The role of plants and land management in sequestering soil carbon in temperate arable and grassland ecosystems

被引:162
|
作者
Rees, RM [1 ]
Bingham, IJ
Baddeley, JA
Watson, CA
机构
[1] SAC Edinburgh, Crop & Soil Res, Penicuik EH26 0PH, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] SAC, Aberdeen, Scotland
关键词
carbon sequestration; rhizodeposition; roots; soil respiration; land management; soil organic matter; CO2; rhizosphere; soil management;
D O I
10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.12.020
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
Global climate change and concerns about soil quality have led to a widespread interest in the opportunities that are available to sequester carbon in soils. To achieve a better understanding of the changes in C storage, we need to be able to accurately measure and model inputs and losses of C from soils. This in turn requires a thorough understanding of the biological processes involved and the way in which they are influenced by the soil's physical and chemical environment. The amount of C present in a soil is determined by the difference between C addition and C loss. Because these fluxes are large relative to changes in C storage, net storage can be very difficult to measure, particularly in the short term. Carbon is added to soil from plant and animal materials deposited on the soil surface. It is known that approximately 50% of C assimilated by young plants can be transferred below ground; some is used for root construction and maintenance as well as root respiration; some organic C is lost to the soil through exudation and root turnover. A comparison of eight studies has shown that the input to the soil of root derived organic C during a growing season can range between 0.1 and 2.8 t C ha(-1). Quantifying inputs from different processes has proved difficult and the relative importance of exudation and root death under field conditions remains uncertain. The chemical composition of substrates released by exudation and root death is known to be very different. Exudates contain high concentrations of soluble organic substrates and as a consequence are highly labile, whereas additions of C from root death have structural organic substrates with lower potential decomposition rates. Losses of C from soil occur as a consequence of plant and microbial respiration. However, identifying the source of evolved CO2, whether it be from root or microbial respiration, is much more difficult. Some new methods using isotopic labelling and pool dilution have been developed to separate plant and microbial respiration, and despite difficulties, these promise to provide valuable information on the processes of C input and loss from soils.At a field scale measurements and models would suggest that soil and crop management can play a significant role in determining the extent of C sequestration by soils and the proportion of labile C present. A comparison of 11 field studies showed that soil respiration varies between 4 and 26 t C ha(-1) year(-1), with management such as tillage, drainage, grazing and manure application exerting a strong influence on the magnitude of fluxes. Net ecosystem exchange of C has been shown to be at least an order of magnitude lower than respiratory losses in comparable studies, but land management is important in determining the direction and magnitude of the C flux. Recent studies have suggested that although the overall quantity of C stored in European soils is increasing, this increase is confined largely to forested areas and that many cropped soils are losing soil organic matter. It is has been suggested that that the biological potential for C storage in European cropland lies between 9 and 120 Mt C year(-1). In order to take advantage of this potential and to develop management systems that promote C storage we need to achieve a better understanding of the processes of C input and loss, and develop improved models using pools that coincide with measurable soil C fractions. (c) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:130 / 154
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Under temperate climate, the conversion of grassland to arable land affects soil nutrient stocks and bacteria in a short term
    Obermeier, Michael M.
    Gnaedinger, Friederike
    Raj, Abilash C. Durai
    Obermeier, Wolfgang A.
    Schmid, Christoph A. O.
    Balazs, Helga
    Schroeder, Peter
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 703 (703)
  • [2] A Review on Carbon Source and Sink in Arable Land Ecosystems
    Liu, Xiaochen
    Wang, Shuai
    Zhuang, Qianlai
    Jin, Xinxin
    Bian, Zhenxing
    Zhou, Mingyi
    Meng, Zhuo
    Han, Chunlan
    Guo, Xiaoyu
    Jin, Wenjuan
    Zhang, Yufei
    LAND, 2022, 11 (04)
  • [3] Carbon sequestration in temperate grassland ecosystems and the influence of management, climate and elevated CO2
    Jones, MB
    Donnelly, A
    NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 2004, 164 (03) : 423 - 439
  • [4] Accounting for variability in soil microbial communities of temperate upland grassland ecosystems
    Grayston, SJ
    Griffith, GS
    Mawdsley, JL
    Campbell, CD
    Bardgett, RD
    SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 2001, 33 (4-5): : 533 - 551
  • [5] Soil structure and soil hydraulic properties of Haplic Luvisol used as arable land and grassland
    Kodesova, Radka
    Jirku, Veronika
    Kodes, Vit
    Muehlhanselova, Marcela
    Nikodem, Antonin
    Zigova, Anna
    SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 2011, 111 (02): : 154 - 161
  • [6] Soil carbon dynamics in the temperate Himalayas: Impact of land use management
    Kumar, Shamal Shasang
    Wani, Owais Ali
    Mir, Shakeel Ahmad
    Babu, Subhash
    Sharma, Vikas
    Chesti, Majeed Ul Hassan
    Baba, Zahoor Ahmad
    Sofi, Parvaze Ahmad
    Wani, Fehim Jeelani
    Dar, Shahnawaz Rasool
    Singh, Raghavendra
    Yadav, Devideen
    FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2022, 10
  • [7] Soil organic matter storage in temperate lowland arable, grassland and woodland topsoil and subsoil
    Antony, Dedy
    Collins, Chris D.
    Clark, Joanna M.
    Sizmur, Tom
    SOIL USE AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 38 (04) : 1532 - 1546
  • [9] CONTROLS OF PLANT AND SOIL CARBON IN A SEMIHUMID TEMPERATE GRASSLAND
    SEASTEDT, TR
    COXWELL, CC
    OJIMA, DS
    PARTON, WJ
    ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 1994, 4 (02) : 344 - 353
  • [10] Quantitative soil quality indexing of temperate arable management systems
    Askari, Mohammad Sadegh
    Holden, Nicholas M.
    SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 2015, 150 : 57 - 67