). Quantifying inputs from different processes has proved difficult and the relative importance of exudation and root death under field conditions remains uncertain. The chemical composition of substrates released by exudation and root death is known to be very different. Exudates contain high concentrations of soluble organic substrates and as a consequence are highly labile, whereas additions of C from root death have structural organic substrates with lower potential decomposition rates. Losses of C from soil occur as a consequence of plant and microbial respiration. However, identifying the source of evolved CO2, whether it be from root or microbial respiration, is much more difficult. Some new methods using isotopic labelling and pool dilution have been developed to separate plant and microbial respiration, and despite difficulties, these promise to provide valuable information on the processes of C input and loss from soils.At a field scale measurements and models would suggest that soil and crop management can play a significant role in determining the extent of C sequestration by soils and the proportion of labile C present. A comparison of 11 field studies showed that soil respiration varies between 4 and 26 t C ha(-1) year(-1), with management such as tillage, drainage, grazing and manure application exerting a strong influence on the magnitude of fluxes. Net ecosystem exchange of C has been shown to be at least an order of magnitude lower than respiratory losses in comparable studies, but land management is important in determining the direction and magnitude of the C flux. Recent studies have suggested that although the overall quantity of C stored in European soils is increasing, this increase is confined largely to forested areas and that many cropped soils are losing soil organic matter. It is has been suggested that that the biological potential for C storage in European cropland lies between 9 and 120 Mt C year(-1). In order to take advantage of this potential and to develop management systems that promote C storage we need to achieve a better understanding of the processes of C input and loss, and develop improved models using pools that coincide with measurable soil C fractions. (c) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:130 / 154
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Seasonal Variability of Soil Organic Carbon Fractions Under Arable Land
    Schiedung, Henning
    Bornemann, Ludger
    Welp, Gerhard
    PEDOSPHERE, 2017, 27 (02) : 380 - 386
  • [32] Change in soil organic carbon following afforestation of former arable land
    Vesterdal, L
    Ritter, E
    Gundersen, P
    FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2002, 169 (1-2) : 137 - 147
  • [33] Application of soil phytoliths to the quantitative characterization of temperate grassland ecosystems: a case study in Northeast China
    Gao, Guizai
    Li, Dehui
    Jie, Dongmei
    Li, Nannan
    Liu, Lidan
    Liu, Hongyan
    Wang, Jiangyong
    Niu, Honghao
    Meng, Meng
    Liu, Ying
    Zhang, Guihua
    PLANT AND SOIL, 2021, 459 (1-2) : 329 - 342
  • [34] Seasonal Variability of Soil Organic Carbon Fractions Under Arable Land
    Henning SCHIEDUNG
    Ludger BORNEMANN
    Gerhard WELP
    Pedosphere, 2017, (02) : 380 - 386
  • [35] Application of soil phytoliths to the quantitative characterization of temperate grassland ecosystems: a case study in Northeast China
    Guizai Gao
    Dehui Li
    Dongmei Jie
    Nannan Li
    Lidan Liu
    Hongyan Liu
    Jiangyong Wang
    Honghao Niu
    Meng Meng
    Ying Liu
    Guihua Zhang
    Plant and Soil, 2021, 459 : 329 - 342
  • [36] The contribution of deadwood to soil carbon dynamics in contrasting temperate forest ecosystems
    V. L. Shannon
    E. I. Vanguelova
    J. I. L. Morison
    L. J. Shaw
    J. M. Clark
    European Journal of Forest Research, 2022, 141 : 241 - 252
  • [37] The contribution of deadwood to soil carbon dynamics in contrasting temperate forest ecosystems
    Shannon, V. L.
    Vanguelova, E., I
    Morison, J. I. L.
    Shaw, L. J.
    Clark, J. M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH, 2022, 141 (02) : 241 - 252
  • [38] The carbon budget of newly established temperate grassland depends on management intensity
    Ammann, C.
    Flechard, C. R.
    Leifeld, J.
    Neftel, A.
    Fuhrer, J.
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2007, 121 (1-2) : 5 - 20
  • [39] Sustainable Management of Soils of Dryland Ecosystems of India for Enhancing Agronomic Productivity and Sequestering Carbon
    Srinivasarao, Ch
    Venkateswarlu, B.
    Lal, Rattan
    Singh, A. K.
    Kundu, Sumanta
    ADVANCES IN AGRONOMY, VOL 121, 2013, 121 : 253 - 329
  • [40] THE INFLUENCE OF LAND USE AND MANAGEMENT MEASURES ON THE QUALITY OF GRASSLAND SOIL
    Wang, K.
    Jiao, Z.
    Tian, X.
    Fan, H.
    Zhang, F.
    Li, Y.
    APPLIED ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2019, 17 (04): : 7511 - 7522